Human Rights Standards - Essay Example

 It is always the responsibility of the prosecution to have tangible evidence against the accused in a criminal case. This implies that the prosecution must confirm beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused had committed the unlawful act to warrant him or her criminal charges. This is in order to avoid undermining the presumption of innocence and to reinforce the prosecution’s case. Similarly, a trial judge’s direction to the jury is nonjudgmental and not mandatory as per the law.

This implies that the jury is at liberty to establish that the accused had acted with objective founded on the evidence presented at trial. The court should ensure that it upholds the human rights of the accused to access fair trial and prove his or her innocence. The jury needs to gather enough evidence that finds the accused to be on the wrong of committing the unlawful act.