StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Tuckmans Model in Leadership - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Tuckmans Model in Leadership" discusses that generally, by creating awareness in the group regarding the expectations placed upon members by the leaders, each person is made aware of his or her obligation and the importance of working as a group…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.2% of users find it useful
Tuckmans Model in Leadership
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Tuckmans Model in Leadership"

? Groups and Teams al Affiliation The research study is on the communication and group dynamics and was carried outin the GMU course management fall semester in 1996. The study was driven by the motive of improving the structure and direction given to teams. For the purpose of research, four teams were created and after the completion of the assignment, analysis of the work done was carried out, and two teams that were regarded as the worst performing were selected. Each member of the two selected teams was interviewed, so as to get the details of what could have let their team down. Several reasons were collected and comparison made. The major reasons that had affected the performance of the groups were: leadership, communication, perspective towards one another, and commitment. According to Tuckman, the issue of leadership can be resolved according to his model, which describes leadership in four stages namely; formation, forming, storming, norming, and adjourning. The latter being the end of the task. Leadership is the determinant of group success, and with Tuckman’s model, the team issues can be resolved. Keywords: Teams, Members, Communication, Leadership, Tuckman’s Model QUESTION ONE Factors that Caused Poor Functioning of Team A Lack of consistency in terms of attendance by 3 group members during the initial stages of project development, there was a lot of absenteeism. Lack of defined leadership; there was no right procedure for the appointment of leaders, in fact, there is the case where the caretaker and the organizer were appointed in the absence of some members. Poor communication approach: Due to various commitments of the members, it was difficult for them to meet; this was further affected by the methods of communication preferred by members. Some preferred face to face, while others preferred the use of discussion tools. Furthermore, these two methods had other challenges. For the case of face to face, there were conflicts on the meeting points, and at times failure by members to attend. For the case of discussion tools, some members did not have time to read what had been posted. These communication problems greatly affected the progress of the project. According to the statistics collected in the socio-gram, results showed that members could not work well with one another, since there were differences amongst them. Coping up with such an issue in a group is very difficult and usually leads to failure. Lenience of the members in dealing with defaulting members became a routine, and this resulted to overworking on the part of the other members, hence creation of imbalance of workloads. Lack of commitment: some members had taken lightly the task that was before them and therefore could not give it priority; ideas could not be well tapped and often, there was over reliance on a few individuals. Factors that led to Poor Functioning of Group B Late commencement of the project: the members dragged themselves too much, and this reduced their time to work, while they still had to beat the deadline. Poor communication: members rarely met and used discussion tools inadequately. Lack of commitment: this is seen through the two dropouts who earlier on showed some signs of commitment and later retreated. Internal conflicts: although some members denied this, it was still evident that misunderstandings prevailed; some were angry and stressed while doing the work, but could not communicate it out. Norms were not set to enable each member to have a guideline to follow. QUESTION TWO Comparison of Conflicts in Group A and Group B Tickman’s stage two of group formation is regarded as the storming stage and is seen as the conflict stage. In terms of decision making, there are similarities between the two groups (group A and B). At one point, members agree on certain approaches, but fail to honor the decision. For the two groups, in most occasions, each member decides what to do, regardless of the impact on the project. The position of leadership differed in the two groups; for group A, members were not sure of who the leader was, to some extent that there seemed to be many leaders in the group. There was no defined procedure that had been set in the selection of the leader. In group B, there was one leader who was self appointed, it was against the members wishes, but they later accepted him. The similarity between these two groups is that in both, there was no defined method of choosing leaders. For the two groups, there were several uncertainties as a result of members’ attitudes and commitments. One could not easily predict the success of the project; in case A, only four members were left to do the project, lack of commitment and laxity doomed the whole project. For the case of group B, given the slow start of the project, one could easily predict its failure. Members too were not committed. Group work for the two groups was marred with stress and disappointments. From the socio-gram drawn for each group, there is evidence of lack of proper cooperation between members, as disclosed by some members; non performing members ought to have been condemned. This shows that cooperation was so low; some members were not of the idea of working with other members of the group. Group A members had sidelined the non-active individuals and developed negative attitudes towards them. They even dropped them from the group. The non active members too disagreed with the group, arguing that their ideas were better and should have been adopted. This was not possible given the deadline that was to be met and the type of participation of these individuals. In contrast, group B members were more united and did not expose the difference that existed amongst them. Furthermore, they were satisfied with the end of the project. None created criticism as in the case of group A. QUESTION THREE Ways to Resolve Conflicts Group A The main cause of ineffectiveness in group A resulted from poor leadership; there was no appropriate leadership structure. For a group to function properly there has to be a leader to make intelligent decisions and involve the whole group to resolve any conflict. With the right leadership, there will be an ideal development and growth in team work. As argued by Tuckman in his group formation model, the success of a group highly depends on a leader to provide guidance and show way to the group. Communication was one of the problems in group A; communication can be effected by providing group members with communication skills. Each member will learn how to approach the other. According to Lambert and Selma (1999), good communication skills help in conflict resolution and prevent them from arising. Another major issue in group A was the sharing of roles and responsibilities. Some members neglected their duties, and ended up overloading others. To resolve this issue, the leader should form a committee within the group to breakdown the tasks and delegate to members, group agreement is more acceptable than individual decision. Group B The main issue was the setting up of norms; there was no clear guideline to govern the members. Norm setting is very important in any group. A well set norm increases the chances of commitment, hard work, and appreciation of team work. With the existence of conflicts within group B, members should be taught to recognize the means of conflict resolution taken by others. This will enable them to be aware of existence of ideological differences and be able to appreciate one another at any given moment. In this regard, there will be better understanding and the group will be steered forward. By creating awareness in the group regarding the expectations placed upon members by the leaders, each person is made aware of his or her obligation and the importance of working as a group. Work has to be delegated to each one of them to ensure equitable sharing of roles and responsibilities. With this perspective, greater achievement will be achieved. Reference List Borkman, T. (1996). Case Studies of Two Poorly Functioning Teams. Retrieved July 6, 2013, from http://virtualschool.edu/98c/Soci305/Soci305Thomasina.html Lambert, J. & Selma, M. (1999). 50 Activities for Conflict Resolution. Canada: HRD Press. Tuckman, B. (1965). Forming Storming Norming Performing Model. Retrieved July 6, 2013, from http://www.businessballs.com/tuckmanformingstormingnormingperforming.htm Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Groups and Teams Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
Groups and Teams Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/management/1482066-groups-and-teams
(Groups and Teams Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
Groups and Teams Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/management/1482066-groups-and-teams.
“Groups and Teams Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/management/1482066-groups-and-teams.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Tuckmans Model in Leadership

How to succeed at team-building

How to Succeed at Team-building (Student ID) (Course work) Table of Content Introduction 2 Literature review 2 Tuckman's model 2 Action centred leadership model 4 Conclusion 6 References 7 How to Succeed at Team-building Introduction Organisational behaviour is a broad area of study that addresses the impact of individuals and people working together in teams on the behaviour of an organisation.... A strong and efficient leadership is necessary to improve the team dynamics....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

Effective Management for the Success of the Team

Tuckman theory of team formation and development is the most acknowledged model of team development and occurs in four stages which are forming, storming, norming and performing (Johnson 2010, P.... Tuckman's model of team development Tuckman's group development model pays...
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Tuckman Stages of Group Development

(2000) Creative leadership processes in project team development: An alternative to Tuckman's stage model, British Journal of Management, Part 4, pp273-283Rickards, T.... Bruce proposed that there are five stages of group development and he also proposed that all the stages were important for a team to advance, progress, face and cope up with the challenges, to… Other models have been based on this model.... orming is the Tuckman's Stages of Group Development Introduction The group development model was first initiated by Bruce Tuckmanin the year 1965....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Team working theories

During the formation stage, the team is entirely dependent on the leadership of one person.... In this essay, the writer starts by providing brief descriptions of four team working theories namely Belbin's model, Tuckman's model, Adair's model, and Maslow's model.... nbsp;  According to Tuckman's model, there are five stages involved in building an effective team.... ccording to John Adair's action-centered model, there are three parts that contribute to effective team building....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

My Educational Career

The best explanation of the way we adopted the model, interacted with each other and settles on what would be done by who is the Tuckman's stages of group development (Chapman, 2009) shown below; ... This consultancy project offered me a chance to discover how much I had studied and facilitated application of my knowledge on real-life… My group comprised of 3 individuals; all from various nations having mixed cultural backgrounds, experiences and knowledge to give....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Bruce Tuckman's Theory of Group Development

This paper "Bruce Tuckman's Theory of Group Development" focuses on the fact that B.... Tuckman introduced group theory in 1965, stating that every group goes through four processes – forming, in which the group is oriented and formed; storming, in which intragroup conflict emerges.... nbsp;… There are theories as to how best to accomplish the performing element....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Tuckman and Belbins Theories of Team Dynamics

Tuckman's theory of team dynamics posits that the leadership style needed for a team also changes as the team develops.... During its early stage, the team needs a directional style of leadership then progressing to coaching.... It will then move to a participative kind of leadership and ultimately ending it with delegation when a team or project can already stand on its own.... During this time, the team may have already produced another leader who would be fit to assume leadership and the previous leadership can now move to develop another team (Yau and Han 2010)....
9 Pages (2250 words) Case Study

Tuckmans Group Development Model

The essay "Tuckman's Group Development model" examines the team situation within the framework of Tuckman's group development model and also suggests ways to overcome the emergent problems, while underlining certain inherent advantages of virtual teams.... Let's apply and discuss the given situation stage-wise, within the framework of Tuckman's (1965) model: ... The fifth stage of Group development added to the model later, called 'Adjourning' explains how team members respond to a breakup of the team after the team goal has been successfully achieved (Tuckman & Jensen, 1977)....
3 Pages (750 words) Case Study
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us