Focuses on the process, progress, and prediction of your legislation - Case Study Example

The bill was introduced into the House on November 10, 2015, getting twenty-five percent progressions. Subsequently the bill was referred to the higher education committee on January 26, 2015. On March, the bill was introduced to the floor of the house before going back to the Senate Higher Education Committee. By June, prior to the house going for recess, most of the pieces of the bill had successfully been voted through awaiting their implementation on September first, 2015. An example of the pieces of bills that passed includes the SB 453 concerning the minimum scores needed for public schools students to get credit through an evaluation set through university-level evaluation programs.

Others such as HB 1160 that relate to particular information reported to the Texas Higher Education Organizing Board by organizations of higher education for the objective of observance checking did get the majority vote (Texas Legislative Council). The supporter of education bills such as the influential k-12 advocacy group and the Texans for Education Reform were not delighted because of the delayed passage of the bill (Bilika 56). The supporter argument concerning the reforms in public schools was that accountability systems would make an institution performance simpler to comprehend and that it would aid more guardians to become involved in their childrens learning.

It would also permit the state to target failing schools efficiently. Critics of the bill on the mother hand claimed that offering an institution a low grade would unfairly stigmatize the school and its learners. They also argued that improved grades would not take into explanation issue such as funding difficulties. I am of the opinion that the education bill is significant to bring transformations to the education sector in Texas. Thus, I support the bill because it will enable all persons in the Texas state to get access to higher education due to the act of