StudentShare solutions
Triangle menu

Miranda rights - Essay Example

Not dowloaded yet

Extract of sample
Miranda rights

On July 15, 2003, the California Supreme Court unanimously overturned a murder conviction "based on confessions gained by the deliberate violation of a suspected killer's Miranda rights." (Law 2003). Justice Marvin Baxter was very firm in his opinion that officers have an absolute obligation to "play by the rules when questioning suspects in custody and that their deliberate failure to do so will be severely disciplined." (Law 2003).
Kenneth Ray Neal was convicted of second degree murder for the 1999 strangulation murder of his friend and housemate Donald Collins. Neal was subsequently sentenced to fifteen years to life in prison. Neal was an obviously uneducated eighteen year old, and Detective Mario Martin deliberately continued to question Neal even after he asked for a lawyer nine times. After spending a night in jail the eighteen year old sought Detective Martin out and confessed to the murder.
The California Supreme Court decided that Neal's decision to re-contact Martin was "involuntary" based specifically on the detective's deliberate violate of Neal's Miranda rights, his youth, inexperience and low intelligence. They further cited "promises and threats made by Martin and the fact that Neal was isolated and deprived of food and water while in jail." (Law 2003).
The California Supreme Court further stated that "the consequence of the officer's misconduct-the absolute inability to introduce the confessions at trial-is severe, but is intended to deter other officers from engaging in misconduct of this sort in the future." (Law 2003). The California Attorneys for Criminal Justice made a strong argument that officers around the country are being taught to ignore Miranda with the hope of getting evidence to impeach the accused.
Many times when an officer has just elicited a confession to a crime he has a sinking sensation when he realizes he inadvertently violated Miranda. If the crime was serious and the suspect's statement absolutely crucial to proving the case that sinking feeling will soon turn into panic. Many officers, when caught in this scenario will offer up the suspect's Miranda rights, and simply start over as though there had been no violation at all. (Miranda 2004). The suspect, having already confessed, rarely realizes the tactics until it is too late. In the case of Oregon v. Elstad a sheriff's deputy arrested eighteen year old Michael Elstad in his home on a burglary warrant, and without obtaining a Miranda waiver, the deputy asked Elstad if he knew the victim of the burglary. Elstad agreed that he did in fact know the victim. The deputy then stated that he believed Elstad to be a party to the break-ins and Elstad admitted "I was there."
Later, once Elstad was at the sheriff's office, he waived his Miranda rights and confessed. The issue became whether the subsequent confession should have been allowed as the first statement Elstad made regarding being at the scene of the burglary was elicited without proper Miranda warning. The court pointed out that "failure to warn-which it termed a "technical" violation-differs in significant respects from constitutional violations which have traditionally mandated a broad application of the ...Show more

Summary

My opinion regarding Miranda rights is that policemen and detectives should be well-trained enough to know beyond a shadow of a doubt that any confession elicited without the accused being first advised of their Miranda rights is inadmissible. I believe that many times police officers attempt to cut corners and think it won't matter if they take a few liberties with the law…
Author : jonstamm
Miranda rights essay example
Read Text Preview
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the essay on your topic
"Miranda rights"
with a personal 20% discount.
Grab the best paper

Related Essays

MIRANDA VS ARIZONA
MIRANDA V. ARIZONA Your Name Your University Your School of Engineering, Social Sciences, etc Number and Name of Course Instructor's Name Date of Paper Abstract This is a summary of Miranda V. Arizona, one of the most important US case which has been influential in shaping the US Constitution.
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Miranda vs. Arizona
We know we have the right to remain silent and have a right to an attorney. Yet, the Miranda decision was far more reaching than the few principles that are read from a card. It reaches back into history to establish a precedent and presents ongoing dilemmas as it faces new challenges for the courts and law enforcement.
5 pages (1250 words) Essay
Miranda
They are only to given, when any information regarding certain crime are need to be obtained. The Miranda warnings are as follows: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney.
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Individual Rights
Just one of the definitions of rights according to law.com is as follows, "plural of right, which is the collection of entitlements which a person may have and which are protected by the government and the courts or under an agreement (contract)," (Law.com, p.1).
3 pages (750 words) Essay
A landmark case: Miranda v. Arizona
The facts of the case were that the plaintiff, Ernest Miranda, was suspected of rape and robbery. These crimes had taken place ten days prior to his arrest. The police went to his home and asked him to accompany them to the police station for inquiry. Miranda was unsure, as to whether he could refuse to accompany them.
14 pages (3500 words) Essay
Roe v. Wade or Miranda v. Arizona
on, made without any assurance of protection or threats and “with complete familiarity of his legal privileges, including any declaration which he made might be employed against him. Later, Miranda’s admission was allowed into testimony at the trial, and he was sentenced
4 pages (1000 words) Essay
Miranda Rights
years many terrorist suspects have not been read these rights and it has come to the point that many people, lawmakers and officials believe that they should not be entitled to the rights that are drawn out in the Miranda warnings. As these terrorist suspects are innocent until
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Miranda Warnings
4. If you decide to answer questions now without an attorney present you will still have the right to stop answering at any time until you talk to an attorney. Do you understand? Knowing and understanding your rights as I have explained them to you, are you willing to
3 pages (750 words) Essay
Should terrorist have miranda rights based on the constitution
in the sense that they sustain the democratic fabric of the American society by striking a balance between police jurisdiction and the right of a suspect to protect oneself. However, terrorists simply cannot be extended the Miranda Rights because these are the people who aspire
2 pages (500 words) Essay
Policy Analysis
The rights are intended to prevent forced confessions under police pressure (Ruschmann, 2007). Where suspects are not read their Miranda rights, the
1 pages (250 words) Essay
Get a custom paper written
by a pro under your requirements!
Win a special DISCOUNT!
Put in your e-mail and click the button with your lucky finger
Your email
YOUR PRIZE:
Apply my DISCOUNT
Comments (0)
Rate this paper:
Thank you! Your comment has been sent and will be posted after moderation