Natural law and positivism - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Natural law and positivism

A segment of positivism purports that law and morality must operate separately. 'Natural law examines what the law should be' (Eglinton 2005). Eglinton states in his essay entitled Natural Law that 'Natural law overstates the relationship between law and morality, but positivism underestimates the importance of the relationship' (Eglinton 2005).
Professor Jeremy Waldron has his own views on rights and democracy and the way the government attempts to mandate them by the use of laws. Professor Waldron believes that rights of a society are first and foremost in everyone's mind. He believes that Majoritism has it place in society. Unlike his opponents, Professor Waldron believes that the fact that the government allows the majority of the population to make decisions regarding laws and policies does not impede on the minority. His view is that the minority population is also considered because they too have been given the opportunity to choose or elect the officials that institute laws and policies. Waldron believes that although there are instances when democratic societies will implement laws that will infringe on the rights of the minority that the democratic process itself does not allow for the majority to be 'tyrants' to the minority. ...
Download paper


Natural law and positivism, as they are related to fundamental rights and democracy, sparks debates on many levels. Before exploring the various viewpoints of these two rules or theories, it may be worth exploring the relationship between the two. Natural law is by definition a set of ethical rules that people use to govern themselves…
Author : msteuber

Related Essays

The Application of Positive Law: a Moral Process?
Positivism thus fundamentally strikes a major distinction between ideology and law and claims that only law can provide the adequate grounds for making legal decisions (Kennedy, 1997: 24-25). Therefore the distinction that positivism makes also establishes a difference between legal and non-legal principles, in that the former is represented by posited law and the latter by moral valuations. The core of positivism is based on the assumption that morality does not and can not exist on a universal or objective level. This is because concepts of right and wrong are only located in individual...
6 pages (1506 words) Essay
Law Discussion: Jurisprudence
In this regard, the task of lawyers and judges is to apply positive law. As a result, they do not concern themselves with questions of whether that law is just or unjust. From the natural law perspective, laws are intended to enforce moral codes.2 Thus if, the lawyers and judges are required to apply and interpret natural law, it would be up to them to determine that which is just or unjust. The main question is therefore whether or not lawyers and judges are required to apply and interpret positive or natural law. Positive law is perceived as the antithesis of natural law which in turn...
8 pages (2008 words) Essay
'Crime is a Symptom of Wider Malaise' - from the Perspective of Positivism and the One Other Criminological Theory
Crime is described in a sociological aspect, the behavior that infringes criminal law. It can be described in the course of laws, through official police reports of crime, or in the course of victimization surveys of people who are concerned about it, but possibly not involved with the department of police. In addition to this, “Crime consists of three principle divisions, 1. the sociology of law, which is an attempt to systematically analysis the conditions under which criminal laws develop and also an explanation of variations in the policies and procedures used in the administration of...
12 pages (3012 words) Essay
Jurisprudence: Positivism and the Tradition of Austin
Positivism and the Tradition of Austin In H.L.A. Hart’s critique of the legal philosophies of Bentham and Austin, Hart explains that these two men saw that laws as they are should be distinguished from laws as they should be. In other words, there is a distinction between law and morality, and a separation between the two. That said, Hart declares that Austin and Bentham also engage in legal positivism, in that the law as it is (law), and law as it ought to be (Law), is separated.1 Austin sees that there are laws which are based upon morality, such as those based upon God’s laws, and then...
10 pages (2510 words) Essay
Legal positivism
Due to space constraints, this paper focuses only on Hart's version of legal positivism and Dworkin's attack of Hart's particular version. These two theorists are chosen because of the prominence of the Hart/Dworkin debate....
9 pages (2259 words) Essay
“The natural law tradition is prey to objections from both moral sceptics and legal positivists. There is no moral truth against which human laws can be judged and, in any case, laws are made by humans and are not answerable to any objective conception
The main natural law theorists include Aristotle, St. Thomas Aquinas, and Plato. These theorists argue that any law can only be legitimate and just if such laws promote common good. However, on the other side, the Legal Positivists including H.L.A. Hart, John Austin, and Thomas Hobbes, argue that legitimate laws are those that have been enacted through effective and proper channels with persons with powers to so despite the content of such laws (Curran, 2006; Pg. 611). Despite the contributions of these theorists and their critics, it is worth noting that each contributor seeks to determine...
5 pages (1255 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!