Privity of Contract - Case Study Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Privity of Contract

This facet of the rule became a hindrance, where the contract was made to the benefit of the third party. Collateral warranties support the viability of this rule.
Prior to 1833 there existed decisions in English Law, which permitted enforcement of the provisions of a contract by persons not party to the contract. The doctrine of privity emerged together with the doctrine of consideration, which states that consideration must move from the promisee. That is if nothing is given for the promise of something to be given in return, that promise is not legally binding unless promised as a deed.
In the case of Price v Easton, where a contract was made for work to be done in exchange for payment to a third party. When the third party attempted to sue for the payment, he was held to be not privy to the contract, and as such his claim failed1.
This was completely linked to the doctrine of consideration and was established by the case of Tweddle v Atkinson, where the plaintiff was unable to sue the executor of his father-in-law, who had promised to the plaintiff's father to make payment to the plaintiff, because he had not provided any consideration to the contract. The husband's claim against his father - in - law's estate was dismissed on the grounds that no consideration had moved from the husband2.
The doctrine was further developed ...
Download paper

Summary

Privity of contract is a legal concept applicable principally to contracts involving the sale of goods or services. Privity of contract occurs only between the parties to a contract. A third party which, benefits under a contract does not have the right to proceed legally against the parties to the contract for entitlement in excess of its benefits as provided in the contract…
Author : medhurstelian

Related Essays

Construction Law and Safety
The offense is one of strict liability, which means that it does not matter if the statement was intentional or negligent, but, rather, just that the statement was made and that the statement was false. So, in this case, Jimmybuild Ltd., if they made a statement with regards to the condition of the building, any kind of statement to Nina along those lines, and did not mention the fact that the foundation was defective, they would be liable under the Property Misrepresentations Act 1991. A statement that contains an omission would make Jimmybuild Ltd. liable under the Act, so, because any...
7 pages (1757 words) Essay
International Commercial Arbitration and Privity of Contract
What is international commercial arbitration? International commercial arbitration is a way in which parties can use an alternative method of dispute resolution on an international level. International law however does not clearly and concisely define what it is in reality.
14 pages (3514 words) Essay
The Doctrine of Privity of Contract and the Impact of the Contracts Act 1999
121, 1991) the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 which essentially modified the doctrine of privity of contract and confers upon third parties a limited right of action relative to a contract which confers upon the third party a benefit.
3 pages (753 words) Essay
Common Law and the Doctrine of Privity
However, with implementation of the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 (hereafter “the Act”) many transformations have been witnessed, consequently enabling third parties to enforce terms in contracts. In essence, the common law is built on a number of key principles that stipulate that the third party cannot have rights or bear the liability upon a contract he is not a partisan. In order to understand the privity doctrine, it is essential to first relate it to the law of contract. A contract is defined as a promise of exchange that is legally enforceable. Additionally, a...
7 pages (1757 words) Essay
Law of contract- Exclusion causes and privity
Failure to meet such obligations, they will be liable for any damage. Such liability is strictly for the parties involved in a contract in exclusion to any third parties. The privity doctrine therefore stipulates that only the parties in a given contract can sue or be sued regarding the contract. This gives two different principles that can be derived from the doctrine. One is that any person or entity who is not a party in the contract does not have rights to enforce the contract and also that such a person is not bound by a contract in which he is not a party. It confers no rights or...
8 pages (2008 words) Case Study
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!