In the paper “Physician Assisted Suicide in the United States” the author analyzes debates on the legalization of physician-assisted suicide. Physician-assisted suicide is defined as physicians who provide “the knowledge and/or means” through which the patient commits suicide…
The question then can turn to the reason for the action, whether passive or aggressive, that will end in death. One must contemplate whether or not it is always considered suicide if an action will inevitably end in death. If this is true, as Durkheim points out, then a soldier who bravely enters into a situation that is likely to end in death, but will save others, would also be committing suicide. However, the nature of the outcome is also not a part of the definition or the result of an action. In order to define a death a suicide, then, it is important to consider the intent of the action that will come to the result in death. In considering the different frames of action and thought when suicide is approached, it then shifts to consider the differences that can be appreciated in the reasons that one might wish to end their life. According to Holmes and Holmes, suicide is defined by taking an action that ends one’s life. They do not embellish or extend the discussion in the way that Durkheim does, but they simply define the term as an active pursuit of the outcome of death. They further clarify the ambiguity of the term by saying “suicide is a behavior that differs from one person to another and from one time to another and has different motivations and anticipated gains” (2). Therefore, in defining suicide, one must understand that no clear definition applies, but that it is fluid and flexible depending on the variables involved in the event or events that lead to death. Every year, an approximate 30,000 people commit suicide within the United States. Suicide is the 11th most common cause of death, with homicide ranking at 14th. Suicide is the third leading...
According to Hendin and Foley, “the World Health Organization recommendation (is) that governments not consider the legalization of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia until they have demonstrated the full availability and practice of palliative care for all citizens” (2). This perspective of the argument does not completely deny the use of such assistance, but does suggest that because of inadequacies in the current system, the potential for abuse of assisted suicide does not allow for its use as a treatment. Doctor Jack Kevorkian became the symbol for the other side of the debate in which the idea of helping people to pass more quickly when faced with a long term illness with no hope found a leader and a face in which to center the debate. In 1990, his first assisted suicide was conducted in which an Alzheimer’s patient named Janet Adkins was helped by Dr. Kevorkian to die. His methods were centered on devices that he built that made it easy for patients to push a button and deliver a dose of medications that would end life. Therefore, when he was charged with murder tin the death of Adkins, Michigan, which had no laws against suicide at the time, had to release him as he did not, himself, deliver the medications that killed her (Nicol and Wylie 151). Dr. Kevorkian aided more than 130 people towards self directed deaths and became known as ‘Dr. Death’ because of his activism and participation in assisted suicide (Nicol and Wylie 24). Dr. Kevorkian often become an adversary to the opposing opinion on the topic. ...
Cite this document
(“Physician Assisted Suicide in the United States Research Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/nursing/39054-physician-assisted-suicide-in-the-united-states
(Physician Assisted Suicide in the United States Research Paper)
“Physician Assisted Suicide in the United States Research Paper”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/nursing/39054-physician-assisted-suicide-in-the-united-states.
This has been a great source of debate all over the world, especially in the legal, medical, and ethical fields where the practice has either received plenty of support or has been vilified as being unethical and at other times being inhuman. Others have come to take a neutral stand concerning the procedure, taking a wait and see approach to the issue because it is still one that is undergoing debate.
On the other hand, many others believe that human do not possess authority on his life. Critics of mercy killing believe that life is the most precious thing in this world and it is the contribution of God. They also believe that only the God has the right to make changes upon his creations and any activity performed against the will of God is unethical.
Those against this practice on the other hand state that it is unethical for physicians to help their patients commit suicide when they have taken the Hippocratic oath to protect and preserve the lives of their patients. Both sides of this debate have made some very pertinent arguments in support of their sides and it has been very difficult for many societies and people to come to an understanding concerning this matter.
Evidently through different statistics, assisted suicide has been recorded as the third leading cause of death for teens between the ages of fifteen and twenty four. In order to examine assisted suicide accordingly, it will be worth taking a look at different theories such as differential association and self-derogation.
However, it differs from euthanasia, which envisages the “palliative treatment” to alleviate the patient’s pain and suffering and to hasten the death by administering drugs by the physician (2229). Similarly, it also needs to be distinguished from “withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment” due to its infeasibility (2229).
However, regardless of what definition the process itself seeks to define, the reality of the fact is that a certain level of ethics, legalities, and contentious debate exists in surround such an option. As a function of analyzing these factors, the preceding analysis will seek to demonstrate to the reader how each of these determinants impact upon the way in which physician-assisted suicide is practiced and viewed within the current society.
Either of these terminologies apply mostly in medical scenarios in what is described as ‘ending suffering that is untreatable’ to give the suffering patients a ‘compassionate death’ (Marker 2013). According to Friedman (9), several circumstances may push one to consider and even beg for assisted suicide.
om the aberrant (as defined by the law) behavior of some members of that society (Davenport, 2008).Criminal law upholds public interests and criminal prosecutions are performed on behalf of public through a state actor.
Tort law refers to the body of law that creates, and
cted by physicians especially due to the fact that it is widely believed that God is the only giver and taker of life and therefore, no human being has the authority over another’s life. Terminal illnesses are those infections that have no known cure and which can cause a lot
While assisted suicide has similar characteristics to euthanasia and even physician-assisted suicide, what sets assisted suicide from the rest of these is that suicide is the result. The person wants to end their life.
4 Pages(1000 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Paper on topic Physician Assisted Suicide in the United States for FREE!