What Does the Success of the Huntsville Project Depend on - Case Study Example

HUNTSVILLE PROJECT Organizational structure The Huntsville project is developed based on objectives that are to be achieved through the developed schedule. The structure of the project is based on the project manager, teams, and sponsor among other professionals. The organization that is asserted in the project is based on the matrix approach. This approach is based on functionality, which in the Huntsville project, represents the objectives that are to be met in building the opportunity. Furthermore, it is hinged on objectivity; hence, the project needs and goals are identified. Once they are identified, they are allocated to different teams in different periods through the project development stages. A perfect exemplar of this is the architects that will be chosen to engage in development of plans of the structures that will be put up to contain the products associated with the project. Such a team has the function of coming up with strategic, comprehensive, and legally acceptable blueprints (Morris, Pinto & Leach, 2004). According to Morris et al. (2004) the matrix structure is helpful to the project through a number of ways. Firstly, the structure provides the management team with a checklist by which the progress and development of the project can be traced. Each of the teams is provided with the responsibility of handling a certain task associated with the project such as the contractors having to meet their responsibilities in erecting structures. The management team has the authority of subjecting the teams in the project to checkups leading to the completion of the project. Due to the need of including external resources in the project, the Huntsville project has planning and preparation phases. This nature of the project is helpful in the structure, organization, and management. This is because it provides a means by which the needs of the project are identified and determined. In this capacity, the matrix organizational structure allows the project management team to identify the needs and choose the best individuals or teams to handle the objectives and goals of the project. In the planning and preparation stages, the project demands that architects, a site and contractors among others identified and selected for the sole purpose of completing the project. The chosen teams that execute different tasks geared towards completion of the project provide an opportunity in which challenges, difficulties, and problems are identified and solved. The structure, based on different teams of experts covering different needs of the project, provides a mechanism by which project deliverables can be achieved in the course of the project. The structure allows the creation of a dynamic team in the Huntsville environment. This is instrumental in the execution of different tasks based on the allocated resources and the provision of complete objectives. The management is shielded from the problems that are easily covered by teams associated with certain goals and resources. However, it is pertinent to note that they are required to provide a report on the action taken. The matrix structure also provides the project with an efficient and effective communication channel between different teams and individuals in the structure. Management requires that information be passed down easily through the teams and channels. Different teams in the phases of the project require the passing of information from one terminal to another. In the case of the Huntsville project, it aids in augmenting the efficiency by which data regarding resource and schedule are presented to the team managers through to the project manager. In this concept, there is provision for the development of the project under watchful and informative leaders (Morris et al., 2004) Project Self Reflection A project can be represented as a system by which different parameters are required for successful completion. The Huntsville project reveals that project development is a dynamic process by which a minor change may have rippling effects in the completion of the preset goals and objectives. A number of parameters affecting the completion of projects may easily be covered under the topic of concepts of a project namely: quality, time, and budget. Under parameters of project management, the quality, costs, and schedule by which a project is to be completed provide a stringent measure by which accountability is to be executed. Each of these measures provides a means by which a project is to be successfully carried out. Through these parameters, each resource that is to be put in to the development of the Huntsville project shall be scrutinized and evaluated in the same concepts. Costs of the project are one of the parameters that determine the nature of the project when completed. In most cases, costs determine the project development choices made. However, costs are determined by a number of factors such as resources, which may be in the nature of raw material, human, skill resources, as well as time. Cost is an element that is affected by economic forces with time as a variant quality. Costs, in the Huntsville project, are determined by the resources acquired in the measures of skill, raw material, and quality. In costs, human resource is one of the parameters that must encompass quality, as well as schedule. Different contractors, architects, and other partakers towards achieving the end goals of project Huntsville contribute to the costs that are incurred through the project’s life cycle. In most cases, the quality of the project, based on the resource put into the development is determined by the skill, experience, and suitability that is associated with the completion of the project. There are measures that are associated with project management that associate cost to the nature of the project achieved in the development process. The schedule of a project is another parameter that determines the result of the project. The time that a project takes to completion affects quality, as well as costs of a project. A project’s demands based on time could mean a high budget, or a low budget based on the nature of the project. With different external factors affecting the nature of project, the cost of a project is determined by elements such as inflation and taxes that may be associated with resources necessary for project completion. With such variables, the nature of a project in terms of schedule affects quality as well as costs incurred through development of the Huntsville project. Quality, in the same respect of the Huntsville project, is determined by a number of elements such as the cost and budget. The success of a project requires that a set quality standard is set. Quality is a measure that is necessitated by the lifecycle costs. Costs, through the life of a project, are affected by quality of the input into the development process. Quality is obtained through the resource in material and skill placed in as the parameters of the project necessities. A combination of the three elements of project development as a function towards the development of the Huntsville project is the means by which the results of evaluation and assessment are to be encompassed in every project development stage. References Morris, W.G. Peter., Pinto, K. Jeffrey & Leach, P. Lawrence. (2004). The Wiley Guide to Managing Project s (2nd ed). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Read More