Strain Theory in Digital Crime - Essay Example

It is not always the condition that only socially and economically deprived people commit crimes for monetary success but others who are sound in terms of acquirement of wealth also commit crimes to gain further monetary accomplishment. They are involved in fraud, money laundering, cheating, stealing and trading private information, and so on. According to the theory, people are pressurized to commit crimes and an individual has his requirements and expected opportunities that are formed based on social structures and in case of unavailability of desired needs and opportunities, an individual is made to commit a crime (Siegel, 2011).

Like street crimes, white-collar crime can also be considered under strain theory. In addition, they can also regard the provided opportunities as inadequate due to which, they can be pressurized to commit crimes (Taylor, et al., 2005).

The strain theory is the most relevant in terms of being a cause of digital crime as the criminals can be socially deprived as well as blessed and can regard the provision of opportunities as lacking. Digital crime involves people from such countries that are poor globally such as African countries as well as wealthy countries such as the USA. Mostly, the criminals of digital crime have the ambition of getting richer by selling private and crucial information of one competitor to the other (Taylor, et al., 2005). People who are socially and economically stressed commit digital crimes. People can be strained when they fail to accomplish their goals due to which, they are involved in digital crime. They are involved in hacking, selling the personal information of their employers, leaking secrets, committing fraud, corporate espionage, and so on (Siegel, 2011).

Tunnell (2005) gives information about the criminal Dannie Martin who has a poor background and lacks any opportunity to get success and economic stability in life all he was required to do was meager jobs, which he rejected to do and became a property offender. Because of seeing his forefathers doing hard chores and getting no good returns, he was pressurized to make a choice that suited him and allowed him to gain money and success through criminal means (Tunnell, 2005).

Marcus Schrenker, quite a rich person and owner of many companies was involved in a fraud of millions of dollars. He faked his death to conceal himself from police authorities. The motive behind his crime was becoming more wealthy or incomplete goals. He was wealthy enough but still thirsty for more and considered himself lacking something. He was involved in unethical practices (Siegel, 2011). He was strained to get more monetary success due to which, he was involved in fraud. Read More