As such students dont necessarily take critical thinking. Based on this reasoning I believe the argument is invalid
This is an example of a deductive argument because it products a “right or wrong answer. The logic is sound in this example insofar as all the premises seem to be true (Or at least seem to be true). Although I would make the argument that there is a degree of a non sequitur. The reasoning behind this is that although supposedly “All college students study” one could argue that this is not true and it is for this reason that many college students are expelled. So based on this premise and information provided in chapter ten of our book the argument is invalid.
This again is an example of deductive reasoning because it does not pull on some degree of probability. However there is a problem with all of the assumptions in that one could argue that all college students do not necessarily attend class (For example distance education students). In the second premise, although it is the case that John attends class he does not necessarily attend college class. Based on these premises being weak I believe that the conclusion is weak and as such the argument is valid but very weak.
Chaffee, J. (2009) Thinking Critically, 9th Edition. City University of New York. Chapter 10 & 11 online reading resources available at http://college.cengage.com/english/chaffee/thinking_critically/9e/chapters/chapter10.htm and http://college.cengage.com/english/chaffee/thinking_critically/9e/chapters/chapter11.html Accessed on August 13th ...Show more