Computer Forensics: Admissibility of Evidence in Criminal Cases - Annotated Bibliography Example

Computer forensics: Admissibility of evidence Newman, R. (2007). Computer Forensics: Evidence Collection and Management. New York: Auerbach Publications. In his book, Newman identifies the stipulations that govern Computer Forensics in different countries states worldwide. He explains that what may be regarded as a computer crime in one country may be acceptable in a different country. Through this discussion, the author brings in the topic of admissibility of evidence, to answer the question of whether evidence ought to be scrutinized based on its country of origin.

Newman then furthers the discussion by highlighting that wrong evidence can harm a court’s admissibility. This necessitates that a court seeks facts to support the premise that the evidence provided is indeed valid. To support his discussion, Newman analyzes past cases in which invalid evidence acted to ruin justice. The author furthers his discussion by illustrating the advantage of using the right procedure in determining the admissibility of evidence. For this, he also provides examples of past cases in which justice outdid trickery.

Newman also seeks to inform that Admissibility of a Court of law is established by evidence rules which demand that the accuracy of methods of evidence collection is known and the evidence is not ruined in the analysis process.The author concludes by restating the importance of ensuring that admissibility of evidence is guaranteed towards justice governance. In his book, Newman identifies the importance of admissibility of evidence to not only the verity of a forensic case, but also to the admissibility of the court.

The book Computer Forensics: Evidence Collection and Management is therefore valid to the topic; admissibility of evidence. ReferencesNewman, R. (2007). Computer Forensics: Evidence Collection and Management. New York: Auerbach Publications.