In this light, religion can have many positive influences, it can uplift the soul, spur on artistic production, and cause people to lead more driven, purposeful lives. On the other hand, however, religion has also shown that it can be a destructive force on many different occasions. In his work, “The Art of Happiness,” the Dali Lama makes many claims about religion, but seems to fundamentally believe that religion has always been a positive influence on the world, saying, for instance, that “all world religions have, of course, provided tremendous benefit for millions of human beings throughout many centuries past” (Dali Lama, 296). When considering this claim, it is easy to oscillate drastically to one side or other of this argument. Someone seeking to defend religion would point at the acts of Mother Theresa, to the charity of religious organizations, and to the benefits that organized religion can give to people personally, such as peace and comfort. Detractors from religion, however, can point to the attacks of Sept. 11, or the Crusades, and decry religion as a destructive force that causes hatred and violence throughout world history. Neither of these answers are fully correct, however. Rather, religion often does not make a significant amount of difference in and of itself. Religious actions, either positive or negative, are often results of complex societal interactions rather than religious fervor: so the Dali Lama is incorrect, as I believe that religion has not been a consistently positive nor negative influence on the progress of world history. One of the first things that must be understood in this discussion is the relationship between religion and spirituality. Though these are very closely linked ideas, “the Dali Lama distinguishes between spirituality and religion” (294). This is because spirituality and religion happen on very differ planes – spirituality is a personal, though often sometimes communal thing, that has to do fundamentally with belief in the underlying structures of the world, and one’s place within them. Religion, though resting on spirituality, is a very different thing. It is a structured organization that codifies beliefs and practices, almost like creating rules and laws for spirituality. This difference is important because many of the impulses often attributed to religion may in fact be spiritual. Altruism, for instance, is often one of the things most lauded about religious people and institutions. But there are obviously many people who are altruistic without being religious – they do good out of a fundamental belief that it is good to do so, which is much more akin to spirituality than religion, while there are also certainly religious people and institutions that are far from being altruistic. So when analyzing the impact that religion has had on the world, one must isolate the religious side – the order and structure of beliefs and actions, from the spiritual side. Upon parsing the actions of a religion or religious institution from the actions based on spirituality, one might be immediately drawn to condemning religion whole-heartedly. Religions and their institutions have been guilty of many grave sins that immediately spring to mind. Current, organized Islamic leaders have called for terrorist attacks and Martyrdom, and the Westboro Baptist Church’s “God Hates Fags” campaign has disgusted people worldwide, many churches in the United States were associated with hate crimes against blacks during and before the civil rights ...
Cite this document
(“The History of Religion and Religious Conflict Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/63104-the-history-of-religion-and-religious-conflict
(The History of Religion and Religious Conflict Essay)
“The History of Religion and Religious Conflict Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/63104-the-history-of-religion-and-religious-conflict.
Give one example from (1) the pre-nationalistic colonial period (e.g., Orientalism) and one example from (2) the nationalist period. The change in the relationship between science and religion in Asia during colonial and anti – colonial period was indeed noteworthy and remarkable.
Truth behind religion is treated as universal and eternal, essentially a question of faith, and widely accepted and not challenged or questioned in general. In case of science, the authority is based on evidence and reasons.
Generally, science is understood as the study of empirically observable things in the world, while religion entails mainly to what is unobservable and immaterial and they cannot be detected by senses (Harrison, 2010). All arguments and evidence on these two subjects have shown that there is a very strong rivalry between them.
Religion is a collection cultural systems, traditional systems, personal beliefs that join humanity to spirituality. Essentially, religion is supposed to be an answer to the many challenges that people go through in the world today. Some ask whether religion causes war while others ponder on whether it is the management the religious affairs, (Cavanaugh 51-62).
In the contemporary era scientists offer clear and logical explanations for the evolution of life, the formation of the solar system, etc. In the face of such indisputable scientific evidence, it is no longer possible to accommodate religious dogma. Religious fundamentalism or the literal interpretation of scriptures offered a degree of solace to primitive people when their lives and livelihoods were under constant threat from natural disasters, epidemic diseases and barbaric warfare.
There are two types of Christians, those with Christ in their hearts and the second category with just the cross dangling on their necks! Nowhere in Christianity or in the Bible has it been stated that the basis of religion propounded by Lord Christ relates to the color of the skin – white, black or brown.
Religious conflict and violence has long been one of the causal mechanisms behind which individuals have come to a level of disagreement which ultimately transforms into bloodshed. Even a cursory review of history reveals the fact that religious confrontation, and all of its various forms, has brought about conflict to a greater degree than any other mechanism throughout the course of history.
Lebanon is an Arab country located in the Middle East and it shares borders with Syria, Israel, and Jordan. Lebanon was known as the Paris of Middle East because it was so multi-cultural. Its population used to be half Muslim and half Christian and they generally lived peacefully with each other for hundreds of years, sharing everything and even marrying between each other.
nalyzing scientific evidences in comparison with religious dogma, this paper will present balance examination without prejudice for the purpose of finding out the truth. Both science and religion are important aspects of human lives. Consideration of this important issue will
Science is based on physical or experimental evidence while religion is based on beliefs obtained from holistic readings.
One scientific discovery criticized for its religious appropriateness is human evolution. Science describes evolution as a way that man
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic The History of Religion and Religious Conflict for FREE!