A critical review of Kosovo Is Not Serbia - Assignment Example

A critical review of Kosovo Is Not Serbia The central theme of the article is that of living in one’s country and not dying for the country. Addressing the entire world, the author supports the argument with substantive evidence and examples drawn from two countries. The article presents a compulsion between two cities; Kosovo and Serbia. He gives a detailed account of the two nations and supports his argument with substantive evidence. The author demonstrates that the Kosovo citizens are discriminated upon entry to America, while the Americans are treated like popes in Kosovo.

The article shows that Kosovo faces problems like unemployment, alcoholism corruption and smuggling of people. However, the city still has something to be proud of, the mosque and the films industry coupe with the soap opera. However, the author fails to explain why Kosovo people are not allowed in America. Additionally he presents a picture of Americans discriminating Kosovo people. What he fails to address is what kind of life do the American live in Kosovo. In his discussion of soap operas that are managed by women, the author fails to explain the role of men in the same films.

Furthermore, the article seems to criticize the films more and provide their transformations without giving the positive aspects of the soap opera. In discussing the situation in Serbia, the author provides the current status of Serbia. The article demonstrates that The Serbian language is no longer widely spoken. The county has been taken up by English men. The article notes that with almost every Serb ethnically cleansed, there's nobody left to speak it. The author further notes that Serbia lies in ruins.

There are just empty Orthodox churches turned into tourist attractions while the town abounds with pizza and burger joints with English-language menus. Serbia too faces her challenges including traffic jam. However, the author seems to be biased in the discussion of the two countries. The article speaks much better of Kosovo than Serbia. For instance, the author blames Serbia for Kosovo’s problems. The author speaks of “the war crimes committed by Serbian military forces against the Albanian population, which led to the bombings by NATO in 1999” (Tesanovic Pg. 1, 2014). He did give any instance when Kosovo did something negative or inhumane.

Throughout the discussion, there is underlying information that does not come out clearly. This is the primary intention of the author. Closely looking at his closing remarks, the author seems to preach of fascism or extreme nationalism. However, this nationalism is at the expense of other nations. The above is because he does not speak well of other nations. The author seems to blame all other nations for Kosovo problem. The author appears to be so biased and not objective at all. He ought to have considered all side of the coin.

That is discussing both the positive and negatives of the three nations in question. Furthermore, his writing style is somehow complicated to comprehend. The author is not systematic at all. The article seems to move forward backward because the points are not clearly presented. The article starts by looking entry into Kosovo then Brazil then America all in one paragraph. The above even confuses the reader more. In his writing, he incorporates his emotion. He seems to be so compassionate with Kosovo thus this cannot be termed as a scholarly article.

Lastly, his discussion raises the question of healing and reconciliation especially after wars and genocides. More so globalization and Transcultural appreciation are raised.ReferenceTesanovic, J. (2014). Kosovo Is Not Serbia. World Post