Law Essays

I support the motion on the judicial process, being an essential element in the effort to curb the problem of diversity in the arm of the judiciary. We should all understand that having an efficient judicial system can be termed as a cornerstone of any civilized nation. England is thus, fortunate to be an embodiment of integrity, excellence and independence.

This report contains the findings of a study done to determine the age, gender and crime distribution in various correctional facilities in the USA. It also includes the satisfaction scores for key components of the criminal justice system and services. The research participants were 25 prisoners serving various jail terms in both the state and federal prisons.

In the context of the law, it is essential to differentiate between the objects, the aims, and the means of a charity. A charitable trust’s objects, according to the Charity Commission of the United Kingdom, are the terms used to identify the purposes for which the institution wishes to serve the community.

The sources include Presidential Proclamation 7463, Congressional “Authorization for Use of Military Force”, and President Military Order of November 13, 2001, “Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War against Terrorism”. The Presidential Proclamation and Congressional directive were passed on the same day and the Presented is given the power to utilize appropriate force against criminal or civil-related threats.

However, some degree of interference is actually not harmful but beneficial. Perhaps, freedom should be such that it does not interfere with the freedom of others. But it is easier to put that in general terms than apply it in practice. It is difficult to find a proper standard of interference that does not affect the freedom of others.

One of the aims of victimology is to understand the relationships among victims, offenders, and their circumstances, including determining why some people are more prone to victimization than others and what conditions increase victim susceptibility, so that researchers can recommend evidence-based crime reduction strategies and programs that center on both victims and their environments.

The company’s potential liabilities have increased because of the increased availability of the product in the market. In addition, with the requirement of additional employees, equipment, and more expected contracts, it is imperative that Acme re-position itself in order to protect the success of the young growing business.

Netherlands and Britain followed the financial structures, further refining them by creating bills of exchange, and within a couple of centuries, the moneylender lost relevance, since private funds, income, equity, and prosperity among businesspersons grew. The economic scene was ripe for the industrial revolution, and finally, the archaic usury laws were repealed.

The Act seeks to protect mentally-ill persons who are aged 16 and above from arbitrary decisions. This way, the MCA covers vital decisions concerning an individuals assets, financial and medical issues as well as social

The law requires that the relevant duty of care is under the law of negligence. However, its application is not affected by common law rules excluding liability in the law of negligence where people are connected in a criminal enterprise or where they agree to take a risk (Monaghan, 2014). In this context, the employer can be prosecuted if the worker died or he or she is an illegal immigrant.

Once a company is incorporated, it then becomes a separate lawful unit that is distinct from its shareholders, owners and directors. The company therefore possesses its own obligations, duties and rights that are separate from those of the owners and the shareholders. This separate legal entity of the company is referred to as the ‘veil of incorporation’ (Blackwell's, 2014).  

The Act also requires individuals, financial institutions and their subsidiaries to initially register with the National Mortgaging Licensing System and

However in 1857 Mexico opted for a republican system format which was under a federation of states. This is the same format that United States of America had adopted since the 18th Century. The Mexican court handles several cases including criminal,

Islamic accountability may be anticipated according to corporate governance from the Islamic perspective. The Muslims consider that their accountability is a requirement of the teachings of the religion and the will of Allah. The concepts of the principles are inclined that God shall hold each person accountable on the Day of Judgment.

Garland(2001) outlines several trends of the 20th century that have set the scene for led to changes in criminal policy. Firstly, the emergence of liberalism and the New Right led to the rejection of welfare capitalism. There was a great emphasis placed on adherence to moral principles and the need to crack down on and punish deviant elements.

Solicitors are the larger part of the population in the UK with 71,000 in number and barristers practicing at Bar with 7,000 in number. Both professions have their own governing bodies named General Council of Bar (Barrister) and Law Society (Solicitors) (Bowles, 1994). In the next section definitions of Barrister and Solicitor will be briefed with their line of work.

The following are the different aspects of learning property law: Equity law is the branch of the English law which has been developed many years ago because people in lawsuits would complain to the king about the very callous rules of the common law which were in the way of truly achieving justice.

This essay has highlighted the crisis in legitimacy facing the WTO as it tries 21st Century global trade. The three issues highlighted, the development deficit, the lack of coherence and coordination with other intergovernmental organisations, and the proliferation of PTAs, all bring into question the role of the WTO as the only regulator of trade-related economic governance.

An adhesion contract is a legally binding contract, presented by one party to the other in a standardized form which contains clauses written exclusively by one party, without them being properly negotiated with the other party. This is the result of unequal bargaining power and causes unfair consequences to the adhering party.

Generally speaking, victims are the complainant in a case court trial. They are the ones whose rights had violated by certain criminal acts courtesy of the defendants or by the suspect in a criminal case.  They are the ones who are seeking justice in a case or lawsuit by filing charges against the defendants.

Regardless of its form and ideology, every government around the world enforces the laws and maintains order through the judiciary. Whether a country has a democratic or authoritarian regime, a monarchy, a dictatorship, or a presidential or parliamentary form of government, they all have their respective versions of the judiciary.

Labour unrest, interference with production and general instability characterised the industrial relation systems.1 This was

It is important for the negotiation team to assure the overseas company that the acquisition will be a win-win situation for both parties. In the

Moreover, capitalism can be perceived as an unparalleled means for satisfying human needs, enhancing efficiency, generating wealth and employment. However, it has also hindered the process of harnessing the potentiality of a business in order to meet the challenges

Professor Herbert Packer (1968) narrowed down the aspects of dispensing criminal justice to two: due process and crime control models. Whereas, the Due Process Model upholds the rights of all parties and thus seems to be politically egalitarian. The second theory, crime control, advocates for the control of criminal behavior.

Even though they deal with very serious matters in family proceedings and torts they are subject to civil rules as opposed to criminal evidences. The proof must be related to relationship of the causation of harm by the defendant to the plaintiff. The court

Following the losses incurred by the JPMorgan Chase bank due to falsified reports by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), this essay assesses and evaluates different administrative agencies for instance the SEC and its actions, and American laws that

The article provides that every person is entitled to the right to liberty and security. Any person arrested as a suspect or having committed a crime is entitled to information on the reason for his arrest. Every person arrested and his or her freedom to liberty is deprived shall be allowed to launch his or her case in a court of law.

intervention programs, the criminal is not regarded as a criminal but as one who needs the intervention of the police and other professionals to help them in dealing with their issues. The state of the situation with police intervention programs indicate that not a lot of them

The theory that is best represented in these core strategies is the social conflict theory. The social conflict theory explains how a community is always in a state of conflict for one reason or another is it internal or external. In order to end the conflict, several mechanism and people must come together and enforce measures and mechanisms for social control. 

Herein, it is extremely interesting to note that the defender is claiming the evidence against him to be made limited as it was taken by unlawful search of his law. The evidence that has been gathered from the appointed company (Sparkles) and at the working company both shows that the thefts from the petty cash are intentional.

The policy can extend the liability of the defendant in given cases despite being restrictive of the defendant's responsibilities most of the time. The language that most of the judges use while dealing with the issues involving duty tends to mask the fact that the decision and conclusion whether or not, there is an existence of a duty in accordance with the law is based on policy issues, this is a fact that has now become acknowledged openly.

The aggregate sum of time distributed to the television of qualifying projects included in the station gets allotted to the TV of

tion agreement which require them not to perform any duty for a direct challenger for a given period of time after leaving a company (Garmaise, 2009). Moreover, they are required to protect and preserve former employer’s good will, trade secret and other relevant information.

The employer was found to be in breach of the duty to care to Ms. Dickins. The company was found at fault because it refused to send the employee even after the employee asked for a six-month sabbatical leave. It also failed to give the employee priority in referring her to its occupational health facility (Platt, 30 October 2009).

The court explained that universal jurisdiction, as an essential international justice tool is the ability of a court from any given state to try suspected criminal persons for crimes committed outside the state’s territory and are not linked to the state in terms of nationality of the suspect or the states national interests.

In this case, these customers are left with no option but to be taken advantage of by the predatory lenders and loan brokers. Unfortunately, a big number of the people who are have seen themselves on the bad end

From the case study, it is apparent that the terms of the agreement were uncertain because there was no specific date when the contract was supposed to commence. Since the Arundel PLC had agreed to the terms stipulated in the letter written by Andalasia it may appear that the letter was a counteroffer that had been accepted in signing by Andalasia

has been under pressure to reform the immigration sector to ensure that people coming to the US have the necessary technical abilities capable of propelling key sectors of the economy to growth (Kramer, 2014). Promoting growth within certain sectors of the American economy is a

The conviction happened due to hurried investigation leading to presentation of a false case (Thistlethwaite & Wooldredge, 2014). The prosecution also made a mistake by not presenting the evidence that had been collected showing Mr. Morton’s innocence in the case. They also

In the United States and many other places around the world, there are ethnic divisions where individuals are either classified as the minority or the majority group. Based on the fact that the minority is disadvantaged by their status and has fewer resources and opportunities, they tend to engage themselves in deviant behaviors and different types of crime.

The common law and the company 2006 act seem to be unclear on their application in relation to each other. According to the UPMS, the company 2006 act section 260 does not remove the common law with the statute. It was necessary to allow the subsidiaries to have legal provisions to protect them against parent companies that wrong them.

The author states that the process of placing the arrested person at the custody is what is known as detention. Such detention must be for 24 hours. There ought to be review of such detention after the elapse of 6 hours and then subsequently after each 9 hours elapse. Failure to conduct such reviews renders a previously lawful arrest to be unlawful.

The ability to understand the difference between civil and criminal law can help individuals to understand the possible outcome that can result from any legal proceeding. This way, it is possible for an individual to know whether to seek legal redress through the court or to adopt an out-of-court settlement, based on the likely outcome.

Regulations under section 82 of the companies act 2006 provide that if a company acts in a way that contravenes the laws and regulations without good excuse, the offense will be considered as having been committed by the company at large and by every officer of the company who was involved (Sheikh, 2013). 

Particularly, the laws that conflict with federal principles or constitutionally safeguard human rights as well as the independence of the judiciary until then when the text of the Constitution is amended in compliance with special procedures like two-thirds majorities in the parliament and assent by three-quarters of the states.

The Royal Prerogative is the embodiment of the customary powers, privileges, and immunities exercised by the executive (Crown/Monarch), recognized in common law jurisdictions. It originated in the medieval period when the King acted as the head of the kingdom and at the same time, like a feudal lord.  

In the sphere of equal pay for equal work, the scope of Article 141 is wide and also covers part-time employees - the ECJ has set out a test of objective justification for courts to apply, whereby a discriminatory policy in wages and benefits will be deemed to be a breach of Article 141 unless it may be objectively justified on the basis of a real need of the undertaking.

Generally speaking, it is quite significant to notice that the right of privacy of artists is mainly affected by the press in the name of the right of freedom of expression. Intellectual property law plays a vital role in protecting the sense of innovation in any sector (Robert P. Merges et al., 2006).

Offences fall into two primary categories such as summary offenses and indictable offenses. The categories of offenses which could fall into either category depending upon the procedures set out to decide whether the defendant is entitled to a trial or not fall under the category of either-way offenses.