Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!

Machiavelli and Hobbes Theories on Power - Essay Example

Only on StudentShare
Pages 5 (1255 words)


Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes are often presented as theorists of power in such a way as to suggest that there interests are wholly subsidized in the raw manipulation and execution of power. Their classic texts The Prince and Leviathan are seen as ideologically exclusive examples of how a sovereign can wield power with authoritarian supremacy at her will and whim…

Extract of sample
Machiavelli and Hobbes Theories on Power

While both offer ways to subdue insurgency and limit dissent, their works are deeply moral in nature. In fact so much so, that it is not possible to understand how they understand power without initially understanding what ethical conditions underlie the need to use power. Furthermore, power itself is a manifestation of moral and ethical desires. In order to make sense of this ethical substructure located in the work of Machiavelli and Hobbes, and analysis will be undertaken to explicate the conditions that they hold make the need and use of power necessary and beneficial for society. For Machiavelli the greatest moral good is that of a stable and virtuous state, and any action should be directed toward that end, while for Hobbes the need for the utilization of power derives from the inherent desire to elevate man out of the state of nature. It is only through an investigation to these underlying assumptions can an understanding of their related theories of power be compared and properly deployed in modern society.
Niccolo Machiavelli focuses on hereditary and newly acquired monarchies in The Prince, having devoted time to the nature of republics in another work (Machiavelli 34). ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related Essays

The Classical Theories of Power
Thus it is important to remember that their views can be only understood in the context of these experiences.…
6 pages (1506 words)
How do the views of Machiavelli, Hobbes and Grotius differ and what aspect of society influenced these theories
To his mind the law was a necessary and rational perversion of nature, part of the civil contract that governed all societies - a compromise in order for men to live peacefully. Grotius, on the other hand, would not accept the separation of nature and the law - the true law arose out of human nature and, more pertinently to him, the nature of God. As such, the law is not merely a series of arbitrary rules with which those in a social group (say, the state) are forced to comply. It is a base for all interaction, including interaction between states. As such Grotius points to a law than can be…
12 pages (3012 words)
Theories of Power Transfer
Survival is the driving force, thus, states must develop their offensive capabilities to increase their power. As a reflection of this selfishness, and to ensure their own survival, states seek to develop their offensive capabilities, or their military power, so that they can take over the territories of other states to increase their relative power. This means that their power is relative, that is, in relation to the other states (Fozouni, 2008).…
6 pages (1506 words)
Political theory
Aristotle said there was a truth in each that had to be reconciled and it is. The 16th and 17th centuries saw the emergence of two political thoughts that proposed singular views on government and the structure of society. Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes put forward their views and solutions on each and each directly influenced political ideology immensely. Each of them lived in a time and place of political turmoil, Machiavelli lived in Florence at a time of continuous political turmoil and Hobbes lived in England during its civil war. Aristotle, Hobbes and Machiavelli each designated…
10 pages (2510 words)