Ethnic and Morality There is a close relationship between morality and ethics but they do not mean the same thing. Ideally, vital instincts govern a healthy morality. On the other hand, anti-morality and ant-nature are aspects, which negate vital instincts…
Friedrich Nietzsche had a personal belief that morality is anti-nature. In fact, Nietzsche states that, “Every naturalism in morality-that is every health morality-is dominated by an instinct of life” (349). Indeed, Nietzsche helps us to define the idea of anti-nature by asserting that a human being is seemingly refuting the reality by denying their personal passion. In fact, according to Nietzsche and his moral philosophy, the healthiest moralities accommodate natural aspects while the unhealthy moralities negate nature. Nature derives human desires, which consequently define individual personality and how human beings behave. As such, I hold this fact and strongly oppose Nietzsche’s notion that morality is anti-nature. Friedrich Nietzsche observes that human beings should have the free will to choose what they want without coercion from any external forces. He further quotes that, “Anti-natural molarity-that is almost every morality which has so far been taught, revered, and preached-turns conversely against the instincts of life: it is condemnation of these instincts” (349). He also disputed the common notion that religions like Christianity drive human life and consequently asserted that religion and dominance of morality inhibits human nature. In this context, Nietzsche argued that ardent followers of a certain religion ignore the nature of humanity since religion forces individuals to behave in a manner that will please the supreme ruler of the reference religion. Friedrich Nietzsche holds that religion especially Christianity opposes human nature because it gives a leeway to individuals to adopt religious doctrines about human life hence limiting individuals from celebrating nature. Indeed, Nietzsche states that the most general foundation of every religion and morality is, “Do this and that, refrain from this and that,-then you will be happy” (352)! He uses this explanation to support the concept of anti-nature in morality. Notably, Nietzsche refers to morality as anti-nature by asserting that human desires control what individuals do, do not do, and confirms that morality distracts the course of nature. Nevertheless, various philosophers identify with the fact that nature generates human desires that consequently define human personality and morality. For instance, Immanuel Kant’s moral philosophy and other philosophers like Locke and Hobbes argues that moral requirements rely on a standard of rationality which is either based on desire instrumental principles of rationality or on rational intuition. This contradicts with Nietzsche’s assumption that human nature is prone to alteration by both morality and religion. Most specifically, I note that Nietzsche depicts religious people like Christians as hypocrites who can do anything to please God at the expense of altering their human nature. Ideally, Christians are rational beings who do not have such morality. Indeed, very few Christians would identify with Nietzsche’s argument since his ideas discourage Christians from following their religion. Notably, Nietzsche’s argument that religion alters human nature by allowing Christians to adopt variant aspects of life that prevent them from celebrating life is misguided. This is because Christians have morals that allow then to enjoy their lives just like any other person. In fact, his argument is not universal since it only addresses Christians thus leaving a significant would population. Assuredly, Nietzsche discourages people from ...
Cite this document
(“Ethnic and morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/104410-ethnic-and-morality
(Ethnic and Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“Ethnic and Morality Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/104410-ethnic-and-morality.
Goodman strongly argues that certain things are simply wrong and therefore, morality cannot be wholly relativistic. There appears to be a convergence at some point when some pertinent issues are considered. In this paper, I agree with Goodman that certain things are simply wrong irrespective of relativistic nature of morality.
In today’s world a Moral code is a unique and well-known system of Morality defined by its own specific religion, culture or philosophical background. A moral is any individual practice, action or teaching that is carried out within the individual’s defined Moral code.
Moreover, are we also to say that transparency, honesty, and sincerity are always good virtues and would always produce good effects? Contrary to popular opinion, politicians’ and lawyers’ have a role to fulfill and therefore their lies, deception, aggression, bias or secrecy can actually be excused because of the practical value of these acts and because the demands of virtue are quite difficult to qualify.
The Catholic Church maintained its philosophical beliefs and moral ground, albeit the upsurge of autonomous ethicists whose perception of morality is gauged on personal choices rather than on those revealed norm and values (Gula, 1989, p.1-4). This unfolds in a millennium where there is an increasing and strong bias on sectarianism and secularism in dealing with human concern, thus, relegated human experiences as inherently a dynamic interaction of rational morality; a contravention of ‘faith morality (Gula, 1989, p, 34).’ This essay will discuss about ‘reason informed by faith’, the moral issues commonly faced by Catholics with the rest of the humanity, and the distinctive quality o
What is needed is a foundation for morality that is rational and eternal. Philosophers have developed a number of ethical traditions. What these ethical traditions have in common is that each has a basic principle which is used to develop moral rules and which serves as the basis for moral judgments
The main body of the paper has shows the mortality and morbidity ratios for minorities and their health seeking way. A deep and probing inquiry on race along with reasons also discussed. The term 'race' is also been discussed as it appeared in formal English literature in 1580.
Allegories created within any kind of work can provide countless depths of meaning to even the most simple-sounding tale, yet the idea of what an allegory is frequently confounds people. For some, it is merely the relationship between a concrete
However, I do know that I will do my best to achieve what realistic goals I can set for myself or those that have been set by professionals in my field of study as moral guidelines.
In fact, I feel that those
The foundation of the modern society is based on the ongoing activities of socially diverse groups, and this whole process is perpetual in nature. Canada has long been the epitome of social diversity and has consistently displayed tolerance towards the diverse culture, religion, and race of its inhabitants.
Moralizing may be thought as an intellectual exercise, but more often, it is regarded as an attempt of making sense of individual’s gut instinct. Among people who employ morality normatively describes morality as a code of conduct, which
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Ethnic and morality for FREE!