Zimbardo's Quiet Rage - Essay Example

The experimentation imitated the procedure used in outdated experiments. An outdated experiment is structured with both the dependent and independent variables, post-testing and pretesting. Finally, control groups and experimental groups. The prison replication, as seen in the documentary, was good experimentation for observational reasons and tested the theory that imprisonments can expose the most horrible characteristics in those who work in them and those imprisoned (Zimbardo).

Zimbardo and his partners defined the procedures they used to measure the forces of stress, evaluated the data gathered from questionnaires, and documented the communications of the securities and convicts (Zimbardo). The two components of analysis were imitations of a prescribed organization of the securities and the inmates. The respondents were asked questions concerning the experimentation and the process of conducting the research experiment. The experiment entailed the dependent and independent variables, working explanations for simulation purposes, and testing of hypothesis (Zimbardo).

This experimentation obeyed the measures used by the old-fashioned experiment. Some experiments do not have an investigational group and a control group. In the old research, research had no identifiable control group, but for the research purposes, it was assumed that the control group consisted of people who were not in jail and not exposed to such a cruel environment (Zimbardo). The experimental hypothesis was meant to measure the emotional effects of imprisonments on the entities based on the physical background or the prisoners themselves. The reason for the research was to pick healthy male individuals and discover the consequences of the physical environment in an isolated environment (Zimbardo).

The police arrested and took the prisoners to prison as presented in the video. This imitated prisoner’s feelings and the stares of observers and fellow citizens (Zimbardo). The securities wore khaki costumes and carried clubs, keys, handcuffs, and whistles. These uniforms demonstrated the rift of control that is current in real jails. It was significant to make the occurrence of being a convict as physical as possible. It appeared necessary to imitate an arrest, be attacked with a spray, and to undress and then put on a suit that superficially branded them as convicts.

From this experiment, it can be revealed that under extreme pressure the prisoner will do what is important to protect themselves (Zimbardo). The condition they stayed in displayed an abuse of authority from the securities and a collapse of solidarity between the convicts. It is clear that the convicts were desensitized and could not reflect themselves as human beings. They had increased in numbers and stayed in jail cells under the comprehensive rule of the securities. It is a demonstration of how it is simple for people to become wicked.

This imitation showed how the surroundings of the jail are harmful to the securities and the inmates. It demonstrated that jails or any formal captivity stress people's behavior making it difficult to stay in it. This experiment displayed that when a person is placed in extreme tension or stress they become defensive in order to remain alive (Zimbardo).

Conclusion
From this experiment, the researcher displayed that, it is important to have prison reforms and that jails are horrible homes for individuals (Zimbardo). They are dehumanizing and unsafe for the securities and prisoners. It is important to have a review of integrities in scientific research experiments conducted on individuals. The respondents were damaged and the scholars were too concerned to understand it. Fortunately, after six days, the experimentation was stopped and the individuals have all grown and give the impression of learning from the research experiment instead of it destroying them. It was also observed that the experiment got out of hand, the prisoners suffered and accepted brutal and embarrassing treatment at the hands of the securities and towards the end, many displayed severe sensitive annoyance.

The experimentation's result has been said to demonstrate the compliance and obedience of individuals when offered a legitimizing philosophy, fictional or unrealistic theorization philosophy, societal and official support. It is also used to demonstrate cognitive disagreement theory. Despite its dramatic consequences, the experiment was extensively criticized as being immoral. Zimbardo was not just an observer but manipulated the direction of the experimentation as its supervisor. Deductions and observations illustrated by the research experimenters were mainly subjective.

Other researchers claimed that research participants created their behavior depending on the expectations of the researcher, or formed it after stereotype conformist or formulaic concepts or images they knew (Zimbardo).  Therefore, the research participants were simply participating in role-playing. This research experiment has been criticized based on ecological validity. In that, the situations forced in the research experiment were subjective and have not associated with real prison circumstances, including participants wearing women's clothes, not using their real names, covering their faces, not looking through the window, and not wearing underclothes (Zimbardo). Zimbardo claimed that jail is a confounding and dehumanizing practice and it was crucial to ratify these measures to put the convicts in an appropriate framework of mind.       

 

Read More