War is Kind vs. Dulce et Decorum Est - Essay Example

War is Kind vs. Dulce et Decorum Est Certain differences between the two poems enable the reader to explore through the keen emotions and thoughts in the aftermath of war as witnessed and experienced by the poets of 'War is Kind' and 'Dulce et Decorum Est'. Clearly, the subject of each composition points to the intensity of passion which treats war either as something acceptable and void of evil or as an object of contempt. In 'War is Kind', the author attempts to offer a solemn insight to the humility and overall good the war is given to possess.

The tone with its smooth texture enhances the poem's theme to attain to the goal of realizing that, despite the hostile occurrences and ends, war implicitly acts in kindness. No tough imagery is rendered, instead the seemingly mild and abstract simplicity of what was bound to take place or be fulfilled as in a prophecy especially on mentioning “These men were born to drill and die (Crane)” in two strophic occasions. On the other hand, 'Dulce et Decorum Est' contains elements and device which W.

Owen deemed necessary to put the audience in the shoe of reality that establishes how excruciating it is to confront the ill fates of combat. It sounds as if to be convinced more on the physical aspect, for the reader to dwell in the understanding of rudeness and inhumanity there exists in war that rests on a bitter hope on the glory that apparently was a lie. Unlike the choice of words and alliteration at “booming drums”, “blazing flags”, and “excellence in killing” that expressed favorable justification for War is Kind to discourage a maiden from weeping, the Dulce et Decorum Est sets a highly upsetting contrasts in similes as “coughing like hags”, “like a devil's sick of sin”, and “bitter as the cud of vile (Owen).

” The latter however maintained some degree of neutralizing sentiments of gloom with alternate end-rhyme schemes whereas this was irregularly achieved in the third and sixth lines of the second and fourth rhythmic strophes which Craned moderately stressed on ending with 'lie' to follow two lines after the ending with 'die.' While W. Owens develops the poem towards a regretful end with despicable claims, arguing that the fighting individual is doomed to drown in the battlefield, S. Crane disallows acknowledging of remorseful empathy by considering the good nature every soldier originated from, being in “the lover” who “threw wild hands toward the sky” and the “father” who “tumbled in the yellow trenches (Crane).

” It feels buoyant with hopes one may seek getting replenished under this condition of discerning that soldiers, whether on the enemy's side or the other, are human beings themselves capable of playing sensible roles other than waging futile wars. Works Cited Crane, S. “Do Not Weep, Maiden, for War is Kind.” 2011. http://www.americanpoems.com/poets/stephencrane/11778. 16 Feb 2011. Owen, W. “Dulce et Decorum Est.” 1997. http://www.poets.org/viewmedia.php/prmMID/19389. 17 Feb 2011.