Moral neutrality makes them get away with certain happenings or decisions in the organization.
I agree with the writer on his stand because certain scenarios in any organization can prove to be a threat to the integrity of the whole working department. The causes of moral muteness can be for their own power play such as exhibition of power and effectiveness and this is the main reason why many use the pattern of moral muteness to avoid any sort of dysfunctional activity that goes on in the organization. Since, managers are on a superior level than a normal worker, so it is true to a certain degree that they have the pressure of performing up to the mark and make transparency in their affairs so that the management keeps on working. The author does, however, exhibit presupposition in his article primarily that since, the manager is the authoritative figure he/she always knows the best decision for the organization.
The Sarbanes Oxley Act was passed in Congress on July 25, 2002 which was to deal with the accounting board and establishment of firms and registration of the firms within the board to set up new auditing boards and go through procedures of checking. It is taken in consideration that many parts of the Act relating to the accounting oversight are not effective and it appears that only some are functional. The act has rules and procedures for the issuer and redefines the accounting certification and certain penalties. The outline discussed, points out at the consequences for the issuer as well as defining the issuer. It also points out the audit committee requirements and corporate office requirements of the accounting firms not to mention that it also describes in detail the accounting firm requirements. It explains the need for corporate attorneys to prove at the time of violation the material of violation plus the security and law breaches of the firm.
It is necessary for the attorney