Language: Phrase Styles - Essay Example

? Language The earliest as well as the most well known application of phrase style is, in connection with the unique traits of a number of single writer’s utilization of language, for instance, Wordsworth’s style, or a mature Shakespeare’s style. There are lots of distinctive parts of relevance for this understanding: such as one might want to shed light on a few relative issues, or one may be apprehensive with the study of a few sole author like an end within itself, or again one might be connected with stylistic recognition effort - “linguistics forensics” (Leech & Short, p. 38, 2007), as it is at times informally known - as with the studies into the “style of the Pauline epistles” (Leech & Short, p. 40, 2007), to observe whether single individual inscribed them all. However, within all of these functions, the main mission is alike: to identify from the “totality of the language that an author has used those features which would be generally agreed as belonging to him” (Leech & Short, p. 64, 2007), recognizing him as a person in opposition of the background of the remaining language utilizing people. Moreover, within these distinctive linguistic creators that is known by this initial application of word style. Second, and directly connected utilization, is to consider style in a “collective sense” (SAS Publishing & Kohl, p. 88, 2008), indicating factions of literary people, like while mentioning the “style of Augustan poetry” (SAS Publishing & Kohl, p. 89, 2008), or taking a broad view of the style linked with single particular type of performance in place of some other. This is a further common aspect, apparently, although it is to be take into consideration that the method for coming to any results within this area is exactly similar to the study of single authors: distinguishing linguistic characteristics have still to be recognized as well as explained - just this time the utilization of these characteristics is collective by a lot of individuals, and are not distinctive “in the narrow sense” (SAS Publishing & Kohl, p. 128, 2008). “These two senses are the most common in any discussion about English language” (Weiss, p. 102, 2005), taking into consideration the stress on literary analysis on explaining the uniqueness of authors as well as finding out the progress of types; although with respect to the study of the overall English language, it should be highlighted that these senses are very narrow. They are limited to literary English, as well as to the written type of the language. Although one can - and do - relate the word style to verbal English, “whether literary or not, and to written English which has nothing to do with literature at all” (Weiss, p. 158, 2005); and it is this further common use which offers a third sense. For instance, as one refers to the style of Civil Service writing style, or to the official style in which discourses or public statements are provided - “or even to the style of newspaper and television advertisements” (Carter & Nash, p. 99, 1991) - one is referring to a responsiveness of some particular aspects of English dialects and spellings, sentence structure and terminology, which describe in a unique way these particular uses. What should be highlighted is the significance of outing the evaluative assessments within a systematically expressive framework: value results with no “objective correlative” (Carter & Nash, p. 108, 1991) to sustain them may offer an immense deal of individual contentment, although they do not offer something of eternal significant value. One can simply resolves an argument as to the good points or negative points of a person's style if the “parties in the debate are first and foremost objectively” (Carter & Nash, p. 134, 1991) know the pertinent features of the language they are talking about. The explanatory, classifying job is somewhat most important, because it offers the reason for the answer, which any two reviewers might be discussing. The English language is not a distinct, uniform, constant thing: it is an intricate blend of contrasting formations. The adverse thing is that a large number of individuals view this as a substandard situation, and make effort to rectify it. The English speaking world is packed with those who would like to make everybody else speak the same as they do, or the same what Shakespeare did (Strunk et al, p. 201, 1999). It is a misfortune that the reality and basic function of diversity within the English language cannot be acknowledged for what it is - an unavoidable invention of language growth. Many of the alleged revolts in the utilization of rhythmical language in the history of English literature can eventually be abridged to efforts to change the modes of expression linked with one type of the language by those linked with some other: such as the application of technical words by the Metaphysical writers, or by a number of 20th century novelists, into a lyrical perspective where technical language had been more or less absent for a while. “Whether the language of the age is or is not the language of poetry is not a matter for discussion here” (Lynch, p. 184, 2008); although it must be taken into consideration that this discussion will never come to an end until an effort is made to shed light on the idea of ‘language of the age’ for itself - and with the intention of doing this, a little reference to a premise of language diversity will be essential. The requirement of these applications is with respect to the aspects of deviation. It is during such efforts to offer a comparatively practical method of shedding light on as well as studying language deviation methodically, accurately, and in detail, that linguistics anticipates being capable of making a stable input to the study of different styles of English language (Willaims, p. 105, 2005). Of significance for ‘stylistic study’ is the method in which the general connotation of a utilization of language is classified, and it is this study of connotation that takes place at the point of discussion. Works Cited Carter, R., Nash, Walter. Seeing Through Language: A Guide to Styles of English Writing. Wiley-Blackwell, 1991. Leech, Geoffrey, Short, Mick. Style in Fiction: A Linguistic Introduction to English Fictional Prose. Pearson ESL, 2007. Lynch, Jack. The English Language: A User's Guide. Focus Publishing, 2008. SAS Publishing and Kohl, John. The Global English Style Guide. SAS Press, 2008. Strunk, William, White, E. B. and Angell, Roger. The Elements of Style. Longman, 1999. Weiss, Edmond H. The Elements of International English Style. M.E. Sharpe, 2005. Williams, Joseph M. Style: The Basics of Clarity and Grace. Longman, 2005. Read More