The announcement of the proposed merger of Boots Group PLC with Alliance Unichem on 3rd October 2005, will result in the creation of UK's largest pharmaceutical company. When completed, the combined companies will own a 40 percent market share of the wholesale and a 17 percent share of the pharmacy market (BBC, 2005)…
The product and market differences currently enjoyed by Boots and Alliance, will merge together in the hopes of stimulating greater growth than could be expected as separate entities. Their confidence in growth in shown by the fact that they will be paying 2.5 times of dividend despite the two companies having different dividend policies. It is aimed that the merger will be finalised in April 2006. Most companies, if not all, do mergers because they expect to perform better and be worth more together than as being apart. There are numerous benefits that companies gain from mergers and the Boots-Alliance deal is no different.
Alliance had long ago announced that its plans for growth included acquisitions and mergers. With a history of acquiring patents and new pharmaceuticals to add to their product line, the addition of the Boots health and beauty line will be an appropriate addition to spur revenue growth. Alliance's drug pipeline, though not dry, has few new pharmaceuticals on the horizon. Isprelor, a new delivery method for the existing drug Misoprosol, is set for release sometime in 2006. Posidorm, a synthetic Melatonin, has entered late stage trials and hopes are for a 2007 release date (Alliance-Unichem). Posidorm, if approved, is expected to increase the Boots-Alliance revenue stream by as much as 20 percent in 2008. ...
Cite this document
(“Merger motives Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/business/272798-merger-motives
(Merger Motives Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Merger Motives Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/business/272798-merger-motives.
The two terms have a slight difference, on one hand, acquisition may refer to a company taking over another and establishing itself as a new owner. On the other hand, merger occurs when two companies agree to operate as one new company.
"Usually mergers occur in a consensual setting where executives from the target Company help those from the purchaser in a due diligence process to ensure that the deal is beneficial to both parties." (Wikipedia)
Economies of scale: "This refers to the fact that the combined company can often reduce duplicate departments or operations, lowering the costs of the company relative to theoretically the same revenue stream, thus increasing profit." (Wikipedia, 2006) Through the merger the companies will consolidate under price and margin pressure.
This paper is aimed at reviewing mergers and acquisitions, the distinction between these two, the reasons or motives behind their pursuance and the post merger integration issues that firms may face. It starts by reviewing mergers and an acquisition and then proceeds to drawing a line between them.
Many of the activities involve implementation and sponsorship by government alone while others are the results of the joint efforts of government and business (Hart, Prakash, 2000). Company grouping programs have evolved in a number of countries, often under the label of network schemes.
o statistics from the web resource Mergerstat.com, the amount of mergers only until 2002 has reached 4,363 worth over $291,7 billions1 and the majority of the deals was done within Internet, Healthcare, Telecommunications, Banking and Semiconductors industries.
This type of
“Usually mergers occur in a consensual setting where executives from the target Company help those from the purchaser in a due diligence process to ensure that the deal is beneficial to both parties.” (Wikipedia)
Economies of scale: “This refers to the fact
Mergers and alliances are some of the common approaches, which organizations use to enter new markets. Companies can attain competitive advantage, which is impossible if each company operates individually, through mergers.
There are many benefits of merging or acquiring other companies depending on the motive of the company. An analysis of different cases of UK firms that went through acquisitions and mergers show that their success or failure mainly depended on the approach and strategy they
The result of the tussle was the intervention of renowned philosophers who used philosophical theories to establish what is right or develop a model that people can follow. Philosophers and other scholars
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Merger motives for FREE!