StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Identification Evidence Used by Mr Justice JA Lee - Case Study Example

Summary
From the paper "The Identification Evidence Used by Mr Justice JA Lee" it is clear that the Royal commissioner relied on hearsay, but if it was through the law of evidence from the Evidence Act, 1995, there could have been a thorough investigation for identification of the accused…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful

Extract of sample "The Identification Evidence Used by Mr Justice JA Lee"

Identification Evidence Name Institution Introduction Identification evidence is evidence used in the court whereby the suspect is claimed to have been see do the crime. This is where witnesses are used to identify the person through a parade, photos, videotapes, or through a word of mouth where the witness claims to have seen the person on the occasion of the crime or the accused used him or her to hand over the stolen goods. It is clear that, identification evidence is not highly reliable in a court of law because it might be biased from pressure exerted to the witness by other people. This paper critically explores the identification evidence used in the case of Harold Blackburn whereby the police officer relied upon Mr Thornthwaite’s hunch and the commissioner made charges from observations on identification evidence. The identification evidence gathered and relied upon by the Blackburn investigators when charging Harold Blackburn was not genuine. This is because Mr Thornthwaite’s hunch was just to target the suspect. It is noticeable that, the police had not yet gotten reliable evidence and that is why they just decided to rely on guesswork rather than carrying out full investigation to get a genuine evidence (Flowe, Mehta, & Ebbesen, 2011, 140). However, this evidence never relied on facts but intuitions. Mr. Justice claimed that, there was visual identification of the suspect and that is why he was arrested and charged in a court of law. Investigators to Mr. Harold Blackburn’s relied upon a poor evidence because they only took the identification evidence as the final evidence, but failed to investigate at the suspect’s premises or doing some forensic investigation to get a real evidence. It is widely realized that, identification evidence might be biased because individuals from the public might come out and claim that, they saw Mr. Harold Blackburn steal the claimed things, but it might not be true. According to Justice McHugh in the Australian case of Festa v R, there are different forms of identification evidence; that is, a witness claiming to had seen the accused in the respective occasion as per the charge, and when a witness claims to have been used by the accused to carry the stole things (McCartney, 2013, 71). Another form of identification evidence is whereby the accused is associated with some characteristics of the person known to have committed the criminal act. Mr Justice J.A.Lee, Royal Commissioner associated the evidence used to accuse Harold Blackburn with identification evidence. This might be because some witnesses came out and claimed to had seen the accused do the crime and this marks the admissibility of the specific evidence. There was no expert opinion that was involved in this case whereby admissibility of the evidence was not followed (Bergsmo, 2014, 305). According to the investigation done, there were no facts to prove that Harold Blackburn was involved in the crime because they did not involve an expert whose opinion could have been based on experience and knowledge. The investigators of this case might have made some assumptions in their opinion but fail to apply the necessary reasoning while making their conclusion about Harold Blackburn being the suspect. However, the opinion of the investigators seems to had not disclosed relevant reasoning, thus failure to try the possible facts. According to the argument put forth by Thompson, Kaasa and Peterson (2013, 372), assumption rule does not fit in proving the admissible evidence because it only relies on the opinion that fails to be accompanied with some critical reasoning. It is clear that, the court was only informed about the findings of the investigators, but never compared the subject matter of such evidence with the facts. According to the Australian law of evidence, truth is very necessary when making conclusion in order to regulate the entire admissibility of the respective evidence. Real evidence is required to prove the case, but this was not what happened in the case of Harold Blackburn (Roberts, & Zuckerman, 2010, 17). This is because the investigators only relied on hunch, but not facts when giving the findings to the commissioner who charged the suspect in the court of law. It is widely known that for all evidence given, the witnesses must do so on oath. Whenever a document is associated with a person in examination like in the case of Harold Blackburn, that document seems to have been made admissible through the given evidence (Julian, Kelty, Roux, Woodman, Robertson, Davey, & White, 2011, 224). The relevant evidence that accompanied this case had to be admissible because it is applied in identifying whether the victim is guilt or not, unless the rule of law fails to permit admission of relevance of the given evidence. The Royal Commissioner seemed to have relied on the identification evidence while charging the accused and this should not be the case. It is widely realized that, identification evidence contains a lot of hunch rather than facts and should not be relied upon when making charges against the suspect. There are genuine reasons from McHugh and Gummow JJ in Bulejcik v R from the Australian Case for not relying on identification evidence in making judgments (Bergsmo, 2014, 306). It s clear that, different witnesses might have different stories to tell regarding the same case, they might also be reacting in very different manner, and some witnesses might be confused (Robertson, 2012, 80). Ultimately, identification evidence is highly associated with the witness being influenced by other people from the public, maybe the people claiming to have their things being stolen. In this case, the Commissioner relied on identification evidence as the only evidence to make charges to Mr. Harold Blackburn and there was no genuine evidence from the investigators who only relied on Mr Thornthwaite’s hunch rather than looking for the facts associated with Blackburn’s issue. Reliability of the identification evidence used by the commissioner tends to be improved by some sections from the Evidence Act through imposition of specific procedures adopted during the process of identifying the suspect. According to Evidence Act, it is the responsibilities of police officers to use a number of steps to enhance them rely on identification evidence. There should be images used, tape records, a number of photos placed together and looking almost alike, and an identification parade (Keane, & McKeown, 2012, 32). It is very important for the police officers to follow the right procedure to take the identification evidence whereby the suspect is requested to participate in a parade and the witness is allowed to identify the person. In this case, the Blackburn’s investigators never used such procedures in identifying Harold Blackburn as the suspect, but the entire investigation was shallowly done. Identification parade as per the Evidence Act 25/1995 (NSW) could have served as a reliable rather than relying on hunch where the witnesses claim to have seen Harold Blackburn do the act with no facts of the evidence (Brewer, & Wells, 2011, 25). From the Evidence Act, a systematic procedure is followed in the identification parade and the witness is provided the required security and support to be able to identify the suspect without fear. Some invited witnesses could have identified Harold Blackburn in the court of law, but there was no chance of in-court identification. In reference to R v Le, the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, it is very dangerous to undertake in-court identification when the defense counsel is not available to ask the victims questions for the witness to answer and meet the interests of the victims. It is apparent that, the Royal Commissioner relied on the hearsay evidence from the witnesses rather than having original evidence from investigation done by the Blackburn’s investigators. It is not clear if Mr. Harold Blackburn was at the location of the criminal incidence, because the police officers never got fact of him being the one who committed the crime. It is very clear that, the police officers had not gotten any evidence when they decided to rely upon Mr Thornthwaite’s hunch, but this was because they were targeting to accuse Harold Blackburn regardless the evidence (Robertson, 2012, 84). This shows that the judgment made by the Royal commissioner was not fair judgment because no investigation was done at the premises of the accused and the investigators never conducted some forensic investigation to gather more evidence. The Royal commissioner relied on hearsay, but if it was through law of evidence from the Evidence Act, 1995, there could have been a thorough investigation for identification of the accused. Conclusion In conclusion, the identification evidence used by Mr Justice J.A.Lee, Royal Commissioner in charging and arresting Harold Blackburn was not genuine and fairly investigated. It is evident that, the police officer relied upon Mr Thornthwaite’s hunch without following the facts of the case. Identification evidence could have been more reliable it is was accompanied with the Evidence Act, 1995, which could have improved the evidence from different formats of identification. There should be following of the right steps during identification of the suspect rather than applying guesswork to come up with some conclusions. References Flowe, H. D., Mehta, A., & Ebbesen, E. B. (2011). The role of eyewitness identification evidence in felony case dispositions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(1), 140. Thompson, W. C., Kaasa, S. O., & Peterson, T. (2013). Do Jurors Give Appropriate Weight to Forensic Identification Evidence?. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 10(2), 359-397. McCartney, C. (2013). Forensic Identification Criminal Justice. Routledge. Julian, R. D., Kelty, S. F., Roux, C., Woodman, P., Robertson, J., Davey, A., ... & White, R. (2011). What is the value of forensic science? An overview of the effectiveness of forensic science in the Australian criminal justice system project. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 43(4), 217-229. Keane, A., & McKeown, P. (2012). The modern law of evidence. Oxford University Press. Robertson, J. (2012). Forensic science, an enabler or dis-enabler for criminal investigation?. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 44(1), 83-91. Bergsmo, M. (2014). Australian & New Zealand Journal of. Journal of Criminology, 47(2), 305-306. Roberts, P., & Zuckerman, A. (2010). Criminal evidence. Oxford University Press. Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2011). Eyewitness identification. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 24-27. Read More

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Identification Evidence Used by Mr Justice JA Lee

DNA as Evidence: Skirting the Fallacies

Many lives, already rotting in prison houses for crimes they did not commit, were saved because of it and many victims of unsolved crimes are hoping that justice will still be theirs in the long run.... Jeffrey used the VNTR (or variable of number repeats) genotyping through the SLP (single locus probe) system [3].... In 1999, an expansion of the system was made with the introduction of the SGM Plus, an 11 loci system, and is presently the standard method being used in the UK....
16 Pages (4000 words) Essay

Clinical Judgement and Decision Making

Some of them are researched well with deep explanation and concrete evidence on facts.... The researcher of this descriptive essay mostly focuses on the discussion of the topic of clinical judgment and decision making and analyzing the different theories and approaches to the topic....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Should Evidence Be Excluded If Obtained Improperly by the Police

"Should Evidence Be Excluded If Obtained Improperly by the Police" paper discusses the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence presented by the police authorities to the courts of justice in line with the provisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, particularly S.... Thus, justice on the part of the victim could be obtained by merely proving the existence of probable cause against the suspect so that the police authorities could immediately act and apprehend the suspect for prosecution and trial....
32 Pages (8000 words) Coursework

Law in Relation to the Identification Procedure

This essay describes the law in relation to the identification procedure, the use of the listening equipment in the cells, and the planting of the police officer in the same cell as the defendant.... In relation to the identification process it will be necessary to discuss how this should have been conducted.... They've already messed up the identification parade.... At a police identification parade, Alan picks out Barry on the basis of his 'bulging eyes'....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

The Luggers versus the Butchers

Such negative workplace attitudes reflect issues of inequity and injustice and research stresses that “organizational peace, communication and justice perception are very important factors in order to be successful” (Ince & Gul, 2011, p.... The case study under observation in this paper reflects a wide range of problematic issues targeting Food Merchandising Corporation (FMC) most of which relate to poor management but some also relate to irresponsibility and unprofessionalism on behalf of the workforce....
20 Pages (5000 words) Case Study

Should Evidence Be Excluded if Obtained Improperly by the Police

The author of this paper discusses the admissibility of illegally obtained evidence presented by the police authorities to the courts of justice in line with the provisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE), particularly S.... Thus, justice on the part of the victim could be obtained by merely proving the existence of probable cause against the suspect so that the police authorities could immediately act and apprehend the suspect for prosecution and trial....
16 Pages (4000 words) Term Paper

American Constitution Law: Mock Judicial Decision

This is crucial because any successful criminal justice system should ensure that the treatment of each individual in the case is fair.... The author of the "American Constitution Law: Mock Judicial Decision" paper examines the case of an elderly man called mr.... n making this decision, it is crucial to look at evidence that can be used in this case.... In this case, the police used a device that is not common to the general public that made the search unlawful....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Biometric Technology: Fingerprints

"Biometric Technology: Fingerprints" paper focuses on the most effective criminal identifier by helping resolve the cases which went without justice in the past and the present cases as well.... They can also be used to identify people or deceased and thus unable to identify themselves in an aftermath of a natural disaster.... Fingerprints also used to act as signatures in ancient Babylon in the second millennium BCE in order to protect against forgery....
6 Pages (1500 words) Article
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us