Name Date Course Section/# “Why Do Students Fail to Disclose Health Problems?”: An Analysis and Review The way that different shareholders within society view the importance of health and the need to disclose key information to medical professionals whose sole job it is to seek to care for the health concerns various groups may have is a primary determinant to the level of care that is given and received…
For purposes of this analysis, the following article, “Why do students fail to disclose health problems?” will be analyzed. As a means of doing this, the basic premises of the research will be reviewed, weighed, analyzed, and a level of inference drawn. Moreover, the author will seek to lay out the basic statements and findings and analyze them in such a way as to seek to agree or disagree with the findings that have been presented. To the piece’s credit, the title directly expresses to the reader the type of study which will therein be undertaken. Such a point may seem superficial; however, the fact of the matter is that a large number of studies will delve directly into the subject matter without taking the time to ensure that the potential reader has a firm explanation of the topic in a way that even a laymen would understand (Skinner 2011, p. 4). As such, the piece in question clearly and succinctly lays out the topic before moving on to describing the research which will be performed, measured, and interpreted. Likewise, the reader is introduced to the rational for performing such a study within the opening lines as well as within the abstract to the piece itself. This rational is based upon the fact that the given level of dishonesty is hurting the academic process itself and should sought to be understood as a means to better hone the process as well as determine to the extent that the dishonesty is currently taking place. In much the same way, the article begins by utilizing a well written abstract which details the way in which the measurements and the study will proceed (Ryan 2007, p. 740). This is of course done as a way to further provide the reader with a level of detail of specificity as well as clear aim with regards to the means whereby the study will be carried out, measured, and inferred upon (Marshal 2005, p. 56). Though this analysis of the piece will find fault with certain aspects of the study, the fact remains that with regards to the specificity of the abstract and/or the title, both have been done in a way that necessarily helps the reader/potential reader to understand the full scope of the work that is about to be engaged upon. In much the same way, the authors themselves are credible as they are professionals within the field and have provided a level of scholarship on other related topics in the past. This prior scholarship and publication helps to give the authors a degree of credibility when attempting to understand, analyze, and dissect the given piece in question. With respect to the methodology for the study that was presented within the case in question, it was both qualitative and quantitative. Due to the fact that respondents were tabulated and outcomes were drawn from this tabulation, the research took on a decidedly quantitative approach; however, at the same time, levels of expression were gleaned from the individual interviews which were also reported within the research. The combination of both forms of data helps to make the research more thoroughly grounded rather than simply exclusively reliant on one form or the other. With respect to the quantitative and qualitative data itself, the following brief paragraph will discuss the means by which ...
Cite this document
(“Research critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/nursing/82749-research-critique
(Research Critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
“Research Critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/nursing/82749-research-critique.
This paper shall critique the research, “Impact of a fall prevention programme in acute hospital settings in Singapore” by Koh, Hafizah, Lee, Loo, and Muthu (2009). It shall provide a critical evaluation of the research, identifying its strengths as well as its weaknesses.
In particular, the study is concerned with assessment mechanisms and critical indicators or ‘red flags’ that helps health practitioners to properly diagnose the injury properly, carry out early head injury management and offer right emergency and proper discharge.
Alarm hazard is a problem in concern in this research article. The technical default in cardiac monitor alarms is been studied in this article. The article investigates whether changing electrodes daily decrease the quantity of cardiac monitor technical alarms.
ized as it does not only clearly and concisely summarize the key points of the research paper: purpose, design, sample, key results, but more so, it is cohesively structured, that despite spme missing important terms, the thought remains comprehensible. Also, although the
Stattin, Wändell & Törnkvist (2012) in Nurses’ preparedness to care for women exposed to Intimate Partner Violence: a quantitative study in primary health care directly uses human participants in their study to collect data (Sundborg, Saleh-Stattin, Wändell & Törnkvist,
For example, some of the researchers interested in preeclampsia include Hernández-Díaz, Toh & Cnattingius and many others. In order to understand the disease and to determine whether some of these findings can be applied in the nursing practice, a critique of the
Underpinning the study is that use of opioids in patients with renal impairment has the potential of increasing the adverse effects. The implication is that opioids differ in the effects on renal impairment in terms of efficacy and tolerability. Also underpinning the study is that there are little knowledge and understanding on safe.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Research critique for FREE!