Whichever of these philosophies on education are adopted, depends on the value system and belief of the the individual and institution.
In the test, I am more inclined to the social reconstrutionism model of philosophy in education with a score of 18. My other scores were not that far behind which is 15 on both perrenialism and progressivism. I scored a near 14 on essentialism. In general, I agree on the hierarchial order of my belief system in the test. That I am more generally inclined to be a reconstructionist in view towards education while not discounting the two other essentials of perennialism and progressivism. I also agree to score lowest on essentialism
Social Reconstructionism is my highest score among the more because I believe that education should be a tool for society to improve itself. It is an empowering tool that would enable us as a race and as a people to learn and improve our lot. Education and learning after all is geared towards the betterment of our condition and could be a liberating tool in minimizing injustices in this world (Cohen, 1999).
Progressivism and perennialism were a near second because I am also a beliver that a person should develop himself or herself to the fullest by discovering the greatest achievement of humankind and make it as a benchmark as one pursues his or her ideals. There are truths, beauties and values that endures time that could serve as a solid foundation for a student to build his or her intellectual capacity and moral stature (Dewey, 1938). I am also a believer of progressivism because education should be focused on the student and not on stringent curriculum. I believe that the best teacher is experience and this is inherent in the progressivist construct which emphasizes experiment for the student to discover the universe around him or her.
Esssentialism was the last ...Show more