While both offer ways to subdue insurgency and limit dissent, their works are deeply moral in nature. In fact so much so, that it is not possible to understand how they understand power without initially understanding what ethical conditions underlie the need to use power. Furthermore, power itself is a manifestation of moral and ethical desires. In order to make sense of this ethical substructure located in the work of Machiavelli and Hobbes, and analysis will be undertaken to explicate the conditions that they hold make the need and use of power necessary and beneficial for society. For Machiavelli the greatest moral good is that of a stable and virtuous state, and any action should be directed toward that end, while for Hobbes the need for the utilization of power derives from the inherent desire to elevate man out of the state of nature. It is only through an investigation to these underlying assumptions can an understanding of their related theories of power be compared and properly deployed in modern society.
Niccolo Machiavelli focuses on hereditary and newly acquired monarchies in The Prince, having devoted time to the nature of republics in another work (Machiavelli 34). One of the most important characteristics that a new prince can have, and by prince Machiavelli is referring to any leader of a nation or state much in the same way Hobbes uses sovereign, is that he acts virtuously. "When these [actions] are recognized as virtuous, he wins over more men and they are more bound to him than if he were of the ancient blood" (Machiavelli 118). It is essential that men be bound to their prince because this manifests itself in stability and loyalty to him. When such men are dissatisfied with their leader they are more likely to foment rebellion and such a rebellion is more likely to be successful as their cause will be seen as just. Machiavelli is very much concerned with how a prince is regarded among his subjects. He spends much of the work discussing the respective advantages and disadvantages of being loved versus being hated or being feared versus being liked or being generous versus being parsimonious. The sort of individual who recognizes these advantages and is able to manage them well is a person of high valor and ability. Machiavelli cites a number of historical sources to reveal how these highly qualified individuals are best able to maintain a stable and peaceful state, despite the difficulties in establishing it. The difficulty arrives insofar that since men, "do not readily believe in new things until they have had a long experience of them," it requires a great of tact and resolve to install stability where there was once corruption and or chaos, thus men are chosen by the moment for which to act and be counted (Machiavelli 50). Machiavelli of course recognizes the need for the military and physical subjugation of people in order to keep them pliant. He explicitly acknowledges the fact that the characters in history he mentions such as Moses or Theseus would not have been successful had they been unarmed, but it nevertheless remains that their ability to persuade and compromise occasionally allows them to maintain their position. The state is inseparable from its prince and vice-versa. The maintenance of their position while serving their purposes also serves the purposes of the state.
Cite this document
(“Machiavelli and Hobbes Theories on Power Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/279038-machiavelli-and-hobbes-theories-on-power
(Machiavelli and Hobbes Theories on Power Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words)
“Machiavelli and Hobbes Theories on Power Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/279038-machiavelli-and-hobbes-theories-on-power.
Cited: 0 times
Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes are often presented as theorists of power in such a way as to suggest that there interests are wholly subsidized in the raw manipulation and execution of power. Their classic texts The Prince and Leviathan are seen as ideologically exclusive examples of how a sovereign can wield power with authoritarian supremacy at her will and whim…
Fobbes is best known for his work in political philosophy and in the social sciences although he contributed to a diverse range of academic disciplines including physics of gases, geometry, history, ethics, general philosophy, theology and political science (Bunce & Meadowcroft 21).
The Prince was written as both a philosophy and “how-to” manual for Lorenzo di Medici, scion of the ruling Florentine family with which Macchiavelli is generally associated. Macchiavelli’s seminal work is concerned with the acquisition and maintenance of power, by whatever means are available and necessary.
For Machiavelli the law was a means to an end. The law was purely that which enabled the principality to be held together and the prince to hold on to power. Hobbes, in a different way, also saw the rule of law as a thing which was necessarily imposed from above.
In his time and concerning his immediate history, the great thinker Aristotle believed political thought was frustratingly struggling between two ideological entities and so he proposed a conjoined fetus, named polity. Its parents were democracy and oligarchy, and Aristotle was God giving birth to the new thought from the best parts of both and without the worst parts of either.
These theories are also very much helpful in providing possible solutions to problems ranging from simple misunderstandings between two people of dissimilar goals and interests to the more complex international
According to the author of the text, Hobbes' most famous work that has contributed extensively towards the western political philosophy is his book Leviathan, which was published in 1651. And the investigation has shown that there was a strong background as to why Hobbes decided to get this book published.
This research will begin with the statement that every successful company owes the major portion of its success to its effective logistics and supply chain management. These processes comprise of flow of information and goods from sourcing raw materials to distribution channel and finally to the end customer.
The notion of a conservative theory was first published around the mid 15th century in Britain when none other than Hobbes published his seminal book, the Leviathan (Gert, 2013:29). He was one of the first to affirm
Conversely, tax evasion involves escaping tax payment through illegal means. In this case, an individual misrepresents or conceals the actual state of his or her affairs to tax authorities such as the presentation of dishonest tax reports (James,
3 pages (750 words)Assignment
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you!Try us!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Machiavelli and Hobbes Theories on Power for FREE!