Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Proponents of the Defamation Act 2013 hailed it as a milestone for freedom of expression. In light of this, critically consider whether and to what extent the Act has the effect that is attributed to it. - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Author : daryl44


Before this, England was mainly seen as a claimant friendly nation. This is because when someone considered that his or her rights were being violated…

Extract of sample
Proponents of the Defamation Act 2013 hailed it as a milestone for freedom of expression. In light of this, critically consider whether and to what extent the Act has the effect that is attributed to it.

As of October 2013, most High Court judges had thrown out two dozens of cases brought forward by wealthy people or foreigners about claims published mostly by the media. This has curbed the behaviour of people of exploiting England courts. Throwing out most of the cases, Judges have described claimants endeavours as an abuse of law or process, claiming that it they were harming the England and Wales reputation by making their country seem like they do not respect peoples’ freedom of expression. Allowing such case to move on endangers unequal and needless interference with freedom of expression. Judges today are stressing that claimants have to present considerable harm to their repute in England courts in order for the suits to succeed. Otherwise, it would be a waste of time to take your claim to court. This is a significant ruling because it now prevents people for making use of the law when the matter is not that ...
Download paper

Related Essays

Does the law of defamation strike a fair balance between the protection of reputation and freedom of expression?
The public naturally looks to the media to provide this information. The law of defamation has a greater impact than any other area of the law, on what and how this information is reported to the public.1 The law of defamation holds the publisher of information responsible for the accuracy of the information revealed. In the absence of the law of defamation, reputations would be harmed without remedies. However, the law of defamation must be framed so as to allow freedom of expression so that information released to the public has substance.2 It is therefore necessary that fair balance is…
23 pages (5773 words)
Critically examine the effect of the Charities Act 2006 on the definition of charitable aims.
The Statute of Elizabeth, referred by many to as The Statute of Charitable Uses 1601 was the first legal conception of the charities trust. The Act defined charity in its preamble as, land, profits, and goods set aside for the benefit of the society from soldiers to school going children and the poor and elderly1. The Charities Act 1960 revoked all the previous statutes on charities leaving the interpretation of the term charities to fall under the purview of the law of England and Wales. Effect of the Charities Act 2006 The designation of a charitable organization in the United Kingdom’s…
3 pages (753 words)
The Defamation Bill 2013 will eliminate all the problems of the law of Defamation. Discuss
6). However, does the Defamation Bill reflect these concerns? This essay seeks to critique the current Defamation Bill (As Amended on Report, ordered to be printed on 5 February 2013) particularly focusing on Clauses 4, 5 and 6 thereof. The said Clauses provide for some of the defences to an action for defamation. Clause 4 Clause 4 refers to the truthfulness of the imputation which if shown by the defendant to be substantially true, then it may be a defence in an action for imputation (Defamation Bill, Clause 4). Additionally, where there are two or more distinct imputations, the defence of…
6 pages (1506 words)
UK defamation law : does it place an unwarranted restriction on our right to freedom of expression?
It acts as a managing force between two opposing individuals or interests (BAKER, 2011, p.1). In the contemporary world freedom of expression is considered and acknowledged as a basic human right and therefore it must not be restricted through any means. However, in UK the defamation law restricts and hinders it by asking a proof for defamatory material. For instance, publishers and electronic media personnel have a right of freedom of expression which allows them to discuss anyone as per the public interest while on the other hand if the printed or broadcasted material brings reputational…
8 pages (2008 words)
Improvements to the Law as Introduced by the Defamation Act 2013
In line with this, the new Act aims to protect not only the right of each person to express themselves verbally or in writing but also the need to protect the reputation of each person. To serve this purpose, Defamation Act 2013 was enacted on the 25th of April 20132. On top of setting grounds on freedom to express one’s own thoughts and ideas and the need to protect the reputation of another person or a business entity, the said Act also applies to the need to control libel tourism. As such, the Act extends legal protection to website operators by entitling them for a defence in case the…
10 pages (2510 words)
Freedom of Information Act 2000
A campaign that finally resulted in the birth of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 on January 1, 2005. Notwithstanding these significant success chucked, a few years down the line the Act has generated mixed feelings and also generated unprecedented controversies. It is against this background that the central focus of this essay will be to conduct an exhaustive analysis of the most contending issues in the Freedom of Information Act 2000.…
6 pages (1506 words)