StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Microsoft Monopoly - Term Paper Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper 'Microsoft Monopoly' presents the name Microsoft which was probably coined from microcomputer software and refers to a worldwide corporation that primarily started as a personal computer (PC) software development corporation for IBM-and-compatible microcomputers…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.8% of users find it useful
Microsoft Monopoly
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Microsoft Monopoly"

Word Count excluding Bibliography: 2136 Topic: Does Microsoft have monopoly power in the market(s) for personal computer operating system? If yes, did Microsoft maintain this power by using anticompetitive practices? Introduction The name Microsoft was probably coined from microcomputer software and refers to a worldwide corporation that primarily started as a personal computer (PC) software development corporation for IBM-and-compatible microcomputers (Meese, 1999). Published information further indicates that the corporation was incepted sometime in 1975 before incorporation in 1981. It is at this time when the integrated company developed “a command user interface (CUI) operating system (OS) called Disk Operating System (DOS)” as observed by Reynolds (2005). From this time on, reports illustrate that Microsoft has grown in might and fame to rule the world of information technology in modern times. The corporation is currently boasting of a plethora of products and software useful in the world of informatics and computing as cited by Page and John (2009). In spite of this colourful and robust growth attributed to Microsoft, critics argue that the playing field has been lopsided in favour of Microsoft. It is from this argument that the author intends to establish whether Microsoft has monopoly power in the markets for personal computer operating system and whether this power has been maintained by using anticompetitive practices. The essay is divided into the sections discussed hereunder. Microsoft’s monopoly powers From the economics perspective, monopoly is taken to refer to “a market in which there are many buyers but only one seller” (Garry, 1990). In a monopolistic situation, the seller is usually at liberty to assign any price to the products on offer as propounded by Craig and Steven (1999). Elsewhere, Bill (2004) has defined monopoly as “the exclusive possession or control over something”. A number of arguments have stipulated that there is a lot of dominance when one organisation possesses monopoly of a certain commodity. Although this preposition has highly been contested, certain preconditions justify the situation. Consider the following situation for instance. When one company is the sole provider of a particular product or has a very large portion of it and therefore controls most of its usage, then that company is said to wield a lot of monopoly power. In line with this observation, it can be concluded that “monopoly is the dominant ownership of a thing in which one has a severe influence over its usage including even the portion owned by others” (Garry, 1990). Economists across the globe have concurred that a big characteristic of monopoly is the scarcity of the item in question. In view of the foregoing definition, the current author takes on the real Microsoft monopoly. There is no doubt that Microsoft has monopoly in Intel PC Operating Systems and other micro-computing applications. Available data has shown that other players in the industry have been aware for quite sometime about Microsoft’s bundling tactics where one must office productivity applications that are tied to MS Office for compatibility. This idea brings more profitability to the company as illustrated by the following model. Windows sold at £4, profit is £8; WMP sold at £5, profit is £10. When both items are sold as a bundle, profit is £24 (Leslie, 2004), hence the consumer suffers. Similarly, web-surfing users are reported to be using Internet Explorer produced by Microsoft in disproportionate ratio of about 8:1 over other available browsers (William and John, 1999). Proponents have come out in defence of Microsoft’s monopoly by arguing that it fundamentally supersedes any other company that has ever found its way to the market. This has been attributed to the simple reasons resident in Microsoft’s heavy “investment in skill, experience, training, and tools of Windows software developers themselves”. In principle, I tend to agree with this argument for the fact that research has unearthed a wealth haven of Microsoft assets and a window of opportunity to specialised developers. In contrast, Microsoft distracters have been busy wasting precious moments coding for the Windows environments instead of initiating efforts that can offer fair competition. Further reports by Page and John (2009) have continued to demonstrate Microsoft’s might in industry dominance by submitting that the best of seasoned professional developers have been unable to choose an environment other than Windows. In their views, the scale of market set by Windows has dwarfed its competitors leaving market developers no other option. Additionally, the sheer size of the Windows’ installed base is seen as a hedge against market change (Meese, 1999). Windows is thus perceived as a platform that has come to stay. This claim clearly demonstrates how enormously Microsoft has invested in human capital to improve on its Windows platform and continue dominating Windows applications, thereby making its monopoly self-perpetuating (Scherer, 1993). Unfortunately, many companies have refused to acknowledge Microsoft’s evident monopoly and its sheer resolve to maintain it. Instead, these companies are reported to be engaged in useless and endless struggles of looking for possible opportunities to penetrate Microsoft’s well established markets (Leslie, 2004). These efforts have been dismal because Microsoft operates in a seemingly “locked market”. This cushioning has not been without challenges. It is reported that in recent times, Windows dominance in operating systems is no longer assured. Scherer (1993) observes that perfect monopolistic situations remain safe only when competitors have a penchant for making money. That’s why Microsoft was once capable of fending off the mighty IBM which had insatiable desire to make money as reported by Bill (2004). The entry of Linux in the computing setup is feared to work against the interests of Microsoft. It is rumoured that Linux has no interests in economic gains, thus upsetting the arrangements for a perfect monopolistic cushion. In the observations made by Bill (2004), Linux “needs no profits, corporate partnerships, or investors in order to succeed. Additionally, it depends only on their campaigners’ infatuation with programming and their self-imposed standards of quality in their own work”. Moreover, supporters of Linux are motivated by their zeal to level the otherwise lopsided computing landscape created by Microsoft (Reynolds, 2005). It is therefore speculated that the expected robust growth of Linux will come from the other broad market targets left open by Microsoft busy defending its monopoly status. Microsoft’s anti-competitive practices In an effort to defend its position in the market, Microsoft is blamed for engaging in anti-competitive practices in order to maintain the hard earned monopoly powers. Friend and foe alike have accused Microsoft of using exclusionary policies in dealing business according to views proffered by Michael (2001). In marketing sense, exclusionary practices are considered in relation to the practice of monopolisation which, as indicated in the foregoing paragraphs exists between existing firms and new entrants in most cases but at times between existing firms (William and John, 1999). Further reports clarify that exclusionary practices compose predatory pricing, strategic investment, bundling and tying, incompatibility and networking. Reviewed literature has indicated that Microsoft has used a number of these practices discoursed in coming paragraphs to put their competitors out of business. In my informed view, use of exclusionary practices is permitted by law considering the business nature in contention. Nevertheless, numerous claims show that Microsoft used some of these practices in its exclusive favour. Observations pointed out by Meese (1999) illustrate that Microsoft has been intentionally bundling its operating system with its applications software, giving it indisputable lead in most microcomputers. In the views of Leslie (2004); Meese (1999) and Michael (2001), bundling and tying comprise an example of non- pricing exclusionary behaviour in which case a product is offered under the condition that another product is purchased. These are alternatively referred to as ‘tie-in sales’ and may include the selling jointly of Internet Explorer with Windows operating system or shoes with laces just to mention a few examples (Leslie, 2004). Market experts have argued that bundling and tying have noticeable positive and negative effects to the company. Positively, the company increases efficiency by assembling for the consumer since it enjoys division of labour and scale economies (Page and John, 2009). Similarly, the consumer is bound to benefit from a multiplicity of information emanating from the manufacturer who has a rich knowledge base for the various products on offer. The negative effects on the other hand are particularly to the consumer as illustrated by the model mentioned above. Another situation may occur where the manufacturer may sell for instance, a photocopying machine at low price but sell the cartridge at high price (Page and John, 2009). This will be very costly to the consumer in the end because the photocopying machine is once for all purchase while the cartridge is purchased continuously as need may arise. In addition to bundling and tying, Microsoft is also accused of exercising predatory pricing which is considered as a price exclusionary behaviour. In the views of Reynolds (2005), predatory pricing occurs when a firm wielding monopoly power charge a low price to a similar product to force aspiring competitors as well as existing ones out of the market. The immediate impact of this behaviour is higher benefits for consumers due to low prices in the short run with the firm counting losses. The practice of predation is best explained by the reputation model where the incumbent will not fight new entrants due to the presumption that fighting will be useless especially in the presence of perfect information (Bill, 2004). Microsoft has thus been enjoying the benefits of its reputation. Alternatively, Microsoft has similarly been signalling false idea of price or demand to deter entrant who lack knowledge of cost or demand of the market (Page and John, 2009). Low prices are also set to show low profitability as demonstrated by the signalling model. The ‘deep-pocket’ model clearly illustrates the status enjoyed by Microsoft where the company has fully established itself in the OS market. Microsoft has always emerged the winner in a price war involving ‘shallow-pocketed’ new entrants (Page and John, 2009). The overall effect of predatory pricing is delayed benefits to the consumer. Available study findings indicate that Microsoft is revered for its propensity to acquire competitor’s firms in most competitive buyouts, including those in markets other than computer software (Leslie, 2004). As noted by Bill (2004), Microsoft did its first buyout in 1987 by acquiring Forethought’s presentation program that became the modern day Microsoft PowerPoint presentation program. Ever since this first successful acquisition, Microsoft has repeatedly done numerous purchases of competitor companies that total to approximately 200 different firms. This unobstructed acquisition of competitor companies within a very short period of time is reportedly said to have send shock waves down the spines of industry players. This is attested by the recent denial of Microsoft to purchase a software company Intuit, specialised in selling a leading personal finance program according to claims by Page and John (2009). The argument behind this denial is to avoid concentrating too much market power into one firm according to market experts. Finally, further reports allude that Microsoft has resorted to colluding with firms in other markets in cases where it has failed to purchase a firm it has been eyeing. In market terms, Scherer (1993) argues that collusion is equitable to networking which simply involves cooperation with other companies that effectively blocks entry of new players. In the view of certain government authorities, collusion is blacklisted to control the amount of market power wielded by one firm or group of firms (Garry, 1990). But reports are widespread showing that Microsoft in one way or the other has been able to circumvent these anti-trust laws and managed to collude with other firms (Bill, 2004). A case in point is presented by the current arrangement Microsoft has established with the existing notebook manufacturers in Poland to have Windows OS pre-installed on the notebooks as cited by Reynolds (2005). This arrangement has put the consumer wishing to buy the notebook in a very awkward position because, once hooked on to Windows OS remains so until an extra fee is paid change to another operating system (Page and John, 2009). However, a number of manufactures are reported to have confessed that they were offered irresistible benefits to cooperate with Microsoft. Conclusion From the foregoing discussion, it has been categorically illustrated that governments the world over have taken a more strict stance against Microsoft since 2002. A number of these harsh resolutions have started influencing the way Microsoft is making business decisions as noted by Reynolds (2005). Consumers’ enlightenment about their rights to innovation and choice has effectively led to Microsoft’s diminishing market share to other upcoming firms. In this regard, continued enforcement of strict regulations and rampart consumer sensitisation will see Microsoft streamlining its business ideals to remain relevant. But one very clear issue in this discourse is that Microsoft has enjoyed enormous monopoly power in the markets for personal computer operating system since inception. Secondly, there is no doubt that what Microsoft did to maintain this power was not different from what any other company would have done in the same position. Bibliography Bill, L. (2004) Monopoly Capitalism in Crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Craig, R and Steven, S. (1999) Preserving Monopoly: Economic Analysis, Legal Standards, and the Microsoft Case, 7 Geo. Mas. L. Rev. 617 Garry, O. K. (1990) Monopoly Power: How It Is Measured and How It Has Changed. Salt Lake City, Utah: Crossroads Research Institute. Leslie, Christopher. (2004) Cutting through Tying Theory with Occam’s Razor: a Simple Explanation of Tying Arrangements, 78 Tul. L. Rev. 727. Meese, A. (1999) Monopoly Bundling In Cyberspace: How Many Products Does Microsoft Sell? 44 Antitrust Bulletin 65. Michael, D. W. (2001) Exclusivity and Tying in U.S. v. Microsoft: What We Know, and Don’t Know, 15 Journal of Economic Perspectives, 63-80. Page, W. H. and John, E. L. (2009) The Microsoft Case: Antitrust, High Technology, and Consumer Welfare. University of Chicago Press. Reynolds, A. (2005) The Microsoft Antitrust Appeal, Hudson Institute: 40 Wake Forest Law Review 1. Scherer, F. M. (1993) Monopoly and Competition Policy. Brook-field, Vt.: Edward Elgar. William, Page and John, L. (1999) Antitrust on Internet Time: Microsoft and the Law and Economics of Exclusion, 7 Supreme Court Economic Review 157-231. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Microsoft Monopoly Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words, n.d.)
Microsoft Monopoly Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/business/1745946-does-microsoft-has-monopoly-power-in-the-markets-for-personal-computer-operating-system-if-yes-did-microsoft-maintain-this-power-by-using-anticompetitive-practices
(Microsoft Monopoly Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
Microsoft Monopoly Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words. https://studentshare.org/business/1745946-does-microsoft-has-monopoly-power-in-the-markets-for-personal-computer-operating-system-if-yes-did-microsoft-maintain-this-power-by-using-anticompetitive-practices.
“Microsoft Monopoly Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”. https://studentshare.org/business/1745946-does-microsoft-has-monopoly-power-in-the-markets-for-personal-computer-operating-system-if-yes-did-microsoft-maintain-this-power-by-using-anticompetitive-practices.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Microsoft Monopoly

Market Power and the Economy

This may be as a result of monopoly in the supply of such commodity by a business, which offers less or no alternatives for customers who depend on the product.... For example, the majority of computer users rely on microsoft products due to the fact that the firm has managed to capture the goodwill of most computer manufacturers.... nbsp;In addition, the company supplies other computer accessories such as hardware for example mouse and keyboard as well as software such as the microsoft Office suite, which operates in all desktop and laptop computer models....
1 Pages (250 words) Case Study

Market Power (Business Enviroment Module)

Under market power, the firm can act in many ways such as forming cartels, monopolies and so on.... If this does occur, abuse of market power occurs when firms set high… According to Vickers (2005) competition is the key in market economy.... But this competition can also increase the use and abuse of power by many organizations....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Anti-trust behavior of Microsoft

hellip; The author argues that Microsoft is not a monopoly in its complete sense.... In economics, a monopoly is a special type of market structure where there is only one seller and many buyers with products which have not close substitutes.... There are however, certain other conditions to be met if one can completely characterize a firm as a pure monopoly.... One of the key characteristics of monopoly market structure is the high barriers to entry either through technological sophistication or through other legal barriers....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Microsoft Corporation as an Example of a Monopoly

The focus in this paper is on monopoly, a market structure characterized by a unique product, single seller, and the impossible entry into the market by other companies.... Companies that enjoy monopoly power over the market become the sole suppliers of the products.... hellip; With a lot of controversies surrounding the companies, two groups of people arose based on their views of monopoly significance to the society.... On one side are the protagonists who believe that monopoly companies are beneficial as they benefit the society greatly....
5 Pages (1250 words) Assignment

Monopoly Market Structure - Microsoft Corporation

The plaintiffs alleged that Microsoft abused monopoly power on Intel-based personal computers in its handling of operating… The main issue in the case was whether Microsoft was allowed to bundle Internet Explorer web browser software with its Microsoft Windows operating system.... The plaintiffs alleged that Microsoft abused monopoly power on Intel-based personal computers in its handling of operating system sales and web browser sales.... Boyes & Melvin further pointed out that” a firm that has monopoly power is a price maker rather than a price taker” (p....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

The Microsoft Case

According to the Kiang (2010), the company was illegally leveraging its monopoly power in the operating systems market by giving its applications programmers with unfair lead time.... However, the merger would take the market structure from being duopoly to a monopoly, but Microsoft Company abandoned plans from the merger several weeks after the suit was brought that led to investigation of antitrust behavior of the company in the market.... o you agree or disagree that Microsoft was trying to gain monopoly power in the computer software industryBy tying to purchase the Intuit Company that had largest shares in the market, I agree the company was trying to adopt the monopoly power in the computer software industry....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Monopoly Market Structure and Behaviour of Firms

Microsoft is one of the leading companies in the high technology… The paper discusses the negative and positive aspects of Microsoft's monopoly. There are strong barriers to entry to the market.... In a monopoly market, the seller sets enjoys maximum market share.... Since new firms cannot enter the firm profitably, the monopoly power of the incumbent firms is protected and they are facilitated to enjoy supernormal profits in the short run as well as in the long run (Abramson, 2005)....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Keeping a Competitive Edge on the Marketplace

Competition, innovation, and the Microsoft Monopoly: Antitrust in the digital marketplace : proceedings of a conference held by the Progress & Freedom Foundation in Washington, DC, February 5, 1998.... For instance, microsoft uses brand loyalty to maintain the competitive edge where they provide to the customers the windows OS on purchase of their products....
1 Pages (250 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us