Argumentation with thematic synthesis of materials - Essay Example

Nevertheless, issues arose in the U.S. against bilingual education for immigrants. Bilingualism activists argue that in teaching students in the country, teachers must use only the English language as the medium of instruction. Opponents on this argument stated that students must be taught through the use of their native languages before teaching and exposing them to mainstream English classes for in this way they can learn better, which is the primary benefit of bilingualism. However, using the English language as the primary medium of instruction can help immigrants to learn English and to effectively communicate with others; hence, this will present arguments against bilingualism.

Literature Review English is considered to be the universal language that is used by individuals from around the globe in order to effectively communicate with others despite of cultural differences. Thus, it is highly important for people to learn how to speak and manipulate the English language. As to M. Mujica, “children need to learn English to succeed in the real world today” (581). . By doing so, they will also be able to have greater chances towards achieving their goals and dreams in life.

With the help of the English language, they will be able to gain competitive advantage among other nations across the globe. Furthermore, bilingual activists further argued that U.S. must not learn to adjust on the language used by these immigrants. Instead, they must be the one to do the adjustments as they strive to live and start a new life in this foreign country. Part of which is to adopt and learn the English language. Immigrant children must be taught in school using English as the primary medium of instruction and not their native language.

Study showed that non-native English speaking children who were taught with the use of the English language from the very beginning learn better and faster as compared to children, who were taught by their native language or bilingualism, before emerging them to mainstream English classes. Activists stated that to avoid confusions in the minds of these immigrant children and to help them to adjust in the norms and standards of the new society they are in, they must learn to adopt the English language (B.

Mujica 152). Thereby, allowing non-native English speaking students to learn English effectively as they grow older. Nevertheless, opponents of the English Only movement, headed by James Fallows, strongly argued that teaching non-English speaking students with their native language or using bilingual education will help them in learning and understanding better their lessons, allowing to them acquire outstanding academic performance in school. In this way, it would be easy for children to learn and understand English.

This will also serve as a stepping ground for these students in preparing themselves to English