The jury in the case was torn in handing a unanimous guilty verdict to a boy who allegedly killed his father because that would mean an automatic death sentence. The sole dissenter, Juror 8 had successfully convinced the jury for a thorough discussion after a…
The courthouse of which the movie was filmed was filled with 12 men all who seem to be of the same race and of the same general age. It seems that the only difference between the jurors are their social and economic backgrounds which the movie had illustrated on it could influence a person’s mindset and judgment. For example, Juror 5 shared the “slum upbringing “ as the young boy being charged, that allowed him to relate to his living conditions but other juror like Juror 4 seemed to judge the boy harshly based on where he was raised. Juror 4 even as far to say… “ If you live in slum you become slum”. These statements indicates the biases of the jurors due to their backgrounds that reflect in their faulty reasoning as well as their erroneous judgment. When these prior biases and prejudices were overcome however, the jury begins to realize the error in their reasoning that finally led them to vote for non-conviction of the boy.
They are many reasoning and thinking errors in film. Some of the thinking errors identified in the movie, “12 angry men” was being closed-minded, being prejudice and being impatient. We identify these as thinking errors because it demonstrates how our faulty judgment just like the case of the jurors are influenced by their background to erroneously judge the case of the boy. As an example of the thinking error of being impatient was when one of the jurors does not want to engage in a lengthy discussion about the case for fear of running late for the baseball game. Another thinking error in the film was being closed-minded and prejudice. This was shown in the case of Juror 3 whose estranged relationship with his son affected his judgment in the case of wanting to convict the suspect just because of his strained relationship with his son. Another is juror 10 who is prejudiced against the slums dwellers as killers and people ...
Cite this document
(“12 Angry men Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/751288-12-angry-men
(12 Angry Men Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“12 Angry Men Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/751288-12-angry-men.
12 Angry Men and the Psychology of the Jury Room Twelve men, all of them strangers to one another, are shut up in a small, hot room to decide the fate of a young man from the slums. They literally hold the man’s life in their hands—if they vote guilty, he will be put to death for the crime of which he is accused.
This dramatic representation of what occurs on a hot afternoon in a jury room following a disturbing murder case in which a young boy faces life in prison or execution does not contain any of the flashy car chases or steamy love scenes that its competitors offered to audiences, but it does offer a great deal of insight into the workings of the human mind as it functions in relation to others.
12 Angry Men Introduction The movie “12 Angry Men” (1957) by Brian Rathjen, deals with a case of capital murder involving a youth of Spanish- American dissent. The chief premise of this movie is to prove his guilt or innocence in front of a deliberating jury.
The jury then right away goes into the jury room and starts deliberations. It becomes obvious early on into the discussions, that more than a few of the men have a lot of personal prejudices that have a great effect on their decision.
ions for Academy Awards including Best Picture, Best Director and Best Adapted Screenplay.1 In the years following, the film has not seen much additional success, but has maintained a firm grip on its position as social commentary and innovative production techniques as it did
It is the duty of the jury to come up with a unanimous decision whether to acquit or convict the Hispanic. The movie is famous for the use of a single set. The entire movie was filmed in a single jury room with the exception of three
He does this by successfully convincing the other 11 members of the jury to buy his idea of “burden of proof” concerning the evidence presented against the accused.
The defendant is accused of having murdered his vicious father. When the
The characteristics of group dynamics applicable to this case include personality conflicts, the operation of the jurors’ minds and their joint effort in determining the truth. The movie represents an entire spectrum of humanity, from the
A variety of evidence-based analysis of the case lead to their decision as observed through the use of verbal and non-verbal communication cues. The main character is convinced that people from slum backgrounds "are liars and are wild and dangerous". This portrays the organizational behavior he familiarizes himself with socially.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic 12 Angry men for FREE!