PLEA BARGAINING Plea bargaining can be defined ,“as an agreement between a prosecutor and a defendant whereby the defendant is allowed to plead guilty to a lesser charge rather than risk conviction for a graver crime in order to avoid a protracted trial or to win the defendant's cooperation as a witness”…
Sometimes evidence, prior history, wealth and family can lure someone in power to change the way they may feel about prosecution others. The prosecuting attorney is the one who would decide whether a plea bargain is suitable. This should not be the case. A prosecuting attorney can decide to let someone whom is convicted to accept a plea bargain. Sometimes the plea bargain is given to the wrong person. Plea bargaining should be abolished under certain circumstances. Crimes that are a felony offense should not be able to accept a plea bargain. If the charge is damaging enough to qualify as a felony, the charge should not be able to be lessened. Those who are guilty of a certain crime should be held responsible for the crime committed. To give an example of why plea bargaining should be abolished in some cases is important. If a man in convicted of a felony rape charge, the charge can put the man in jail. In jail he will be forced to serve time for a crime that he committed. While in jail, he can no longer hurt anyone else. If the man is offered a plea bargain and this plea bargain will keep him out of jail, he will be free to be out on the streets again. In this case, he may commit another crime. This can allow taking another victim. It is easy to see how this could have been avoided. On the other hand, there is a good side to offering a plea bargain. ...
Cite this document
(“Plea Bargaining Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.net/other/18166-plea-bargaining
(Plea Bargaining Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words)
“Plea Bargaining Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.net/other/18166-plea-bargaining.
Running Head: Plea-bargaining Plea-bargaining Name: Course: Lecturer: Date: Plea-bargaining accounts for 90% of convictions in the US. Plea-bargaining is where the accused person pleads guilty in a negotiation with the prosecutor where concessions form the motivation for the bargain (Ross, 2006).
The criminal justice system has always been under immense pressure to devise legal options and practices that facilitate a better use of the scarce resources and time while making way for the rule of law. Plea bargaining is one such legal option or practice.
Obviously, someone is benefited by guilty pleas, otherwise there would be none. Our question of research is to determine what these benefits are, and who obtains them. Do they occur to attorneys and courts interested in speed and efficiency at the expense of the accused Do they benefit defendants as well The paper has suggested an affirmative answer to these questions in the light of available history of such cases supported with the literature at hand.
If the purpose of the justice system is to deter crime, then it must administer punishments that are harsher than the perceived benefit of committing that crime. For example, it would be foolish to administer a one hundred
The purpose is to allow a lenient judgment against the accused and reduce wastage of time during full trial. Plea bargaining discourages sentencing roles since retribution is aimed at punishing the offender in equal measure to the crime committed. Retribution seeks to
got to the scene, Pomona officers, Hamilton and Tucker, hulled him to the ground and handcuffed him despite explaining to them that he was an LAPD officer off-duty. Pomona police officials then informed LAPD supervisors of Arreola of his conduct and arrest, which prompted