Justice is the bedrock on which stands the framework of any growing and vibrant society. The primary purpose of justice in any rational society is to ensure moral propriety and honesty in all the spheres of life by raising a system of accountability that is just the right mix of ethics, philosophy, theology, integrity, fairness, rationality and natural law (Pojman, 2005)…
However, there is no denying the fact that justice also happens to be a highly subjective concept, which is often susceptible to diverse interpretations. What may seem just to a person or a group may sound unjust or partial to many other. In that context, it will be interesting to have a look into the concept of justice as per Confucius, Machiavelli and Lao-tzu, to facilitate a bit better understanding of the contemporary justice system.
The Confucian concept of justice is woven around the notion of 'gong', which if roughly translated means 'impartiality' (Cleary, 2000). Hence, Confucian dogmas strongly instruct the state and the justice system to resolve and solve the social conflicts and differences without resorting to any sort or form of discrimination or partiality. According to Confucius, the overall sense of direction and moral health of any society depends on the extent to which virtue and uprightness manage to permeate the social, commercial and personal spheres of life (Cleary, 2000). Therefore, the people only tend to develop a strong affinity with propriety if there prevails a sense of justice in any society. ...
Therefore, the people only tend to develop a strong affinity with propriety if there prevails a sense of justice in any society. It is understood that justice to Confucius meant absolute fairness and total absence of any sort of favoritism. Thus, in the given context, the fair and equitable distribution and allocation of national resources and opportunities of growth constitute an integral part of the Confucian concept of justice (Cleary, 2000). Confucius favored a concept of justice that distinctly favored the marginalized and weaker sections of the society and ensured their well being and safety.
Contrary to Confucius, the Machiavellian concept of justice is blatantly opportunistic. Machiavelli holds that the means are always subservient to the ends (Machiavelli, 1984). Thus, the direct premise of this line of reasoning is that the state or the political authority can resort to any line of action while dispensing justice, provide the delivered verdict or conclusion aid and abets the political authority in achieving its coveted and vested aims and objectives (Machiavelli, 1984). Therefore, according to the Machiavellian notion of justice, justice does not happen to be a means to disseminate a sense of fairness in the society, but a tool to further the interests of those in power. Justice merely dwindles to being a convenient tool rather then being an exalted institution and a reliable pillar of social stability. To Machiavelli, virtue and fairness meant any thing that furthered the narrow interests of the state (Machiavelli, 1984). In the Machiavellian concept of justice, preservation and protection of the realm takes preponderance over everything else.
Lao-Tzu's concept ...
Cite this document
(“Todays Justice System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/271435-todays-justice-system
(Todays Justice System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Todays Justice System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/271435-todays-justice-system.
From the research it is evident that the role of criminological theories and theoretical research on criminals and delinquents in the criminal justice system is not debatable. Conspicuously, theoretical researches have allowed for the development and the entrenchment of plausible explanations to realities of criminal cases in the criminal justice system.
Victim’s counselor should understand the weaknesses and the strengths of the media in order to help the victims understand the importance of using media in the criminal trial and they should even guide them while they interact with media about their case.
Other laws such as family and criminal laws are left to the discretion of the state courts (Harp, 1954). If the separation of federal and state courts had not existed, then each state would be free to interpret the constitutional laws, as they deemed correct. In that case, there might be as much as fifty interpretations of the same law.
These developments in international justice were mainly informed by the heinous crimes that were witnessed in different parts of the world including ethnic cleansing in the former Yugoslavia and genocide in Rwanda among other systematic human rights abuses and acts of torture.
shall adopt measures for dealing with such children without resorting to judicial proceeding, providing human rights and legal safeguards are fully respected. It shall ensure that children are dealt with in a manner appropriate to their well-being by providing for, among others, a variety of disposition measures such as care, guidance and supervision orders, counseling, probation, foster care, education and vocational training programs and other alternatives to institutional care.3
Until modern times, the justice system can be said to have been particularly cruel to the offenders by denying them their rights.
One of the greatest challenges facing the criminal justice system today is to strike appropriate balance between the rights of victims and those of offenders.
rse when these young criminals were sent to prison with adult and very hardened criminals, further victimizing them instead of offering some rehabilitation. Recent moves are more enlightened with young offenders given separate facilities and even offered a form of counselling
Considering the various definitions posted above, it is evident that crime is forbidden and attracts punishment as stipulated in the law. Some of the activities that are unacceptable throughout the world and therefore fall within the boundaries of crime are theft, rape, and murder.