The thesis cannot be much simpler than to present a case through this paper that smoking in public should be declared a crime all over the world and should be effectively banned. Measures that actually impact people’s lives like heavy fines should be put on the culprits, the…
But the topic here leaves no room for debate for the opposite side. How come there are any ‘pros’ of smoking in public?
A simple search on Google is enough to make one realize, smoking doesn’t really have a pro. Alright, a smoker might argue; the beautiful roll (cigarette) provides the necessary escape from problems (life). But dear smoker, no one asked you to drag everyone sitting at the bus stop to your beautiful fantasy world. Just let them stay in real life and not in the smoke world.
ScienceDaily is a popular source of research based news and in one of their post (2009), research shows that among younger individuals and nonsmokers, risk of heart attacks is considerably reduced when they don’t inhale passive smoke (public smoke from someone else sitting at a public place and having that ‘escape’ and insisting others to go on that roller coaster ride for free which reduces life by 11 minutes in a single ride).
ScienceDaily’s source for that news is American College of Cardiology. So ban on public smoking reduces heart attacks is a fact not some blogger’s hunch. This needs to be taken seriously by ‘smokriminals’ (short for smoker criminal).
The purpose for this thesis is not convince people or authorities through scientific data because there is plenty of that available from every credible/academic ‘.com’. Public smoking is a crime, and if a logical ground is established for that ‘fact’, it would have a better impact on everyone concerned.
A logical nugget in favor of the thesis statement; innocent bystanders, the nonsmokers never asked for that ‘free candy’, public-smokers need not to give the free samples. The logic is that every (almost every) smoker agrees that smoking has harmful effect on the body, they know it for a fact. And no matter how hardcore a smoker, he would never smoke near his own infant. ‘Your freedom ends where your nose ends’, and smoke from a cigarette extends to the nose of ...
Cite this document
(“Smoking in public Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/559409-smoking-in-public
(Smoking in Public Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
“Smoking in Public Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/559409-smoking-in-public.
Upon his arrival in 1610, CDC (2007) affirms that John Rolfe tried to farm smokable tobacco but from small-leafed Nicotiana Rustica which was grown by the Virginia Indians and by the time 1612 came, farms of Nicotiana Tabacum were widespread as Rolfe had obtained and planted the large-leafed Spanish Tobacco seed.
They used it to mark their important events like funerals and weddings. Lately, the common medium of smoking is through cigarettes. Others include pipes and cigars. Smoking is becoming more and more rampant and business men have found it to be an exceptionally lucrative business to engage in.
Cigarettes are dangerous and offensive to those people who are exposed in public places. The term, “in public,” implies shared space. It must be considered that there are ill people, infants and children, pregnant women, elderly people, valuable and contributing members of society, animals, birds, insects, trees, plants, and air in that shared space.
Health hazards include heart diseases, bronchitis, emphysema, and lung cancer. For the smoker, it is active smoking; while, for those around him it is called passive smoking, in which people inhale the smoke of cigarettes from a smoker present in the surrounding.
Smoke through traffic and cigarettes’ caused numerous diseases among the common men.
The movement for making NYC as smoking-free city started, and fruits of this movement were cherished in 2003. Government