Global Leadership: Israel-Palestinian Conflict - Essay Example

Steps of resolving the conflict were seen in 1971 when Egypt offered Israel a peace treaty in return for withdrawal from territories they believe belonged to them. Jordan also offered a similar peace treaty a year later. The Israelites had to choose between the expansion of their territories or having peace and security with Egypt. Israel chose expansion over security and this led to the 1973 war. The war was an indication to Israel that Egypt cannot be under estimated and was a force to reckon with. It was later that Israel had to agree on the peace treaty offered in 1971, but this time underestimated rights of Palestinians were recognized (Chomsky, 2010, p. 2). Obstacles of the Israel-Palestinian conflict Negative perception by the leaders in dealing with this conflict is indicated by the fact that leaders do not recognize the existence of the rival state.

The outgoing Prime Minister of Israel Shimon Peres had stated that the Palestinian State would never exist. To make the matters worse, the incoming Prime Minister, Netanyahu, went on to describe the intended Palestinian state as leftover fragments of chicken (Chomsky, 2010, p. 9). United States policy has been indicated as one of the obstacles hindering leftover the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Chomsky suggests that if the United States changes its policy, just as it did towards South Africa, then Israel will be compelled to join the rest of the world (Chomsky, 2010, p. 10). “The ping-pong syndrome” is one of the great obstacles that affect the Israel-Palestinian conflict.

According to Salinas and Rabia, the cycle of violence witnessed between Israel and Palestine is made up of periodic attacks from the Palestinians followed by retaliation bombardments from the Israelis. The initial trigger of this syndrome is not clearly known or cannot be easily identified. When this violence takes place, the negotiations that had commenced take a grant halt (Sad Rabia, 2009, p.11) Distrust between the Israelis and the Palestine. The feeling of doubt and suspicion between granted sides in the conflict has resulted in an escalation of the conflict.

AccordingSalinas and Rabia, distrust is an elusive factor. Distrust has been classified as a short-term problem that needs an immediate attention or response. Escalation of distrust has resulted in a lack of solutions for ending the conflicts between Israel and Palestine. This has been indicated by the fact that even when an agreement is reached by both sides each group does not trust the o to fulfill their end of the bargain. In addition to this, the mobilization of people in resolving the conflict is also rendered impossible because of distrust between the two groups (Salinas and Rabia, 2009, p.13)