History of Developing Joint Operations - Assignment Example

Joint Military Operations Affiliation Joint Military Operations Task The aspect of joint operations is a great milestone in the progress of security in the world. Essentially, it is a core step to ensuring that the security issues are heightened, and all the gaps that could act as a threat to the terrorists are cut off. In essence, the program has shown continuous development and improvement since time immemorial, to date and future. Measures are in place for ensuring that the ideal technological advances are adopted and utilized all along. The program does utilize critical pairs of in heightening military activities. These categories include combating, security angles, relief, engagement, and reconstruction of the failed security activities1. The core objective of the joint operations is to guide the dictate progressive development ad experimentation of security. All that is made possible through establishment of a common framework that does guide the military professionals in all the protocols regarding the future joint operations. The element of visualizing the future joint operations in a bid to monitor and evaluate the policies is also at stake with common interests of the policy makers and military forces. The team performing all these operations are motivated and guided by their success. The world was full of political instability during the moments of Joint Operations emergence. Countries are waging wars against each other for petty reasons. Many regions are experiencing immense political instability and delayed economic growth. The fall of the Soviet Union led to all these unstable events. Blame game was the order of the day, and this scenario did call for the formation of a joint military operations2. The operations did influence the security positively through reduction of transnational threats such as ethnic tensions, economic instability, health issues and crime reduction. The defense budget was also reduced considerably as the nations could work together hence a sharing the problems and budgetary allocations. Lafayette did send word that he found Lord Corn on the banks of the York in VA. Washington wanted to invade New York, but he decides to go south, and he joins with British forces, comes in through New York town and pushes north3. This battle was key, and the Prime minister of Britain resigned. Admirla de Grasses leave the West Indies and sail to Chesapeake Bay fights, take the bay and secures the mouth of the York. Lafayette sends some troops ground and assists in cutting off the British further up. It is a combined campaign but can be used to two or more services working together4. In 1863, the battle of Vicksburg did erupt, and the army, navy and marine took control of Mississippi River. The armies did utilize the concept of teamwork, laying a 45 days siege. Control is important to the North and South due to trade, transportation and logging. Grant attempted about seven times to defeat the confederate force at Vicksburg and never could. In one attempt, the sent navy, marines in, and they attempted to fire their guns but the banks were too steep5. It was not until Admiral Porters boats moved union troops south overnight that the city was attacked and surrounded. Pemberton finally surrenders after the people starved. Grant comes in from the south and Sherman from the North, and they surrounded them with the river to their west. The national Security Act of 1947 did come to restructure and overhaul the security system in the United States of America. The Act did create and establish many military institutions that did affect the military and security policies. The Act also did create a position of the Central Intelligence Agency, a body that was responsible for detecting and managing any insecurity issue and threats that were at stake6. In 1958, a massive reorganization led to a clear definition and unification of the command chain. The Gold water-Nichols Reorganization of 1986 led to the creation of a mandated Doctrine that did provide a common perspective to plan, operate, shape and check the military victories. There was a clear definition of the roles of the navy, Marine Corps, army and air force. However, there was a slight problem in determining the core service to utilize at certain times or environments. Such range of military operations includes crisis response, contingency operations, and terrorism sand arms control. The Joint Operations do work under the core values such as integrity, competence, physical courage, moral courage and teamwork7. All the Acts described above dictate clearly the various transformational processes the Joint Operations in the Military forces has undergone. In the future, it is even predicted that the trend of Joint Operations may take a different shift or change to better8. Task 2 Joint forces are on the establishment on three levels. The levels are dictated by the victim at the dispensation of selection of the team members responsible for the forced selection. Additionally, the also exists a difference in the roles played by both Joint task forces and other service related operations. Joint forces are on the establishment in three levels, which includes unified commands, subordinate unified commanders and joint task forces. Every group is under establishment by particular person. The president does establish the Unified Commands. The unified commands do establish the subordinate unified commands while the Defense Secretary, a combatant commander or subordinate unified commander, establishes the Joint task forces9. Task 3 Joint operation planning is an analytical and orderly process consisting of logical set steps to analyze a mission, examine and compare COA’s alternatives, coming up with the best COA and produce an order or a plan. Applying operational design and operational art are the conceptual basis for the provision of and structuring of operations and campaigns. Joint operation provides an approved process of organizing a commanders’ work, subordinate commanders, staff and others in establishing plans appropriate in addressing the problem at hand10. DESERT STORM operation virtually demonstrated every war principal joint doctrine element in action. In the initial stages of the crisis, when it had appeared that Saddam Hussein may attempt to confront Saudi Arabia, operational reach combined with speed were used to bring stability to the operation basses of the US. Throughout the employment and deployment stages, timing and flexibility were utilized with skill to allow multiple mass and leverage maneuvers. By combining deception and OPSEC under a unitary command, a force coalition maneuver to dislocate, shock and surprise Iraqi forces were executed by General Schwarzkopf. The general’s hint of a planned amphibian entry saw the Iraqi forces drawback from the coalition plan. The battered forces of Saddam could not react when Schwarzkopf lodged a swift attack with topped deception. Iraqi’s centers of gravity were smashed using mass coalition before the war on land began. Another example of joint operation campaign is the assault carried out on Iraq and the consecutive Baghdad attack in 2003, which was a joint operation. U.S Army ground forces fought incorporation with the U.S Marine while both the Army and the Marines were supported by the Air Force from both the U.S Navy and U.S Air force. The desert Operation was more successful as it was completely analytical and organized11. Task 4 Just Cause of the operation, Panama invasion, was an action that took the merit of organizational changes brought about by the legislation of Goldwater-Nicholas and lessons from the doctrine borrowed from URGENT FURY operation. The forcible entry led to a long reach of the operation and General Maxwell Thurman, who was the commander coordinated land, sea, and water action to realize explicitly outlined and rational goals. General Thurman executed and planned attacks on gravity centers12. Amidst these gravity centers was a Panamanian dictator. The dictator was made to flee when President Manuel Noriega was made an objective. This prevented him from executing his defense coordination, and a clear, recognizable criterion was established to put to an end the conflict13. Southern command operations of the United States carried the offensive in the entire Panamanian region, decreased their infectiveness, and shocked their forces. The US placed multiple bases in the territory of Panama that required defense and simultaneously attacked Manuel’s gravity centers, force economy ensured that the sufficient mass prevailed swiftly through an organized and coordinated maneuver. General Thurman depended on surprise, strengthened command unit, security and simplicity, which was made possible by the Goldwater-Nicholas act14. Bibliography Boot, Max. "The new American way of war." Foreign Affairs (2003): 41-58. Carolina, South, and Harper Weekly. 1994. “Joint Operations”: 92–105. Clark, General Wesley. Waging Modern War. New York: Public Affairs: 2001. Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986, 10 U.S.C. (1986) Gordon, Michael R. and Trainor, Bernard E. The General’s War: The Inside Story of Conflict inthe Gulf. New York: Little Brown Co., 1995. Huntington, Samuel P. The soldier and the state: The theory and politics of civil-military relations. Vol. 514. Harvard University Press, 1957. Mullen, Michael. "Strategic communication: Getting back to basics." Joint Forces Quarterly 55, no. 4 (2009): 2-4. Owens, William A. The emerging US system-of-systems. No. 63. National Defense Univ Washington Dc Inst For National Strategic Studies, 1996. Ploch, Lauren. Africa Command: US strategic interests and the role of the US military in Africa. DIANE Publishing, 2010. Rumsfeld, Donald H. "Transforming the military." Foreign Aff. 81 (2002): 20. Staff, Joint, and Coalition Warfighting. 2011. “Planner ’ S Handbook for Operational Design” (October). United States. Joint Military Operations Historical Collection. [Washington, D.C.?]: Joint Chiefs of Staff, 1997. Vego, Milan N. Joint Operational Warfare: Theory and Practice. Newport, RI: Naval War College, 2007. Vision, Cognitive. 2010. “Operational Design” (November). Read More