You must have Credits on your Balance to download this sample
Pages 3 (753 words)
Americans have always been proud of their country. "The land of the free and the home of the brave." The constitution of the United State of America organizes the way the country runs, and declares what rights are inalienable and must be protected. The right to bear arms (in a well regulated militia), the right to vote, the right to speak freely, even against the government.
Because freedom of speech carries such importance, it also carries the danger of being misused. People use speech to cause other people pain, and for their own personal gain. Media often takes their freedoms too far, impinging on the private lives of civilians. Despite these problems, speech must be protected. By look at the arguments made by Charles R. Lawrence in his essay "On Racist Speech" and by Susan Jacoby in "A First Amendment Junkie," the reader is clearly drawn to the conclusion that, while speech can be misused, all speech must continue to be protected, since any limitations could cause major implications for everyone.
Yet should freedom of speech be censored Charles R. Lawrence, in his essay, explains "when racist speech takes the form of face-to face insults, catcalls, or other assaultive speech aimed at the individual or a small group of persons, it falls directly with the "fighting words" exception to the First Amendment protection" (Lawrence 1). Yet even angry words, words meant to provoke, have value, and are speech. ...
Not exactly what you need?