The Hague Rules

College
Essay
Miscellaneous
Pages 5 (1255 words)
Download 0
During the first half of 19th century, carriers claimed that freedom of contract was right approach and robustly exercised that freedom. While the shippers responded that only freedom of contract they enjoyed was freedom either to ship terms of dictated by the sea carrier or the freedom not to ship at all…

Introduction

The Hague Rules radically changed the legal status of sea carriers under the bill of lading. Again in 1963 CMI adopted the text of a draft document which was intended to make limited amendments to the 1924 convention which was considered at 12th Session of the Brussels Diplomatic Conference on Maritime Law in 1967 and 1968. The Protocol was signed in this respect on 23 February 1968 at Visby on the Swedish Island and the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act 1971 was passed by the UK Government with effect to the protocol and re-enacted Hague Rules and Hague Visby Rules. (Martin Dockray and Katherine Reece Thomas, 2004)
The Hague Rules were adopted in 1924, The Hague/Visby Rules in 1968 and 1979 and the Hamburg Rules in 1978. Each international convention in turn attempted to broaden its application in order to avoid lacunae, to encompass all contracts of carriage as well as bills of lading, and to permit incorporation by reference.2 The accepted international standard of the rights and duties of a Carrier, Shipper and consignee of goods carried by sea is the Hague Rules Convention of 1924 which has been given the force of law by most maritime nations.(Richard Price and Andreas Haberbeck, 1986)3
The general principle regarding the application of The Hague Rul ...
Download paper
Not exactly what you need?

Related papers

International Trade Law
The Hague Visby Rules after defining key terms such as 'carrier" (Art.1a), proceeded to define 'contract of carriage' as contract for shipment of goods "covered by a bill of lading or any similar document of title" (Art.1b). It further defined 'carriage of goods' as that period commencing "from the time when the goods are loaded on to the time they are discharged from the ship" (Art.1e). It also…
Frustration and Deviation
A maritime locus is defined as being on navigable waters (Force 2004).…
As the international trade and contract law scholars Yeon-Koo Che and Tai-Yeong Chung
As noted by Todd, the sale of goods contract functions to articulate the conditions of a particular transaction and elucidate its particularities, from the description of the goods being sold to the place and time of delivery.2 In other words, the sale of goods contract details the conditions and circumstances which would govern a particular transaction. Given the supposedly comprehensive nature…
Hague Visby Rules
Consequently, exporters are bound by the rules. On the other hand, imports will only apply the Rules in the event that the goods came from countries governed by them. Exceptions will be made to parties that expressly agreed to the Rules in their bill of lading. This implies that when a carrier decides to ignore the use of a bill of lading, then he is not bound by the rules. Such a carrier has the…
The Hague Rules
The Hague Rules radically changed the legal status of sea carriers under the bill of lading. Again in 1963 CMI adopted the text of a draft document which was intended to make limited amendments to the 1924 convention which was considered at 12th Session of the Brussels Diplomatic Conference on Maritime Law in 1967 and 1968. The Protocol was signed in this respect on 23 February 1968 at Visby on…
"Is the liability of a carrier for the carriage of goods by sea any different under the Hague and HagueVisby Rules than it is at common law"
These exceptions were stated in the Acts of Lading, making carriers an almost untouchable lot. Later on their insistence led to a free-for-all in contract negotiation, and to carriers claiming and securing exception from almost all manner and form liability, even negligence. This led to the decision of the maritime stakeholders to have some form of control to prevent widespread abuse of claims…