I failed to decipher any weakness in the abstract.
The author failed to stipulate where the introduction begins. The transition from abstract to the introduction part does not have a clear flow of information. However, the author tries to bring out the real scope of the problem in the introduction. The main aim of positive thinking is to catalyze a transformation in the apprehensions of psychology from obsession with mending the worst aspects in life to a fresh prominence on optimal working of people, collections, and organizations. Thus far, the author has provided little investigation on assimilating the affirmative psychology methodology into schools.
The author chose to use Constructivist grounded model case analysis as the in methodology of the research. The author provided a theoretical framework, research background and contributors, course content as well as delivery medium. These factors are usually instrumental in any methodology part of a project. Approaches of data collection, participant observations, field notes, artifacts were also outlined in the research. The data analysis procedure of this research centered on the qualitative records and utilized grounded model data analytic approaches to respond to the research problem. Since the course of classroom teaching was ﬁlled with fragmentary dynamic singularities, data was scrutinized and amassed with initial coding all through this study.
The determination of this research was to delve totally into the mechanisms of affective edification implementation, and numerous components arose from the data exploration. However, this research provides an in depth exploration as stated above. The author goes ahead to give the reader all the findings that they seek to find. The author finds that, to break the innate social typecasts is expected to be the long-standing undertaking of affective education. This information is probably the best finding that the author has unearthed. This statement is ...Show more