What is the state of corporate governance in the UK, USA, EU, Australia, Japan and the GCC countries?

What is the state of corporate governance in the UK, USA, EU, Australia, Japan and the GCC countries? Literature review example
Masters
Literature review
Finance & Accounting
Pages 35 (8785 words)
Download 0
Corporate governance, from an overall perspective, can be viewed as an umbrella term, which encompasses various dimensions associated with theories, concepts and activities of the board of directors, their non-executive and executive directors…

Introduction

It a discipline that focuses mainly on existing relationships between a company’s top management, its stockholders, boards, regulators, other stakeholders and auditors, and is a “system by which companies are directed and controlled” (Corporate Governance, nd., p.11). The system takes into account various market and regulatory structures, while also considering objectives for governing business firms. As OECD framed it, “Corporate governance involves a set of relationships between a company’s management, its board, its shareholders and other stakeholders. Corporate governance also provides the structure through which the objectives of the company are set, and the means of attaining those objectives and monitoring performance are determined” (OECD, 2004, p. 11). ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Corporate governance
There is no set definition of corporate governance and mostly depends upon the specific country’s view and oversight of the issue. Generally, it is known as a system of rules and principles as to how an organization should be governed and controlled. The roots of corporate governance lie in ‘Agency Theory’, which explains the problem of principal-agent. The managers or agents are bestowed…
corporate governance
It is consisted of rules, which govern the relationships between stakeholders, shareholders and management (Ching et al, 2006). In the 1980s and early 1990s, some huge corporate scandals shocked the entire commercial world. Majority of the investors had lost their confidence over management of their investments; the entire commercial world was filled with distrust. To control this damage,…
corporate governance
Cadbury Report highlights the role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Chairman must not be allowed to become CEO and the same is applicable to the vice versa at the same. The Chairman is primarily responsible for the board’s working, and for its membership balance subject to board and approval of shareholders (ecgi, web). The Greenbury report focuses on the directors’ remuneration…
International corporate governance
he corporate sector of Australia has previously been regarded to hold the same core features as those of the United States and the United Kingdom.7 These issues will be discussed thoroughly in the later sections.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE UK CODE OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The paper reviews the development of corporate governance and the outcomes of the changes since 1990 to the culmination of a combined code in 2003, and the impact of the recent bank crisis on corporate governance structures (Lee 2006, p.36). The rise of Corporate Governance Since the 1980s, corporate governance issues have continued to attract immense interests. Issues such as corporate fraud,…
corporate governance
The Fraud was first discovered when its budget and financial Analyst Kim Emigh blew the whistle in December of 2000 when he asked engineers in Richardson, Texas unit and elsewhere to stop charging their time for long term projects to capital expenditures (Young 2002). It was also when he told his accounting manager Frank Guckes after receiving an email to charge it to another account that it is…
Corporate Governance in Gulf countries: The Effects on firms' performance
This falls within the Corporate Governance guidelines on size of boards. The number of executive directors on the board averaged 0.76 with a standard deviation of 0.83. Some years recorded the highest number of 8 executive board members while some had none of their board members being an executive. This means that some of the firms did not have their CEOs as board members. It is therefore…