The Death Penalty Should be Abolished – Article by Bob Herbert In this article, Bob Herbert makes an argument against the continued use of the death penalty on convicted criminals. He introduces the argument by stating one should hope to be as bright and clear minded at 90 like Justice John Paul Stevens, who denounced the same at the age of 90 after supporting it throughout his career…
The writer has clearly set out to convince the audience that the death penalty is wrong and immoral and any justification it may have is overwhelmed precincts on which he demonstrates its thrives. These include racism and the possible incompetence of judge’s prosecutors and juries. Herbert also appeal to the readers logic and commonsense by citing examples of previous supporters of the penalty such as Adam Litpack, who have recently come to change their minds on the same. His description of the death penalty, which is undoubtedly subjective, is aimed evidently at getting the readers emotional support on board. This is especially with the strong and condemnatory terms …“The death penalty in the United States has never been anything but an abomination — a grotesque, uncivilized, overwhelmingly racist affront to the very idea of justice”. In addition, Judge Stephen who posits that deciding the life and death of individuals is not a task that should be left to a system that has been found to have flaws. The basis of the initial argument is that the police and prosecutor are liable to withhold and tamper with evidence of innocence in order to ensure they get the verdict. He strengthens his argument by asserting that there have cases where lawyers on whom the defendants lives depend have been drunk or on drugs and as result, innocents have died. Herein he develops his case for banning the practice by opening the reader to the possibility that despite the otherwise viability the penalty, it can result to innocent people dying as one cannot be 100% sure of one’s guilty by making it appear relative to the defenders competence with is also relative to their sobriety, and other circumstances. The writer also uses retrospective evidence to persuade the reader of the authenticity of his claims in a demonstrative of the effects of racism in the wheel of justice. Moreover, he cites cases in the past when prosecutors racism was openly practiced, he gives the example of a judge who says he was once told if he ever put “a nigger in the jury, he would be fired”. The writer then tries to prove that this has not changed much by saying that the prosecutors have however only improved their language as such implying the same sentiments exists even today. Herbert gives credence to his argument by referring to an interview with Patricia Lemay a white juror who once served in a hearing resulting I an execution, during the jury deliberations which are supposed to be archetypical of objectivity and fairness, the jurors displayed nauseating levels of xenophobia and discrimination. This was brought out by the idea among some groups that white lives were more valuable than black ones. Citing credible sources in the form of retired justices Thurgood and Blackmun who he contrast the original intention with the result effectively juxtaposing them to depict the inappropriateness of the penalty. Marshall said that it was approved by the Supreme Court to be practiced in fairness and justice, however, the promise has turned into empty mockery Blackmun on the other hand rejected it saying he would not be part of a system fraught with arbitrariness, discrimination, caprice and mistake” ...
Cite this document
(“Rhetorical analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/other/11959-rhetorical-analysis
(Rhetorical Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words)
“Rhetorical Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/other/11959-rhetorical-analysis.
Rhetoric makes heuristics provisions for distinguishing, comprehending, and developing certain arguments related to specific settings (Young, Becker & Pike, 1970, 1). There are five main criterion of rhetoric for framing a persuasive speech to affect the audience, which are based on arrangement, memory, discovery, style, and apt delivery. In case of rhetorical literature, Corbett, had claimed that in such instances rhetorical analysis "is more interested in a literary work for what it does than for what it is" (Corbett, 1990, xxii).
As asserted, the documentary aimed to persuade the viewers through rhetorical arguments of speech, sound, and visuals that there is a need to be alarmed at the rate hydraulic fracturing for natural gas drastically and negatively affects the lives of people who are affected by the drilling; and hopefully move policymakers and legislators into amending provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act.
It is the hope of this student that the reader will be able to gain a more full and complete/nuanced understanding of the way through which each of these rhetorical strategies are used in the video in question although it is but a brief 45 seconds and overall length, the artists and directors who were responsible for the creation and production of this advertisement masterfully wove a brief tale that is inclusive of each of these three previously mentioned rhetorical strategies.
Rhetorical analysis is the art of examining the author's views and opinions through examination of the components used in persuading the audience by the author. Rhetoric is a word that is used to describe the art and skills of persuasion. The main areas examined during this analysis are, the purpose of the work, the intended audience and the appeals used to convince the audience.
The bumper sticker “I should not have to press 1 for English” succeeds in some ways and fails in others as a rhetorical device.
One of the ways that bumper sticker succeeds is its simplicity and clarity. There is no way to misinterpret the
This paper seeks to discuss rhetorical analysis on advertisement.
Advertisement is usually found in television and radios. They are usually used to communicate particular ideas or events. Advertisement use myriad techniques to
The middle-class consumer housewife as the most obvious target, using credible and influential advertising content and communications to gain market attention. This broad promotional campaign effectively utilized ethos, pathos and logos in a singular ad format that
The author uses a high level language to bring out the contrast among the rich in society and the poor. His purpose is to bring the issues to the mind of the readers and do something about it. Poverty and desperation controlled the Irish
A table of content was used to outline all the features of the report. According to the table of content, the report has an executive summary, introduction, results, conclusion, recommendations and appendix. The formal nature of the report was reinforced by the use
This paper aims to draw a visual-spatial rhetorical analysis on the immigration laws in the government of Arizona, a state viewed as one of the key points of illegal entry.
The current growing concern around national fear about illegal immigration has made the American
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Rhetorical analysis for FREE!