Making decision on various issues concerning life is one area human beings continue to experience unending dilemma especially with regard to judging what is right or what is wrong. The way this has become a problem can be captured in the overall nature humankind regard and value life. In this way, physician-assisted suicide has become an ethical problem that modern society has to continue and prolong debate on it. It is within this purview that effort will be made at looking at the issue of physician-assisted suicide within the chaotic human environment of ethical inclination and freedom of right to choice and self-determination. Questions about this concept are many: is it right or is it wrong; should it be accepted; and also should medical practitioners get involved.
Some societies in western countries and America are today painstakingly grappling with the issue of physician assisted suicides as it become more controversial and challenging with each passing day. Death and process of dying remain one of the fiercest debates societies in western countries are living with and answers to this debate remain scanty if not illusionary. Imageries of death and the process of dying remains candid on the media and other avenues of social networks and in large measures, the imageries have been stimulated and ingrained with prevalence of diseases in society such as HIV/AIDS, heart diseases, cancer and even traumatic injuries. (Morrison and Monagle, 2009). Physician-assisted suicide enjoys little legal acceptance, a situation that has also infected larger religious and ethics bodies in many countries who continue to sternly oppose the practice. Nevertheless, in societies like America public opinion polls have been carried out severally on the issue and results have indicated a divided society on the issue. For example, about 37% of the population have expressed their support for the practice, 33% have indicated support for the practice but under a wide variety of circumstances, and lastly, 30% have totally opposed the practice under any circumstances (Morrison and Monagle, 2009). What this shows is that physician-assisted suicide constitutes both right and wrong answers while on the other hand there is still dilemma among some people on the practice as it continues to become part of society. Morrison and Monagle (2009) provides definition and characterization of physician-assisted suicide as the situation the patient seeks or is advised professionally to intentionally and willfully end his or her life. Therefore, this is a situation that involves the patient and the third part who in most cases is a medical practitioner. The medical practitioner become central to the patient in terms of providing assistance that may be in form of: information, means of committing suicide, and also aiding the patient indirectly in the act of committing suicide. Therefore a physician can be perceived to provide both tangible and intangible materials that the patient need for suicide to be done, and
Cite this document
(“Physician-Assisted Suicide Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/health-sciences-medicine/1651-physician-assisted-suicide
(Physician-Assisted Suicide Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words)
“Physician-Assisted Suicide Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/health-sciences-medicine/1651-physician-assisted-suicide.
Cited: 0 times
Society is regarded to be one big area that accommodates people with different social, cultural, psychological, political and economic values who also intermingle frequently. Their idea of life and interpretation of it may largely differ from that of the other person and in most cases, what is regarded to be right or wrong has never enjoyed consensus. …
This has been a great source of debate all over the world, especially in the legal, medical, and ethical fields where the practice has either received plenty of support or has been vilified as being unethical and at other times being inhuman. Others have come to take a neutral stand concerning the procedure, taking a wait and see approach to the issue because it is still one that is undergoing debate.
The author states that one of the debates against the idea of physician-assisted suicide is because there is a belief that it will open the door to abuses. The true desires of the patient would be subverted to a system in which assisted suicide was a viable course of treatment, thus creating a pressure on patients to make use of this treatment.
This may take the form of a physician providing a patient with information about lethal dose and sleeping pills while knowing that the prescription may lead to the patient’s death. Much as it is tragic, its proponents argue that some patients may end up deciding that death is the best option instead of undergoing such a miserable and painful experience.
She has also pointed out that in 2006 the Supreme Court supported the Oregon's physician-assisted suicide law, which allows terminal patients to seek the services of PAS legally. As the name indicates, Physician-assisted suicide, or mercy killing, is the termination of life with the help of a physician.
Those against this practice on the other hand state that it is unethical for physicians to help their patients commit suicide when they have taken the Hippocratic oath to protect and preserve the lives of their patients. Both sides of this debate have made some very pertinent arguments in support of their sides and it has been very difficult for many societies and people to come to an understanding concerning this matter.
However, regardless of what definition the process itself seeks to define, the reality of the fact is that a certain level of ethics, legalities, and contentious debate exists in surround such an option. As a function of analyzing these factors, the preceding analysis will seek to demonstrate to the reader how each of these determinants impact upon the way in which physician-assisted suicide is practiced and viewed within the current society.
Behind us we leave a legacy of new generations, happy memories, and a fulfilling life. Unfortunately, in a modern era filled with warfare, criminal acts, and ever more virulent and dangerous diseases many of us may find our lives end quite differently. People are faced with realization that a diagnosed illness will end their lives every day.