d between 1986 and 1992 and recorded various information about waivers including their involvement in criminal court processing, sentencing, and recidivism of youth offenders.
Podkopacz and Feld make several errors while attempting to draw a relationship between their localized studies and the role of waivers in court systems throughout the country. The study takes particular effort in ensuring that the population sample drawn from Hennepin’s records is reflective of the waiver trends Minnesota as well the United States. While the study succeeds in showing that its offender population generally reflects trends throughout the United States, the authors do not show that the judges sampled in the study are representative of the judges throughout Minnesota and the United States. If the authors had attempted to craft a more detailed profile of the judges, who made the subjective decision to issue the wavers, and drew a comparison to judges throughout the country, it would follow the judges elsewhere would make similar subjective decisions.
The authors take a conservative stance on recidivism by choosing to allow actual adjudications or convictions to stand as indicators of recidivism rather than rearrests. The authors claim that recidivism rates of juveniles indicate that court systems are not achieving their goal. When in fact, consideration of the types of crimes committed by repeat offenders may show that these additional offenses are significantly less in magnitude than the original crimes. Thus, the legal system may be “working” towards deterring juvenile offenders from additional offenses but not enough.
Although the authors make a detailed and strong argument about the role waivers play within Hennepin’s court system, the paper fails to draw a strong gap between the focused group of waivers in Hennepin and waivers throughout Minnesota and the United States. The authors of this study can strengthen their article by providing increased portraits ...
Cite this document
(“Should juveniles be waivered to adult court Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/325272-should-juveniles-be-waivered-to-adult-court
(Should Juveniles Be Waivered to Adult Court Essay)
“Should Juveniles Be Waivered to Adult Court Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/325272-should-juveniles-be-waivered-to-adult-court.
YOUR NAME HERE COURSE TITLE HERE DATE HERE The Problem with Juveniles Dear Editor, In recent months, I and many outstanding members of our local community have witnessed very high volumes of juveniles with apparently very little to do to keep themselves occupied.
The paper also provides evidence based solutions on the preventive measures and ramifications of implementation of the proposed change. The Problem: In today’s modern society, a critical public health care problem is the alarming rise in the incidence of sexually transmitted infection in teenagers (Healthy children 2000).
The idea that children should be stopped from doing undesirable things started taking root around the years 1500 and 1600. The exact of definition of undesirable was, however, ambiguous during these medieval times and children openly indulged in activities like carrying arms and drinking alcohol.
(2005). This research was designed in order to further examine the significance of this shift to the best interests of society and to further examine the recent data demonstrating less leniency accorded to juveniles in adult criminal courts. The most recent empirical data, as noted by Steiner, suggests that juvenile waiver cases no longer tend to result in shorter sentences or reductions in time served; indeed, this recent research suggests that how a juvenile is disposed of in the adult criminal court depends quite heavily on the nature of the underlying crime.
We asked many questions directly from the child to know the actual reason of their act. This survey is our primary source where as different articles, books and reviews are also considered which is our secondary source. The end part of the article deals with the result, discussion and then the abstract of the article.
Over the past decade radical law reform concerning the transfer of juveniles to criminal court has led to the question being raised as to whether this restructuring has really been more effective in both preventing and controlling juvenile crime, or whether the fact of transferring adolescents to criminal court leads towards felony recidivism.
vious studies suggest that courts may treat youths with more compassion than adults (Hamparian et al., 1982; Bortner, 1986: Rudman et al., 1986; Champion, 1989, Fagan, 1991; McNulty, 1986, Clement, 1997). Thus, the assertion in "The Juvenile Penalty" that juveniles actually
The jurisdiction of the juvenile court system categorizes young offenders into three groups. These include the delinquents—those answerable to certain criminal acts usable if committed by adults, status offenders—those answerable to certain acts not usable if perpetrated by adults, etc.
Moreover, the juvenile offender should be advised to get an attorney during interrogation (Champion, 1997).
A hearing of a juvenile offender should be open. Nonetheless, a hearing may be private on motion of the court or a party except
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Should juveniles be waivered to adult court for FREE!