Therefore, the legal and professional obligations of confidentiality that are rooted in the given principle of autonomy often are not easily overridden. For this case, continued deliberation weighs increasingly on the side of favouring the duty to inform and warn Linet…
Linet came alone to the clinic, though had been married for 7 years and the last born was 3 years of age. At the clinic, she stated that her husband did not know of her pregnancy as they had agreed 3 years ago not to have other children due to their financial difficulties. Linet was determined to have another child despite her husband’s ignorance on the issue.
When it came to HIV testing recommended as part of routine prenatal care, Susan declined saying they had both been tested with her husband before entering their marriage 7 years ago. She claims that she her first three children had been home delivered, and it is because of her complication that resulted in her last pregnancy, pre-eclampsia, that she decided to start attending clinics. Several weeks later, the nurse practitioner receives another new patient, “Peter Wanyama.” The patient states that he is concerned about occurrence of thrush symptoms, which had originally been treated 4 months ago. Peter states that he is HIV positive and had discovered his status 2 years ago. He is a long distance truck driver and sometimes sleeps out. He states that he always has protected sex with his wife. He says that in the past 1 year, he had been visiting an infectious disease specialist who lived 150 miles from where he lives. He states that he had consulted his specialist about the recurrence of his symptom, of which he recommended Peter to seek immediate attention in the town which he lived. 2. Include one ethical principle and one law that could be violated and whether the violation would constitute a civil or criminal act based on facts in the law. The nurse on pulling the file of Linet Wanyama realized that Peter Wanyama was indeed her husband. The nurse practitioner became torn on this scenario as she had an ethical responsibility of informing Linet Wanyama of her need to have an HIV test due to a risk of transmission from her husband who was HIV positive (Lipe, 2008). Furthermore, Linet was living in a world where she believed her husband to be faithful to her when he went on long distance journeys (Lipe, 2008). In addition, informing Linet would help her make a decision on whether to have the child or not as the risk of mother to child transmission would be existing. Furthermore, such a disclosure would help in protecting the unborn child (White, 2008). Next, in informing Peter of his wife’s secret and coming open about his status to his wife, would at least help them make a decision as a family whether to continue with the pregnancy or not (Timby, 2009). The nurse got herself in such an ethical dilemma as in doing one right thing, would resulting in breaking some of the ethical rules which the medical practice stood by (White, 2010). If the nurse decided to inform the Linet about Peter’s HIV status, then he would have gone against the medical code of ethics of confidentiality. Nurse practitioners are often required to keep information about their patient’s secret (Martin, 2010). Going against one’s confidentiality usually leads to civil lawsuit (Janie, 2012). A nurse can be sued and even lose her job and certificate from the medical board in case of such a lawsuit. But in this scenario, in trying to keep quiet, would only result to more harm to the family (Daniels, 2009). If Linet is not informed for instance, she may not know her HIV status and hence not get enrolled in taking HAART; therefore increasing the chance of HIV related ...
Cite this document
(“Ethical Dilemma Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/nursing/93462-ethical-dilemma
(Ethical Dilemma Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Ethical Dilemma Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/nursing/93462-ethical-dilemma.
Logics and ethics are often influence the decision making process of promotions. However, which should be given more preference; logics or ethics, is a big question the top management should address while taking such decisions. Some of the candidates who are seeking promotions may have more experience while the others may have more abilities.
of the global gross domestic product. The other ? of the global economic activity is provided by the emerging economies. There are 156 emerging economies across the world. These emerging economies despite only generating 26% of the global gross domestic product are the home to 84% of the world’s population.
The case of Sherry presents one such ethical dilemma. Identifying the Ethical Dilemma The ethical dilemma here is very clearly that of using marijuana and selling drugs to make ends meet. It is understandable that Sherry finds herself in a very difficult situation.
She felt the behavior of the nurse in reaction to the patient's need was the nursing process. She believed that nursing was caring. Carol Gilligan believed that nursing has a different voice in ethics and that that voice is seldom heard. That voice is about caring and benevolence.
Yes, Terry’s scheme does affect balance sheet of Fairwell Furniture. Under the Current Assets head, the Bank Account Balance would have reduced and on the Liabilities side of the Balance Sheet, the Profit and Loss Account balance would have reduced. Both would have reduced by the amount accounted as paid to Larry Tyler.By capitalizing a revenue item of expenditure, Wilson Blowhard is misrepresenting the facts.
According to the NASW code of ethics (2008), the core mission of social workers is to facilitate the well-being of people and help them meet their most basic needs. Social workers all over the world have continued to have a special interest in trying to empower the vulnerable people across societies.
However, a broader definition of ethics has been developed. An ethical dilemma is a state which involves mental conflict resulting from confusion caused by having different moral standards (Kathleen & James, 2007). All these standards are
mind, after assessing the Elizabeth Smith dilemma, Elizabeth is drawing on these socially driven prejudgments regarding whether or not to maintain worker/client confidentiality as mandated by the CASW Code of Ethics.
From a personal perspective, social location does, but