StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Search Warrant Exceptions - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
According to Section 3501 of the 18 USC, confessions, in criminal procedure may refer “to confessions of guilt of any criminal offense or any self-incriminating statement made or given orally or in writing.” Admissions, on the other hand, refer to any confession other than…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.3% of users find it useful
Search Warrant Exceptions
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Search Warrant Exceptions"

Running Head: Admissions and Confessions Search Warrant Exceptions By Admissions and Confessions According to Section 3501 of the 18 USC, confessions, in criminal procedure may refer “to confessions of guilt of any criminal offense or any self-incriminating statement made or given orally or in writing.” Admissions, on the other hand, refer to any confession other than that made by the accused in a criminal case. Admissions and confessions are statements which have the effect of giving adverse consequences to a person’s case.

According to the case of Bruton v US, 391 US 123, confessions can be the most damaging evidence against an individual. The US Supreme Court therefore, crafted several legal doctrines incorporated through several cases that guarantee that a person’s confession does not violate his rights enshrined in the Fifth (on self-incrimination) and Sixth Amendment (rights of the accused) of the Constitution (Brown 2001 p 151). To illustrate this, an instance of confession was culled from a leading US daily and discussed how it will likely impact on the concerned individual’s case, once it goes into trial.

In the July 18, 2009 issue of The Washington Post, a news article entitled “Friends Shocked as Man Charged in Wife’s Murder” appeared. It narrated an incident which happened aboard the Carnival Elation cruise ship while it was on its way to Los Angeles after a five-day cruise. A woman was found dead in one of the cabins’ bathroom strangled and with blunt injuries in the head and torso. The FBI which intercepted the cruise ship while at sea was able to draw out a confession from the woman’s husband admitting that it was him who killed his wife using his bare hands.

It turned out that the couple, who were married in 2003, was taking the luxurious five-day Mexican cruise to celebrate their 55th birthdays, only a few days apart from each other. The state in the event the case goes to court, should prove that the confession was valid and admissible in court to qualify its use against the husband. According to the book Criminal Investigation: Law and Practice, there are three tests to determine whether such confession is admissible in court: the due process or voluntariness test; the right to counsel test, and; the Fifth Amendment privilege against incrimination test.

During the trial, the state must prove that the confession obtained from the husband was given without any coercion whatsoever otherwise the defense has the right to object to its admission and move for its suppression. Coercion here refers to either physical (Brown v Mississippi, 297 US 278 [1936]), emotional or psychological (Spano v New York, 360 US 315 [1959]. The voluntariness of the confession is evaluated by the Court despite the administration of the Miranda Doctrine (Brown 2001 pp 151-152).

It is evident that the husband did not have the advice of the counsel at any stage during the FBI interrogation which took place while the cruise ship was in the middle of the sea. This could be explored by the defense counsel during the trial to move for the suppression of the confession unless this right was validly waived by him. The right to counsel of a person under interrogation has been upheld many times in cases like Escobedo v Illinois, 378 US 478 (1964), Massiah v US 377 US 201 (1964) and Minnick v Mississippi, 498 US 146 (1990) (Brown 2001 pp 152-154).

Finally, the interrogating officers (FBI) must prove that the husband was apprised of his Miranda rights under the Fifth Amendment privilege against incrimination test. This means that the FBI should have informed the husband before questioning that he has “the right to remain silent, that anything he says may be used against him in a court of law, that he has the right to have an attorney present before and during the questioning, that he has the right to a free attorney appointed if he cannot afford to hire one.

” If the husband waives these rights after the FBI has ascertained whether he has understood them, then the confession becomes admissible in court. ReferencesBrown, Michael (2001). Criminal Investigation: Law and Practice F. Ed 2, illus. Butterworth-Heinemann.Flaccus, Gillian (2009). Friends Shocked as LA Man Charged in Wifes Murder. Washinton Post. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/18/AR2009071800237.html

Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Search Warrant Exceptions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Search Warrant Exceptions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1556345-search-warrant-exceptions
(Search Warrant Exceptions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
Search Warrant Exceptions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1556345-search-warrant-exceptions.
“Search Warrant Exceptions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/miscellaneous/1556345-search-warrant-exceptions.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Search Warrant Exceptions

Situations in Which a Law-Enforcement Officer May Conduct a Search Without Obtaining a Warrant

In the following situations, a law enforcement officer does not require a search warrant to conduct a search:Situation One: A law enforcement officer when spot something in context with the plain view doctrine where he has a legal right to seize, does not require a search warrant to seize the object, evidence or contraband.... The plain view doctrine supports 'open fields doctrine' that states that any open pastures and areas related to it are eligible to be searched legally by an officer even without obtaining any search warrant....
12 Pages (3000 words) Essay

Exceptions to the Search Warrant Requirement

search warrant, in law, is a written order by an official of a court authorizing an officer to search in a specified place for specified objects and to seize them if found.... The objects sought may be stolen goods or physical evidences of the commission of crime like narcotics, etc. … A search warrant may be defined as an order, issued by a justice, under statutory powers, authorizing a named person, to enter a specified place, to search for and seize specified property, which will afford evidence of the actual or intended commission of a crime....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay

Conducting a Search without a Warrant

A search warrant is an order issued by a judge in a court of law authorizing the police to search a person or search for evidence required in connection with a crime committed.... However there are exceptions to… This research paper is directed to enquire into those situations and discuss exhaustively whether such exceptions are necessary since it would result in intrusion of one's privacy.... This implies that a search can not be conducted without a warrant....
11 Pages (2750 words) Essay

The Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court comprises of a chief justice and nine judges who are known as justices.... All these judges are presided over by the chief justice.... The US Supreme Court is located at… those who are not satisfied with the US circuit courts and US district courts can appeal to the US Supreme Court....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Constitutional Law: Activity Search Warrant Exceptions

It specifically, elaborates an investigation that was performed by the writer to determine factors surrounding their confessions.... These confessions are… There are various issues surrounding the confessions that were given by the five men, specifically: Danial Williams, Erick Wilson, Omar Ballard, Joe Dick and Derek Tice....
2 Pages (500 words) Assignment

Situations in Which a Search Without Obtaining a Warrant

The paper "Situations in Which a Search Without Obtaining a warrant" discusses that the Court decided that seizing and searching people walking around in public places did not require a warrant, but in most cases, the police could only do so if they had probable cause.... hellip; The Court balanced the property and privacy rights of the people against the legitimate needs of law enforcement and divided the world into three areas, those that could only be searched with a warrant, those that could be searched or seized with probable cause and those that could be searched without either probable cause or a warrant....
13 Pages (3250 words) Coursework

A Warrant of Arrest Issued by a Court

In this case, the arresting officers knocked on the door of a burglary suspect armed with a warrant of arrest but not a search warrant.... However, even this doctrine is subject to the following exceptions: one, when a felony is being committed; second, when a felony has just been committed and the arresting officer or person has knowledge to reasonably believe that a person has committed it; third, all breaches of peace like riots and assaults and batteries for the immediate restoration of order; fourth, in the disorderly conduct of persons violating ordinary police regulations like vagrancy and gambling in public thoroughfares (Tiedeman 102)....
13 Pages (3250 words) Case Study

The Exclusionary Rule and Two Exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule

The paper "The Exclusionary Rule and Two exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule" states that police are barred from presenting evidence, which they illegally seized, in proceedings against the accused if a timely motion is made to suppress or exclude the evidence.... Weeks engaged the appeal of a defendant who had been convicted according to the evidence that a federal agent had seized in the absence of a warrant or other justification for the Constitution.... The rule applies to evidence gathered from an unreasonable seizure or search in violation of the Fourth Amendment....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us