Minnisota V Riff

High school
Case Study
Miscellaneous
Pages 2 (502 words)
Download 0
The prosecution will prove that the defendant, Ronald Riff, left a gambling establishment known as Red's Pleasure Palace on Devotion Avenue in Midtown, Minnesota, just after 12.00 a.m., the time of the alleged burglary. The defendant stopped at Rusty Fender's Body Shop between 12.05 and 12.10 a.m…

Introduction

The defendant then left the store at about 12.20 a.m. He discarded the hammer in the side alley between Marquette's Market and Art Own's Hardware. There are witnesses to prove that he ran home and also when he discarded the money bag and dropped $2 of the money. He used the money to purchase a guitar. There was a Canadian $5 bill purported to have been stolen from Marquette's Market. The defendant was arrested the day after by Officer Schield at 3.30 p.m. on the ground that he broken into, entered, and burglarized Marquette's Market.
The Defense's case is that the defendant, Ronald Riff, won over $900.00 in a poker game between 8.30 p.m. and 12.00 a.m. of the night of the alleged burglary. There are witnesses to prove that Riff won a great deal of money, including the Canadian five dollar bill found in Riff's person. Riff borrowed a tan cloth money bag from Red's Pleasure Palace to put his winnings into. He took the hammer from Rusty Fender's to protect himself and his money. He never stopped by Marquette's Market, but he did toss away the hammer at the point as he ran home. Riff had no motive to steal from Marquette's Market as he had won enough to pay off his debts to Vibes and buy a new guitar.
The prosecution has proved that the defendant, Ronald Riff, is guilty of stealing $910 from Marquette's Market after breaking into the store. There is no doubt about Riff's involvement in the crime. ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

V For Vendetta
The purpose of man versus society is to show the power of overcoming unjust government situations. It raises awareness that any man can take a stand and make a difference. Also, V's willingness to risk his life for this chosen path shows the conviction of his beliefs and values.…
Lau v. Nichols
The situation was then addressed in Lau v. Nichols, which was instituted in 1974 as a remedy, but the decision did not specify a teaching method, and the approach could be "bilingual instruction, English as a second language (ESL) classes or some other approach" (Crawford, para. 1). This broad interpretation has caused a great deal of controversy over the years.…
Terry v Ohio
The detective observed John Terry and Richard Chilton standing on a street corner. They were seen walking back and forth alternately using the same route and stopping to stare at a store in the street. This was done five or six times by each individual leading to a walk up and down the street about twelve times. Each time this walk was over they would pause and talk to each other. During one of…
Commonwealth v. Schnopps
The relationship deteriorated further, leading to Mrs. Schnopps leaving the matrimonial home with their children to stay with her mother. Mrs Schnopps decided to sue for divorce but on the plea and invitation of the defendant, she went back to the matrimonial home so they could talk about their differences. In the ensuing discussion, Schnopps cried and begged his wife not to leave him and also not…
Malika Boukbout v. France
Malika Boukbout is a French citizen of Moroccan descent. She has been living in La Courneuve, a lower-middle class Parisian suburb largely populated by Moroccan and Algerian immigrants, with her mother, father, and four older brothers. She and her family members are practicing Muslims, and specifically observe the practices and customary laws of the Malikite School of Islamic religious theory,…
Minnisota V Riff
The defendant then left the store at about 12.20 a.m. He discarded the hammer in the side alley between Marquette's Market and Art Own's Hardware. There are witnesses to prove that he ran home and also when he discarded the money bag and dropped $2 of the money. He used the money to purchase a guitar. There was a Canadian $5 bill purported to have been stolen from Marquette's Market. The defendant…
Clark v. McDaniel
The trial court ruled in favor of the Appellees against the Appellant, but dismissed actions against the Defendant.…