Minnisota V Riff - Case Study Example

Only on StudentShare

Extract of sample
Minnisota V Riff

The defendant then left the store at about 12.20 a.m. He discarded the hammer in the side alley between Marquette's Market and Art Own's Hardware. There are witnesses to prove that he ran home and also when he discarded the money bag and dropped $2 of the money. He used the money to purchase a guitar. There was a Canadian $5 bill purported to have been stolen from Marquette's Market. The defendant was arrested the day after by Officer Schield at 3.30 p.m. on the ground that he broken into, entered, and burglarized Marquette's Market.
The Defense's case is that the defendant, Ronald Riff, won over $900.00 in a poker game between 8.30 p.m. and 12.00 a.m. of the night of the alleged burglary. There are witnesses to prove that Riff won a great deal of money, including the Canadian five dollar bill found in Riff's person. Riff borrowed a tan cloth money bag from Red's Pleasure Palace to put his winnings into. He took the hammer from Rusty Fender's to protect himself and his money. He never stopped by Marquette's Market, but he did toss away the hammer at the point as he ran home. Riff had no motive to steal from Marquette's Market as he had won enough to pay off his debts to Vibes and buy a new guitar.
The prosecution has proved that the defendant, Ronald Riff, is guilty of stealing $910 from Marquette's Market after breaking into the store. There is no doubt about Riff's involvement in the crime. ...
Download paper


The prosecution will prove that the defendant, Ronald Riff, left a gambling establishment known as Red's Pleasure Palace on Devotion Avenue in Midtown, Minnesota, just after 12.00 a.m., the time of the alleged burglary. The defendant stopped at Rusty Fender's Body Shop between 12.05 and 12.10 a.m…
Author : simeon10

Related Essays

Terry v Ohio
The detective observed John Terry and Richard Chilton standing on a street corner. They were seen walking back and forth alternately using the same route and stopping to stare at a store in the street. This was done five or six times by each individual leading to a walk up and down the street about twelve times. Each time this walk was over they would pause and talk to each other. During one of these trips in front of the store, a third man joined the two and spoke to them for a brief period before leaving. Identified as Katz, the detective felt this was a set-up for holding up the store,...
6 pages (1506 words) Case Study
Commonwealth v. Schnopps
The relationship deteriorated further, leading to Mrs. Schnopps leaving the matrimonial home with their children to stay with her mother. Mrs Schnopps decided to sue for divorce but on the plea and invitation of the defendant, she went back to the matrimonial home so they could talk about their differences. In the ensuing discussion, Schnopps cried and begged his wife not to leave him and also not to take the children away from him. She was adamant concerning her stance on divorce and reportedly said: "No, I am going to court, you are going to give me all the furniture, you are going to have...
2 pages (502 words) Essay
Malika Boukbout v. France
Malika Boukbout is a French citizen of Moroccan descent. She has been living in La Courneuve, a lower-middle class Parisian suburb largely populated by Moroccan and Algerian immigrants, with her mother, father, and four older brothers. She and her family members are practicing Muslims, and specifically observe the practices and customary laws of the Malikite School of Islamic religious theory, which is predominate throughout Northern Africa. From her first year of elementary education until February 2004, Mlle. Boukbout has attended co-educational schools in the French public education system...
9 pages (2259 words) Essay
Clark v. McDaniel
The trial court ruled in favor of the Appellees against the Appellant, but dismissed actions against the Defendant....
4 pages (1004 words) Other types
Roe v. Wade or Miranda v. Arizona
(Cross & Miller, 165)....
4 pages (1004 words) Essay
These buys ranged from one to seven ounces of crack cocaine, which was significant under existing Texas statute. After a Grand Jury indictment, Montgomery was tried and convicted of several of the charges levied against him and sentenced to 160 months imprisonment. The appeal that was lodged was based on the following five premises: Sufficiency of evidence, Jencks Act, Evidentiary Matters, the Batson Challenge, and prosecutorial misconduct....
1 pages (251 words) Essay
Got a tricky question? Receive an answer from students like you! Try us!