How the holocaust explodes the concept of mass crime - Book Report/Review Example

How the holocaust explodes the concept of mass crime. Introduction The Holocaust is the expression applied to illustrate the systematic and extensive slaughter of the European Jewry by the Nazis and respective collaborators throughout the Second World War. Approximately 65% of European Jewry died between 1939 and 1945 (Berenbaum & Peck, 2002).Beyond a crimeThe Holocaust events can be termed as something so massive that categories are irrelevant since it does not fit a crime description. In the film Schindler’s List, Steven Spielberg implies that even in the heart of darkness, sight of death camps, the alternative of harboring the Nazis murder machine can never be forgotten and understood (Bartov, 1996).

The views that have been given to Holocaust comprise an intrinsically inevitable, unstoppable, fateful event that surpassed human urgencies’ control except its own apocalyptic end. Both bystanders and perpetrators could collaborate in finding a solution though they chose not to, and victims could do nothing to save one another. The victims were left to fate, and no survival mean was available for any of them. It is recorded that bystanders’ active campaign or passive observation could have assisted to save at least some victims, but no one dared to seek that option.

The post-Holocaust analyst asserted that it was a situation of evil triumphs over good (Bartov, 1996). The events left Holocaust’s victims to fate and making them concerned, and accept the triumphs of evil as they faced their fate. The Holocaust’s perpetrators were the executioners of evil and victors.ConclusionThe events of Holocaust cannot be categorized as crime since the magnitude of inhumanity, and beastly activities witnessed then are beyond comprehension. ReferencesBartov, O. (1996).

Murder in our Midst: The Holocaust, Industrial killing, and representation. New York: Oxford University Press, 251pp.Berenbaum, M., & Peck, A. J. (2002). The Holocaust and history: The known, the unknown, the disputed, and the reexamined. Bloomington [u.a.: Indiana Univ. Press.