The ECJ has observed in its case law that the principles of safeguarding of legitimate expectations and legal certainty form “superior rules of law.” Under Articles 288 EC (ex-Article 215 EC and Article 230 EC (ex-Article 173 EC), the breach of these principles is permitted…
This research essay will also make a best effort to deliberate about the European Court usage of legitimate expectations to enforce a minimal standard of treatment for individuals without infringing the public interest aims in administration.
Legitimate expectations inflict a responsibility to perform fairly, to respect reasonable expectations raised by the demeanour of a public authority. Protectable interest may demand procedural fairness since the verdict or the decision may jeopardise the applicant’s interest irrespective of the previous demeanour of the public authority. The safeguard of legitimate expectations offers consistency and certainty in administration, which is divergent from the infliction of procedural fairness to a decision which may impact an individual’s concern or interest. 2
Legitimate expectation deals with the affiliation between the individual and the public administration. It tries to solve the fundamental conflict between the desire to safeguard the individual’s faith in expectations raised by administrative demeanour and the necessity for administrators to practice changing policy objectives. This doctrine connotes the anticipations raised as a result of administrative demeanour may have legal ramifications. Either the administration must honour those anticipations or offer compelling reasons why the public interest must take precedence. This doctrine, therefore, deals with magnitude to which an individual’s anticipations may be protected in the background of a change of policy, which tends to sabotage them. Further, it is the duty of the administrative court to decide the degree to which the individual’s anticipation can be adapted within the changing policy objectives.3
The safeguard given to legitimate expectations, a standard which is the key to EU administrative law is directly linked to the concept of the legal certainty. It concerns with a scenario that ...
Cite this document
(“Administrative Law in the European Union: Legitimate Expectations and Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/384861-administrative-law-in-the-european-union-legitimate-expectations-and-legal-certainty
(Administrative Law in the European Union: Legitimate Expectations and Essay)
“Administrative Law in the European Union: Legitimate Expectations and Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/miscellaneous/384861-administrative-law-in-the-european-union-legitimate-expectations-and-legal-certainty.
Moreover, it is an economic and political union of 27 European countries (Oxford Dictionary of English, 2008) and it operates though a fusion of “supranational” independent institutions and intergovernmental decisions negotiated among its members (Anneli, 2005, p.205).
As it is, the EU Member States and their administrative or judicial authorities are delegated with guaranteeing compliance with the Union law and approving infringements. This paper discusses the relevance of the general principles of EU Law, such as the principles of proportionality or non-discrimination, in the development of an effective system for the enforcement of EU Law before the domestic courts of its Member States.
For effective determination of direct effect, the EU article meets the following criteria key among which are clarity and unconditional. Additionally, the article must have a negative obligation, contain no reservation on the part of the member state and not depend on any national implementing measure.
The EU constantly underscores commitment to establishing a cosmopolitan European identity.1 Depending on the source, there are about 12-15 million Muslims living within the member states of the European Union and this number is anticipated to rise to 23 million by the year 2015.
The European Union brings together several countries within Europe thus developing a common market necessitated by the use of a single currency. As an economic body, the European Union unifies the European market thus permitting goods and services to flow freely by permitting investors from member states to invest in any country.
However, this discontentment of the voters towards a Constitution shall not wipe out the progressive efforts that the European Union made to promote equality between human beings throughout the years. In 1993, the twelve members agreed in Copenhagen2 on values that each state should respect: Democracy, State of Rights, Human Rights, and Market Economy.
The doctrine of direct effect enabled individuals to proceed against their own governments in national courts, but keeping in mind the doctrine of supremacy which referred to the notion that national judges had to resolve these conflicts with reference to EC law.
Edison Volta was naturally affected by the new law and Costa protested by not paying his electricity bill. In a court action relative to such non-payment, Costa asked the Guidice Conciliatore in Milan to apply Article 177 of