High school
Essay
Miscellaneous
Pages 2 (502 words)
Download 0
The Miranda warning is police warning given to criminal suspects in custody and at times, before arrest, in the United States of America. This does not mean that police needs to give Miranda warnings for questions regarding a person's addresses, names or any other biographical information…

Introduction

If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you." ( "Miranda Warning")
Most people dreaded that government could act or treat according to their wishes, once any one was declared as criminal suspects. For this reason, there are certain rights, the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney that have been ensured by the Constitution. However, most people remain ignorant of such rights and a result, the police has for years taken advantage of the people's ignorance of this fact. This is what happened in the Ernesto Miranda in 1963 when he was accused of abducting and raping a young girl. He wasn't made cognizant of his rights and therefore confessed to his crime. In 1966, however, the Supreme Court disregarded his confessions as evidence against him as he wasn't aware of his rights to remain silent and his right to an attorney. Since then Miranda warnings has been given out to anyone who is suspected of a crime so that he later not argue of being unaware of his rights. (" The Miranda Warning")
Other than in cases of "custodial interrogation" as in Miranda case, the court has put down situations where Miranda warnings need to be given. In 1977 during Oregon vs. Mathiason case, the court put forward other situations where the people need to Mirandized. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

Requirements for Admissible Statements Analysis Case Study
Illinois', Danny Escobedo, a 22 year-old young man, was accused for the murder of his brother-in-law. The incident happened at the night of 19th January, 1960 when the victim was fatally shot. After few hours Escobedo was arrested without a warrant and taken to custody for interrogation. Escobedo made no statements to police and he was released in the afternoon when his lawyer pursued writ of…
Miranda vs. Arizona
Up until the time of the 1966 Miranda decision, police interrogations varied widely in manner and method. American law, based on English principles, had long accepted that coerced testimony or confessions were unreliable as evidence. This was the premise of the Fifth Amendment that made coerced and manipulated testimony inadmissible as trial evidence on constitutional grounds. Even though law…
"Sexy" Jhumpa Lahiri
These words will contain all the emotional significance of the story. They are what will make Miranda feel loved; and they are also the same words that will destroy all her illusions as the boy of a cheating father (Laxmi's cousin's son) pronounces them and explains his understanding of it. "It means loving someone you don't know".…
Miranda
If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you." ( "Miranda Warning")…
Miranda rights
On July 15, 2003, the California Supreme Court unanimously overturned a murder conviction "based on confessions gained by the deliberate violation of a suspected killer's Miranda rights." (Law 2003). Justice Marvin Baxter was very firm in his opinion that officers have an absolute obligation to "play by the rules when questioning suspects in custody and that their deliberate failure to do so will…
Individual Rights
One of those such rights would be the Miranda rights.…
The article Miranda Revisted: Dickerson v. United States by Thomas Petrowski
The author provides the factors under which the confession is considered to be voluntary. The section of passage 3501 is used to protect the rights of convicts, however, despite of this passage the law enforcement agencies followed the ruling in Miranda.…