The Israeli Defense Force carried out a very daring anti-terrorism hostage-rescue operation on July 4, 9176 in Entebbe, Uganda. The mission was to rescue 105 Jewish people who were being held captive by terrorists who were demanding the release of 53 convicted terrorists who imprisoned in Europe and Israel (Jewish Virtual Library, 2003a)…
It was necessary to make arrangements for refueling of aircrafts in Kenya (Taillon, 2002). It also had to coordinate with the French government in order to be able to acquire information from one of the released hostages who was a French national. This would not be possible without the agreement of the French in spite of the former hostage also being of Jewish decent (Taillon, 2002). The Israeli government also had to coordinate with the United States military that provided satellite images of the area. During the operation the Israeli government also had to work with the Kenyan government in order to allow Israeli planes to land safely in Nairobi and to have planes that carried reserve fuel to be land at Mombasa (Taillon, 2002). Coordination with the British was also necessary in to ensure that the rescue plane landed at Entebbe just after British cargo planes. After the successful operation it was still necessary for coordination in order for the rescued hostages to land in Nairobi and to be treated their. The Kenyan government provided medical services and food for the released hostages (Taillon, 2002).
According to Shoran, the rescue mission proved that terrorism could be countered effectively and it was an endeavor worth cooperating for (BBC NEWS, 1976). The irately operation however had repercussions some of which were serious to those affected. One of the things that happened afterwards was, Iddi Amin, the then president of Uganda having suspected that Kenya colluded with Israel during the planning of the raid sort to hit back (BBC NEWS, 1976). The humiliated president ordered the massacre of hundreds of Kenyans who had been living in Uganda. Another quite obvious repercussion was the loss of lives of some of the Jewish people. First of all, some of the hostages died during the operation. Second, Netanyahu an army officer and other soldiers also lost their lives (Jewish Virtual Library, 2003a).
Another repercussion of the operation was the breaking down of diplomatic ties with Uganda who felt that by having the Israeli army, a foreign force land in their country without authorization; it was an undermining of the sovereignty of the nation of Uganda. The Ugandans even expressed their displeasure by taking the matter to the United Nations Security Council (BBC NEWS, 1976).
The operation also caused a reaction from Israeli enemies who vowed to attack Israel even with more zeal (BBC NEWS, 1976).
The standards for counter terrorism operations do not apply in the same manner for Israel as they do for other nations. This is because of Israelis geographical location which puts it in constant danger of terrorist attack. Israel is surrounded by hostile Arab neighbors who are a threat to the existence of Israel. The Middle East war also makes the standards different as the frequency of attack in Israel is very high (Jewish Virtual Library, 2003b). Another factor that contributes to the difference is the history of the Jewish people who have experienced conflict throughout with such events as the holocaust. As the Jewish people have many enemies who are also very close to them, they have to be proactive in counter terrorism and have to act on many threats. The Israeli nation can easily be reached by rockets ...
Cite this document
(“Combating Terrorism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/287791-combating-terrorism
(Combating Terrorism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Combating Terrorism Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/287791-combating-terrorism.
The purpose of the act was to give authorities greater ability to investigate terrorism by allowing authorities the ability to search emails, internet records, telephone conversation, and financial transaction among other powers. The Patriot Act has been effective at combating terrorism.
The clan warlords have controlled several armed militias that were a big threat to the government of Somalia and it got the attention of the UN Security Counsel. After the failure of the UNOSOM I, which aimed to provide humanitarian aid and to stop the hostility in the country, UN had established the UNOSOM II which included the UN peacekeeping force and the US Task Force.
Moreover, it expounds more on the challenges that are associated with these ways, over and above, examples of real life conflict solved without military engagement situation have been incorporated. Introduction Counter terrorism also referred to as combating terrorism is a practise that entails governments, militaries, and police departments carrying out ways that are strictly meant to curb terrorism.
Is force a useful security tool when combating terrorism?
It is a fact that the world powers have played their vital part at combating terrorism in one way or the other but they have been largely unsuccessful at creating a much needed difference - a difference which will eventually stabilize the whole world when it comes to facing the threats which terrorism poses on an out and out basis.
According to the report terrorism is never supported by any civilized society and they have no codes of conduct or follow any set of rules. There is similarity between violence inflicted on a larger community and violence inflicted by a tyrant within a family. Groups tend to adopt the personality of the leader, and are held together by the dedication of the group leader.
After the failure of the UNOSOM I, which aimed to provide humanitarian aid and to stop the hostility in the country, UN had established the UNOSOM II which included the UN peacekeeping force and the US Task Force. Even though the American and UN troops
The Urban Dictionary gives a populist meaning of the word by stating that it is when a person’s or a group of people’s fear is manipulated for gaining forceful agreements to certain objectives. Terrorism is not war whereby either a state or non-state actors carry out an organized conflict characterized by extreme violence and economic destructions.