According to the author of the film Arthur Miller, he lent credence to the accuracy of the historical and political context of the film by admitting that the characters were portrayed as accurately as possible as they were “drawn to the best of my ability in conformity with their known behavior”. Indeed the film accurately depicted the prevailing political and historical milieu of the time. During that time, Puritans from England settled in Massachusetts and their religious background was heavily reflected in the theme of the film. The character’s particular predisposition towards religion which became the catalyst for the prosecution and legal proceeding was also the highlighted. The subtleties of fear and anxiety during that time were also revealed. It has to be noted that during that time, Salem was in perpetual fear of Indian invasion which made the village susceptible to believe that they were being punished by God with their Puritan background. The detail of the trial, along with other circumstances in the film, was understandably altered to make the film more dramatic and be commercially attractive for public viewing. For example, the main protagonist, Abigail Williams, was actually 11 years old while John Proctor was actually 60 years old when the actual event happened. With regard to the proceeding of the trial, the film was able to portray how flawed the legal process of the time. The film was able to portray how frivolous evidence such as spectral evidence or evidence based on dreams and visions become admissible in court during that time. Testimonies based on hearsays were also considered. The sitting Chief Magistrate, William Stoughton was not even qualified as a Chief Justice because he was not even a lawyer but a theologian. As a result, the office which was supposed to dispense justice became an enforcer of religion. In 1692, witchcraft was considered a crime and anybody who is tried for the crime will be denied, legal counsel. This was adequately portrayed in the movie. The obstinacy of the magistrates in dealing with anything that has something to do with the “devil” was also dramatically highlighted.
Cite this document
(“A View of Ecclesiastical Beliefs on Early American Law as Seen in the Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/451949-law-and-religion-a-view-of-ecclesiastical-beliefs-on-early-american-law-as-seen-in-the-film-the-crucible
(A View of Ecclesiastical Beliefs on Early American Law As Seen in the Essay)
“A View of Ecclesiastical Beliefs on Early American Law As Seen in the Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/visual-arts-film-studies/451949-law-and-religion-a-view-of-ecclesiastical-beliefs-on-early-american-law-as-seen-in-the-film-the-crucible.
Cited: 0 times
This research is being carried out to reveal whether film presents a unique understanding of how the law actually works/worked versus what the law on the books as it is/was…
The Allan’s decision must satisfy the requirements of the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 and the treatments received by the shortlisted applicants must not have been subject to indirect discrimination on grounds of religion or belief within as defined by the Regulations.
The Jewish stringent observance of laws in order to dissuade sinful behaviour was contrasted by Paul’s novel ideas regarding sin. Paul cannot be seen as being anarchic in nature or by design in his refusal to submit to the dominance of laws. Instead, Paul can be seen as introducing a subtle compromise between abiding religious laws and defining sinful behaviour otherwise.
This will be achieved by analyzing some of the consumer items that were moved, as well as critiquing articles that illuminate early American culture. These consumer items will be obtained from the article by Catherine Cangany, titled “Fashioning Moccasins: Detroit, the Manufacturing Frontier, and The Empire of Consumption, 1701–1835.”1 The study’s analytical argument is that the movement of consumer items from the Northern America led to materials exchange of culture to other parts of the world.
In the early days, tribes were led by chiefs. These chiefs were not voted on like those in our nation and other democracies. They were merely selected through heredity. Not just anyone could be a chief. When one chief died, another was selected from either the sons, the sons in law, or nephews of the last chief.
The fictional perspective is introduced as 2 individuals, Jack Dawson (Leonardo DiCaprio, protagonist 1) and Rose Dewitt- Bukater (Kate Winslet, protagonist 1). These are the main characters which, although are from different classes, meet on the ship and fall in love.
One of the main problems within American society during the 1700s to early 1900s was the period in American history that many believe should not have even occurred. But, one cannot run away from the historical indignities suffered by those imprisoned in an pragmatically bound society.
The merchants and other financers were supportive and they were all over the country. There was vast development in agriculture too, the fertile land was brought to use especially in the vast western region. The population of
The article provides very crucial revelations about democracy that at the time was rare in many countries.
The American system of voting using the majority and the college was in existence at this time. These institutions, however, not so developed as in contrast to today,
They argued that as long as the church was in place, there was a Spanish order, which could ease the colonization process to prosperity. The church prospered through the Crown. Its missionaries facilitated the conversion of Indians through imposition
2 pages (500 words)Assignment
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic A View of Ecclesiastical Beliefs on Early American Law as Seen in the Film for FREE!