Privity of Contract

High school
Case Study
Law
Pages 24 (6024 words)
Download 0
Privity of contract is a legal concept applicable principally to contracts involving the sale of goods or services. Privity of contract occurs only between the parties to a contract. A third party which, benefits under a contract does not have the right to proceed legally against the parties to the contract for entitlement in excess of its benefits as provided in the contract…

Introduction

This facet of the rule became a hindrance, where the contract was made to the benefit of the third party. Collateral warranties support the viability of this rule.
Prior to 1833 there existed decisions in English Law, which permitted enforcement of the provisions of a contract by persons not party to the contract. The doctrine of privity emerged together with the doctrine of consideration, which states that consideration must move from the promisee. That is if nothing is given for the promise of something to be given in return, that promise is not legally binding unless promised as a deed.
In the case of Price v Easton, where a contract was made for work to be done in exchange for payment to a third party. When the third party attempted to sue for the payment, he was held to be not privy to the contract, and as such his claim failed1.
This was completely linked to the doctrine of consideration and was established by the case of Tweddle v Atkinson, where the plaintiff was unable to sue the executor of his father-in-law, who had promised to the plaintiff's father to make payment to the plaintiff, because he had not provided any consideration to the contract. The husband's claim against his father - in - law's estate was dismissed on the grounds that no consideration had moved from the husband2.
The doctrine was further developed ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Construction Law and Safety
The offense is one of strict liability, which means that it does not matter if the statement was intentional or negligent, but, rather, just that the statement was made and that the statement was false. So, in this case, Jimmybuild Ltd., if they made a statement with regards to the condition of the building, any kind of statement to Nina along those lines, and did not mention the fact that the…
International Commercial Arbitration and Privity of Contract
What is international commercial arbitration? International commercial arbitration is a way in which parties can use an alternative method of dispute resolution on an international level. International law however does not clearly and concisely define what it is in reality.
The Doctrine of Privity of Contract and the Impact of the Contracts Act 1999
121, 1991) the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 which essentially modified the doctrine of privity of contract and confers upon third parties a limited right of action relative to a contract which confers upon the third party a benefit.
Common Law and the Doctrine of Privity
However, with implementation of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (hereafter “the Act”) many transformations have been witnessed, consequently enabling third parties to enforce terms in contracts. In essence, the common law is built on a number of key principles that stipulate that the third party cannot have rights or bear the liability upon a contract he is not a partisan. In…
Privity of Contract
This facet of the rule became a hindrance, where the contract was made to the benefit of the third party. Collateral warranties support the viability of this rule.…
Law of contract- Exclusion causes and privity
Failure to meet such obligations, they will be liable for any damage. Such liability is strictly for the parties involved in a contract in exclusion to any third parties. The privity doctrine therefore stipulates that only the parties in a given contract can sue or be sued regarding the contract. This gives two different principles that can be derived from the doctrine. One is that any person or…
Contract Law Master Case Study
This was also the case in Goedecke v Kirwan1where the Court found that an agreement on price was a necessary term of offer and acceptance; hence no final, enforceable contract existed since price had not been agreed upon. Thus Hilary may have some rights under the option, but they may not be fully enforceable.…