Different studies conducted in different states have concluded differently about the deterrent effects of death penalty, which makes it difficult to deduce the effectiveness of capital punishment (Durlauf, Fu, and Navarro 1). Despite the subjectivity of its effectiveness from statistical observation, and the fact that death penalty is the harshest of all punishments that can be possibly given to the criminals, its usefulness and effectiveness in establishing peace in the society cannot be denied. Spending millions of dollars on death penalty is worth it because it is really effective in reducing crime rate, establishing the right justice system, and inculcating fear of law in the criminals.
Capital punishment eradicates the possibility for the same criminal to reengage in crime ever. It is as simple as this; no more criminal means no more crime. Every criminal that is released from prison after completing the assigned duration of imprisonment carries the possibility of reengaging in crime. In fact, many criminals do reengage in crime. After their release, they are exposed to the same environmental, social, and cultural factors that convinced them to commit the crime before. This is the reason why many criminals are returning prisoners. Death penalty provides the most effective solution against crime recurrence.
There is no recompense as fair as death penalty for certain crimes. The relatives of a person who has been murdered mostly want nothing less than murder of the murderer. The criminal deserves to be given death penalty because he/she has caused the same to someone else; “if those murdered are the sort inclined to forgive those who injure them, their murderers can take comfort that on dying they might be forgiven and at one, in the sense of having a morally balanced relationship restored, with their victims” (Aspenson 104). Fair judicial system demands that a criminal is granted punishment commensurate with the weight of the ...
Cite this document
(“Is the death penalty effective (argument) Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/english/761171-is-the-death-penalty-effective-argument
(Is the Death Penalty Effective (argument) Essay)
“Is the Death Penalty Effective (argument) Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/english/761171-is-the-death-penalty-effective-argument.
Therefore, the best action to take in dealing with the capital offenders should not be death penalty. This will give room for reformation of these law breakers. In addition, human beings make laws and it is in such a way that they can be redesigned to enhance democracy in the whole world.
At the beginning of the 20th century, nearly all countries practiced some form of capital punishment, but it is no longer used in most countries (Stearman, 2007). The benefits and drawbacks of the death penalty are debated widely. Can it ever be justified?
Death penalty is defined as the use of death to punish criminal law offenders. It has been applied as a form of punishment since the colonial era. Recent statistics on the crime rate indicate that the death penalty is ranked amongst the least effective measures for curbing crime.
To counter this argument, lawmakers cite that capital punishment could lessen the crime rate of a particular country. Death Penalty: Not a Deterrent to Crime Death penalty is just the same with the other kinds of punishment. It only induces fear but does not really prevent one from committing an offense.
The Death Penalty is also known as “Capital Punishment”. It can be explained as the legal or official killing of a person by the state or government as a punishment for serious criminal misconduct (Seiter, Corrections: An Introduction, 2011, p.473). The topic of Capital Punishment or the Death Penalty has been a major issue for years dating back to the olden days.
Nonetheless, over the years many countries have abolished the practice referring to it as inhuman. However, there are countries like the USA and China still practicing the act to date claiming that other criminals will be scared to commit similar crimes in fear of death penalty.
Supporters believe that the penalty is justified (at least for murderers) by the principle of retribution, that life imprisonment is not an equally effective deterrent, and that the death penalty affirms the right to life by punishing those who violate it in the most strict form.
It should be made clear that while the arguments of activists and liberal touch the very soul of every human being, facts should still be the foremost basis of judicial decisions. As crime continues to permeate society, it becomes the moral and just obligation of government to adopt death penalty as a punishment for heinous crimes because the government has the primary obligation to protect its citizens in the best possible ways known to it.
The best way to punish for crimes is not capital punishment. Killing someone who has killed is just making an addition to the number of deaths. After all, it would not mean the end of crime. For a fact therefore, death punishment only makes the situation
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Is the death penalty effective (argument) for FREE!