Ethics from the dark side - Assignment Example

Ethics from the Dark Side Gowans, Christopher W. Moral Dilemmas. New York: Oxford Press, 1987. Print.The dark side is alive in the minds of advocates especially those with a share in the results of litigation. It takes into account those taking roles as Zealous advocates in cases. This is despite the fact that the roles of a zealous advocate and the expert witness remain different. A witness expert offers details within the case and aids other people in matters that are not common to all. It is always essential for an advocate to the attorney before putting their opinion in writing.

The opinion revolves accepting or rejecting the roles of a zealous advocate.Davis, Anne J, and Mila A. Aroskar. Ethical Dilemmas and Nursing Practice. Norwalk: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1983. Print. Communicating with the attorney helps him or her comprehend any weaknesses in the case considering that the attorney can end the engagement. In a similar way to athletes, an expert must stay within himself or herself as a reason for maintaining success. An expert has a responsibility of staying put in his or her expertise with the allowance of recommending the right professional for the attorney when called upon.

Kant, Immanuel. The Metaphysical Elements of Ethics. Raleigh, N.C: Alex Catalogue, 1990.The role of the professional (expert) is to apply his or her expertise to educate the jury as well as the judge as opposed to being an advocate. Enlightenment covers many areas with special emphasis in understanding issues not common to all. The compensation of the expert should remain outside contingent of the results of the case. The recommendation is having the same on the hourly basis. Other options are hourly basis and related techniques but never pegging the same on the outcome of the case.

Payments to the professional revolve around experience and time as opposed to a particular result. Expert compensation is a public concept and not a private matter. Its so because it is an element of the report prepared by the expert in litigation. The content is in some state courts and the federal court. This position contradicts the requirements of the rules of regulations that prohibit disclosure. Expert compensation remains a topic in a deposition. Dewey, John, and James H. Tufts. Ethics.

New York: H. Holt and Co, 2010. Print.An expert reviews after receiving information and documents of confidential nature. The professional has a responsibility of evaluating if the task ahead is likely to cause a conflict of interest before accepting an assignment. Among others, features to consider include present assignments and relationships. Benn, Piers. Ethics. London, UK: UCL Press, 2008.Print.Ethics are crucial in enhancing the duties of a professional. They can as well hinder his or her delivery of duties.

However, their greatest asset is strengthening the functions of an expert. A professional who analyses all the facts fairly and honestly without attempting to divert an opinion will most likely give a better opinion. Adhering to ethical practices increases the credibility of the wok of an expert in future engagements. Besides reflecting the favourable part of an expert, ethics work on the designation of the CPCU and the whole industry. Players in other disciplines such as philosophy also strive to behave ethically.

This takes place in a less-than-option manner. Mainly, it takes place without the conscience of the actor. Being a related discipline, most psychologists slip because of lacking sufficient knowledge in law as well as rules that govern actions within their profession. Others put personal interests above public ones.